Sorry, I don't fit in here because I am ret*d

Page 2 of 2 [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

boots_dy1
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 13 Nov 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 64
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

29 Nov 2008, 4:27 pm

LadyMacbeth wrote:
Eh? I said he was a twit.


The feeling is mutual.


_________________
Still waiting on the proof that there is no afterlife, meanwhile I'm getting old, dearie me!


boots_dy1
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 13 Nov 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 64
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

29 Nov 2008, 4:32 pm

Mw99 wrote:
boots_dy1 wrote:
Daniel41149512 wrote:
boots_dy1 wrote:
I don't fit in here because I am ret*d


What a silly thing to get upset about! XD

Me thinks you're a generic attention-seeker. Go make a youtube video or something.


I'm not actually ret*d but I do have these sorts of episodes from time to time where I read all sorts of hidden meanings in what people write and say, I can play the drama queen when the occasion calls


What's your diagnosis?


BTW, if you believe what your icon says, your first post is redundant.


If you don't believe what my icon says then your above post is redundant.



boots_dy1
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 13 Nov 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 64
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

29 Nov 2008, 4:35 pm

And the correct term is avatar and not icon.



LadyMacbeth
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 May 2007
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,091
Location: In the girls toilets at Hogwarts, washing the blood off my hands.

29 Nov 2008, 4:44 pm

boots_dy1 wrote:
LadyMacbeth wrote:
Eh? I said he was a twit.


The feeling is mutual.


Aww, you feel you're a twit too? Bless.


_________________
We are the mutant race!! !! Don't look at my eyes, don't look at my face...


boots_dy1
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 13 Nov 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 64
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

29 Nov 2008, 4:54 pm

LadyMacbeth wrote:
boots_dy1 wrote:
LadyMacbeth wrote:
Eh? I said he was a twit.


The feeling is mutual.


Aww, you feel you're a twit too? Bless.


:lol:



Aspiewordsmith
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2008
Age: 58
Gender: Male
Posts: 572
Location: United Kingdom, England, Berkshire, Reading

29 Nov 2008, 5:03 pm

I think that IQ tests are inaccurate and it does not matter whether they are online, the BBC type with Anne Robinson, or a properly qualified clinical psychologist, they are always going to be incorrect as the IQ test is specially designed for the neurotypical in mind and not for those of us that have Asperger syndrome. They are simply not worth the paper they are written on. So They should never be left on file especially when so much of them can be erroneous. For example a person who is supposed to have an IQ of only 110 would not be capable of understanding concepts in organic chemistry and other technical matters of that nature. If someone does score a lowish IQ like that and do well in technical subjects like organic chemistry then the Examiner must have made a gross mistake. :idea:



Mw99
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Sep 2007
Age: 125
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,088

29 Nov 2008, 8:07 pm

boots_dy1 wrote:

Quote:
BTW, if you believe what your icon says, your first post is redundant.


If you don't believe what my icon says then your above post is redundant.


Not really. Just because I believe that people who believe that 911 was an inside job are morons, it doesn't mean that all people who believe that 911 was not an inside job believe that people who believe that 911 was an inside job are morons.