Page 2 of 3 [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Marcia
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2008
Age: 56
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,148

01 Dec 2008, 9:54 pm

Fnord wrote:
The website is wrong. Line up the balls in the following order, from left to right:

3 yellow balls, then 5 red balls, then the 7 blue balls (I did it with marbles, but the same principle applies).

Then you could see graphically that the minimum number of balls required to be picked is 9 IF you pick from left to right. You get the answer of 13 ONLY if you pick from right to left.

:P


Ah, but the balls are in a box and you're picking them out at random. You could pick out all the red balls and all the blue balls in the first 12 tries, leaving the three yellow ones, so you would need to pick out 13 to ensure you had one of each colour.

The tulip one - I don't get. :?



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

01 Dec 2008, 10:01 pm

Marcia wrote:
Fnord wrote:
The website is wrong. Line up the balls in the following order, from left to right:

3 yellow balls, then 5 red balls, then the 7 blue balls (I did it with marbles, but the same principle applies).

Then you could see graphically that the minimum number of balls required to be picked is 9 IF you pick from left to right. You get the answer of 13 ONLY if you pick from right to left.

:P

Ah, but the balls are in a box and you're picking them out at random. You could pick out all the red balls and all the blue balls in the first 12 tries, leaving the three yellow ones, so you would need to pick out 13 to ensure you had one of each colour.

Grr... Aspie mindlock...

The realm of probability includes the equal possibility of either 3 yellow, 5 red, and 1 blue OR 7 blue, 5 red, and 1 yellow. Nowhere in any of the rules was the use of probability theory prohibited. Remember, the minimum number of balls was specified, not the order of the draw!

I guess I've become too used to solving problems by thinking outside the box, especially when there was no box defined.



Death_of_Pathos
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 351

01 Dec 2008, 10:10 pm

Fnord wrote:
The website is wrong. Line up the balls in the following order, from left to right:

3 yellow balls, then 5 red balls, then the 7 blue balls (I did it with marbles, but the same principle applies).

Then you could see graphically that the minimum number of balls required to be picked is 9 IF you pick from left to right. You get the answer of 13 ONLY if you pick from right to left.

:P


Its supposed to be a random pick, worst case scenario.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

01 Dec 2008, 10:11 pm

Death_of_Pathos wrote:
Fnord wrote:
The website is wrong. Line up the balls in the following order, from left to right:

3 yellow balls, then 5 red balls, then the 7 blue balls (I did it with marbles, but the same principle applies).

Then you could see graphically that the minimum number of balls required to be picked is 9 IF you pick from left to right. You get the answer of 13 ONLY if you pick from right to left.

:P

Its supposed to be a random pick, worst case scenario.

Random pick is stated. Worst case is not. 9 merely has less probability than 13, given all possible permutations.

Quote:
You have 5 red balls, 7 blue balls and 3 yellow balls in a box. You reach in without looking and pull out one ball at a time. What is the fewest number of balls you would need to take out to be sure you took out at least one ball of each color? 3,5,9 or 13

Never assume more than what the stated evidence allows, OR what your own reasoning ability permits.
I'm right. The website is wrong. Plain and simple. You may now bow before my genius.



Last edited by Fnord on 01 Dec 2008, 10:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Death_of_Pathos
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 351

01 Dec 2008, 10:16 pm

"... to be sure ..."

Assuming you can check the properties of the balls removed, the minimum is 3.

Assuming you can not, the minimum is 13.

Being obstinate doesn't make you right.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

01 Dec 2008, 10:17 pm

Death_of_Pathos wrote:
"... to be sure ..."

Assuming you can check the properties of the balls removed, the minimum is 3.

Assuming you can not, the minimum is 13.

Being obstinate doesn't make you right.

Of course, you are right on both counts.

I bow before YOUR genius!

:hail:



jus4u76
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 123
Location: where i am

01 Dec 2008, 10:17 pm

Fnord wrote:
Death_of_Pathos wrote:
Fnord wrote:
The website is wrong. Line up the balls in the following order, from left to right:

3 yellow balls, then 5 red balls, then the 7 blue balls (I did it with marbles, but the same principle applies).

Then you could see graphically that the minimum number of balls required to be picked is 9 IF you pick from left to right. You get the answer of 13 ONLY if you pick from right to left.

:P

Its supposed to be a random pick, worst case scenario.

Random pick is stated. Worst case is not. Never assume more than what they evidence allows.

I'm right. The website is wrong. Plain and simple.


What is the FEWEST NUMBER OF BALLS you would need to take out to be sure you took out at least one ball of each color?

i initially thought 9 and still do. it only says fewest and doesn't say both the fewest and the worst.



Death_of_Pathos
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 351

01 Dec 2008, 10:20 pm

jus4u76 wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Death_of_Pathos wrote:
Fnord wrote:
The website is wrong. Line up the balls in the following order, from left to right:

3 yellow balls, then 5 red balls, then the 7 blue balls (I did it with marbles, but the same principle applies).

Then you could see graphically that the minimum number of balls required to be picked is 9 IF you pick from left to right. You get the answer of 13 ONLY if you pick from right to left.

:P

Its supposed to be a random pick, worst case scenario.

Random pick is stated. Worst case is not. Never assume more than what they evidence allows.

I'm right. The website is wrong. Plain and simple.


What is the FEWEST NUMBER OF BALLS you would need to take out to be sure you took out at least one ball of each color?

i initially thought 9 and still do. it only says fewest and doesn't say both the fewest and the worst.


Might want to reconsider that Math major... and to also post stuff like this in the Random forum. Its what its there for.



jus4u76
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 123
Location: where i am

01 Dec 2008, 10:22 pm

Death_of_Pathos wrote:
jus4u76 wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Death_of_Pathos wrote:
Fnord wrote:
The website is wrong. Line up the balls in the following order, from left to right:

3 yellow balls, then 5 red balls, then the 7 blue balls (I did it with marbles, but the same principle applies).

Then you could see graphically that the minimum number of balls required to be picked is 9 IF you pick from left to right. You get the answer of 13 ONLY if you pick from right to left.

:P

Its supposed to be a random pick, worst case scenario.

Random pick is stated. Worst case is not. Never assume more than what they evidence allows.

I'm right. The website is wrong. Plain and simple.


What is the FEWEST NUMBER OF BALLS you would need to take out to be sure you took out at least one ball of each color?

i initially thought 9 and still do. it only says fewest and doesn't say both the fewest and the worst.


Might want to reconsider that Math major... and to also post stuff like this in the Random forum. Its what its there for.


what's wrong with my math skills because im narrow-minded? what can i actually major in if not math? garbage-analysis major?



Death_of_Pathos
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 351

01 Dec 2008, 10:26 pm

jus4u76 wrote:
what's wrong with my math skills


The best way for me to respond is with a simple challenge:

Using (semi)formal logic, defend your position that it takes a minimum of 9 draws to ensure you have one ball of each color.

EDIT: To be clear, I don't care what you major in. Math majors are not for the weak of heart, and CS degrees require almost as much. They require a much more thorough understanding of logic then why the answer is either 3 or 13. (same thing with Philosophy as well, if I am to believe what I've heard)



Last edited by Death_of_Pathos on 01 Dec 2008, 10:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

pakled
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Nov 2007
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,015

01 Dec 2008, 10:31 pm

As I remember;

The current calendar system has leap years in every year divisible by four, except

for the Centenary years, but only every 400 years (2000 was a leap year, but 1900 was not)

Don't blame me, blame Rome...;)



Death_of_Pathos
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 351

01 Dec 2008, 10:33 pm

pakled wrote:
As I remember;

The current calendar system has leap years in every year divisible by four, except

for the Centenary years, but only every 400 years (2000 was a leap year, but 1900 was not)

Don't blame me, blame Rome...;)


Actually since the year is ~365.24 days long, that is one of the most logical ways to do it.

Basically you had to solve the series {2,1,1,1,2,1,1,1, ...} for the first sum divisible by 7. (365%7=1)



jus4u76
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 123
Location: where i am

01 Dec 2008, 10:35 pm

Death_of_Pathos wrote:
jus4u76 wrote:
what's wrong with my math skills


The best way for me to respond is with a simple challenge:

Using (semi)formal logic, defend your position that it takes a minimum of 9 draws to ensure you have one ball of each color.


i was kind of on the fence, but after i've posted that post, i think 13. i was here and there before after hearing an argument regarding 13. im kind of afraid of Fnord with a hideous picture of children in hoods. i've always been kind of intimidated by him. also he seemed pretty confident, so i went with him and i didn't want to argue. if i went against him, i would have to argue with him, but he's kind of intimidating and i don't want to confront him.



Death_of_Pathos
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 351

01 Dec 2008, 10:40 pm

jus4u76 wrote:
Death_of_Pathos wrote:
jus4u76 wrote:
what's wrong with my math skills


The best way for me to respond is with a simple challenge:

Using (semi)formal logic, defend your position that it takes a minimum of 9 draws to ensure you have one ball of each color.


i was kind of on the fence, but after i've posted that post, i think 13. i was here and there before after hearing an argument regarding 13. im kind of afraid of that Fnord person with a hideous picture of children in hoods. i've always been kind of intimidated by him. also he seemed pretty confident, so i went with him and i didn't want to argue. if i went against him, i would have to argue with him, but he's kind of intimidating and i don't want to confront him.


Sometimes I can't tell, so I have to ask.

You use poor grammar, you make several topics at once about the same thing in an inappropriate forum (was it 5 or 6 topics on these little tests in the General Autism Discussion board), and you say absurd things that are humorous if read in the right way (is it true men have bigger AS, your above post).

Are you a troll?



jus4u76
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 123
Location: where i am

01 Dec 2008, 10:44 pm

Death_of_Pathos wrote:
jus4u76 wrote:
Death_of_Pathos wrote:
jus4u76 wrote:
what's wrong with my math skills


The best way for me to respond is with a simple challenge:

Using (semi)formal logic, defend your position that it takes a minimum of 9 draws to ensure you have one ball of each color.


i was kind of on the fence, but after i've posted that post, i think 13. i was here and there before after hearing an argument regarding 13. im kind of afraid of that Fnord person with a hideous picture of children in hoods. i've always been kind of intimidated by him. also he seemed pretty confident, so i went with him and i didn't want to argue. if i went against him, i would have to argue with him, but he's kind of intimidating and i don't want to confront him.


Sometimes I can't tell, so I have to ask.

You use poor grammar, you make several topics at once about the same thing in an inappropriate forum (was it 5 or 6 topics on these little tests in the General Autism Discussion board), and you say absurd things that are humorous if read in the right way (is it true men have bigger AS, your above post).

Are you a troll?


i have ocd.



Death_of_Pathos
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 351

01 Dec 2008, 10:46 pm

So yes? No?