Page 11 of 11 [ 162 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11

Fuzzy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,223
Location: Alberta Canada

14 May 2007, 3:41 pm

Cade wrote:
LOL. This drives me crazy. It's unPC to judge whether someone else is being an idiot or not. That's not hypocrisy - it's critical thinking. And I'm all for it.

This is what I have to deal with as a special ed teacher. Kids who have been dx'd, maybe misdx'd, at a very young age so they grow up thinking they're special and a victim and no one else has the right to steal away the attention they think is solely entitled to them. In other words, they're brats, and while I'm professionally bound not to call them that at work, I feel no such inhibition here. That aspie17's foaming at the mouth about supposed "attention whores" is simply because he is one (clinically, that's called "projection" - you see, if he gets to go around dx'ing other people, we should be able to dx him too). Obviously he has been made an attention whore, but he's still accountable for his behavior, so it's his own damn fault that he insists on staying one and bullying other people so he can claim center stage all for himself. For that, he does not get any sympathy from me.

Getting a dx is not an official certificate of entitlement or a free pass to play the victim all your life. It does not bestow you with any authority, least of which is the authority to decide who does and does not have AS. It's simply a professional acknowledgement that there are things you need to work on. I don't think aspie17 has figured that out yet. But for anyone going around boasting about having an IQ of 88, I suspect that realization is going to be a pretty big challenge in and of itself.


Amen.



Sedaka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind

14 May 2007, 4:15 pm

TheMachine1 wrote:
SteveK wrote:
That means AS people can NOT be ret*d!


Based on the DSM-IV your correct but I find it hard to believe that its not a condition that has a bell shaped IQ distribution. So people may get off on the semantics of calling others HFA, LFA or etc but I do not.


whether or not something has a normal distribution (bell curve) has nothing to do with WHERE on that continum it is normally distributed...

if there is no distinction between HFA/LFA/AS... then all data points TOGETHER should be normally distributed around 100 IQ...

if they are infact statistically different... then you'll see more than one hump along the IQ scale... which all together, don't look normally distributed... but taken separately, do... this is the idea that is currently taken, when they say AS is 100+ IQ.... they're just saying that the IQ range is statistically different and should not be lumped with other autistic IQs... it's perfectly probable... but considering our lack of defining marks... i am not fully confident in current analysis...


_________________
Neuroscience PhD student

got free science papers?

www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl