Page 2 of 7 [ 109 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

quietangel
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2005
Gender: Female
Posts: 362
Location: Maryland

28 Dec 2005, 2:45 pm

I scored an 11
This is indicative of problems with social interaction.

I have to agree with some of the earlier posts.. I based my answers on how I would react to the situation.. For example someone approaching the quick check with 15 items in the manner that the woman was would be shocking to me. Someone entering a store where the sign says no barefeet would be eccentric to me. They obviously don't understand rules.
Now checking the pin on the diaper would be a little wierd, only because of how I think it would be perceived... this one made me unconfortable to read. Maybe it was an internal rule that you don't touch other people's kids without them around or entrusting them to you.


_________________
I research therefore, I am.
Just call me "Miss Communication"


SB2
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,573
Location: Southern California

28 Dec 2005, 3:25 pm

the good news is i scored my favorite number; 13

The bad news is; i apparantly have a problem with social interaction.

well that's good too, i dont get why i should have to wait to eat if it makes me feel better.

But i would not sleep on some strangers floor, or change the diaper of a stranger that is shocking to me.


_________________
i will not cease in my never ending pursuit of the truth...
@ http://duncsdrivel.biz/intensity/index.php


SolaCatella
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Nov 2005
Gender: Female
Posts: 662
Location: [insert creative, funny declaration of location here]

28 Dec 2005, 3:55 pm

quietangel wrote:
I scored an 11
This is indicative of problems with social interaction.
.

What the heck?! I got exactly the same score and it said it was not indicitative of problems. (Emphasis theirs.)

What are they doing, giving random answers?



Asparval
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jul 2004
Gender: Male
Posts: 847
Location: UK

28 Dec 2005, 4:06 pm

11



quietangel
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2005
Gender: Female
Posts: 362
Location: Maryland

28 Dec 2005, 4:56 pm

I don't know... mine said it was indicative... wierd maybe I will retake it to see...


_________________
I research therefore, I am.
Just call me "Miss Communication"


quietangel
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2005
Gender: Female
Posts: 362
Location: Maryland

28 Dec 2005, 5:02 pm

OK I am an idiot... I answered the questions the same way as I did before and scored
score: 14
This is indicative for problems with social interpretation.
I think I thought I got an eleven... sorry bout the confusion.


_________________
I research therefore, I am.
Just call me "Miss Communication"


mjs82
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jun 2005
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,166

29 Dec 2005, 11:14 pm

Quote:
score: 16
This is indicative for problems with social interpretation.


It was an odd test because most of them seemed to deal with food issues. The nap example makes perfect sense to me though.

Weird it is say I.



mikibacsi1124
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2005
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 751
Location: Central NJ, USA

29 Dec 2005, 11:47 pm

I got a 7. This seemed fairly easy for me, just a test of common sense. Granted, I don't always get common sense perfectly. But this seemed pretty elementary to me - nothing really intricate. I guess I've learned a lot in my years.



Ladysmokeater
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Oct 2005
Age: 47
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,048
Location: North of Atlanta, South of Boston, East of the Mississippi, and West of the Atlantic

30 Dec 2005, 7:31 am

SolaCatella wrote:
I'm curious; is there anyone who took it that it DIDN'T confuse? Someone should email this lady and tell her that most people can't make heads or tails of the wretched thing.


It was odd. Even being as eccentric as I am some of that stuff was really strange. I got a 6..... what score meant you had social issues?



lowfreq50
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 May 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,536
Location: Gainesville, Florida

30 Dec 2005, 6:04 pm

I scored an 8.


The situations described were either very weird or normal. Austic or not, it shouldn't be hard to determine which is which. Unless your parents didn't teach you anything.


Not a good test, in my opinion.



lowfreq50
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 May 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,536
Location: Gainesville, Florida

30 Dec 2005, 6:08 pm

SB2 wrote:
the good news is i scored my favorite number; 13

The bad news is; i apparantly have a problem with social interaction.

well that's good too, i dont get why i should have to wait to eat if it makes me feel better.

But i would not sleep on some strangers floor, or change the diaper of a stranger that is shocking to me.


I said the diaper changing was shocking... messing with someone else's kid is a big mistake.

Sleeping on the floor or behind a bush (read: in the dirt) is not clean therefore I said it was strange.

So, we agreed on what was strange but got very different scores (mine was 8). How odd.



Kiss_my_AS
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 14 Nov 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 261

30 Dec 2005, 6:19 pm

I got a 12, which is indicative for problems with social interpretation.



Sarcastic_Name
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Mar 2005
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,593

30 Dec 2005, 6:46 pm

score: 9
This is not indicative for problems with social interpretation.

Roger is crazy.


_________________
Hello.


Cade
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Aug 2005
Gender: Female
Posts: 894

30 Dec 2005, 9:58 pm

...



Last edited by Cade on 11 Feb 2006, 7:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Cade
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Aug 2005
Gender: Female
Posts: 894

30 Dec 2005, 10:02 pm

...



Last edited by Cade on 11 Feb 2006, 7:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Civet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2004
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,342

31 Dec 2005, 5:17 am

score: 8
This is not indicative for problems with social interpretation.