0_equals_true wrote:
Zeno wrote:
Confirms that Cho's aunt said he was autistic It's there. She said he was diagnosed as autistic.
That doesn't mean the dx was correct.
My thinking exactly.
Also, autism isn't a mental illness - our minds are wired differently, but we don't have problems with perceptions of reality. At worst, someone could call us "developmentally delayed". Autism or not, it doesn't mean he can't be mentally ill. And I think that all the TV shrinks who are analyzing the hell out of these tapes will either 1) disagree with the diagnosis of autism or 2) nod, say that it couldn't have caused a violent rampage, and move on to their theory of what mental illness he had.
The fact of the matter is, for how trendy of a dx autism is nowadays, I don't think that anyone wants to pin his actions on autism. Too many parents would freak out. Also, most people are diagnosed with schizophrenia and/or bipolar when they are his age, so to think that nothing could have changed with him since the time of his dx would be irresponsible.
Last of all, I think that the diagnosis of autism is extremely likely to be questioned on a cultural basis - this would be especially true if his diagnosis occurred in the years immediately following his immigration. Asians (and I'm not talking about 3rd generation Asian-Americans) are generally soft-spoken and don't make lots of eye contact. If he had a language deficit that could be explained by maybe a recent immigration, perhaps there will be enough basis to question the diagnosis as a cultural difference.
Edit: TM1 is saying that he read of an autism diagnosis in 1992 - that is consistent with the time of his immigration. I believe that this diagnosis is highly disputable due to the cultural differences between Asians and Americans, and the fact that you need to evaluate many culturally-based social interactions to make a diagnosis in an 8-year-old child in the first place.