timf wrote:
It is interesting to see how some subjects can generate intense emotional outrage and yet at the same time have such poorly defined terms and understanding.
1. Classic Autism was used to describe those (particularly children) whose severe brain damage or malformation resulted in early death. Such malformation would be verified by autopsy. To define Aspergers in the same category (spectrum) can legitimately be questioned. It is my view that Aspergers is a neurological variation and not the same as brain damage, or being "disordered".
2. While there is some benefit from vaccinations, there are legitimate concerns and risks. The polarized views that it is all good or all bad tends to shut the door on truth that could be useful for parents. Shouting either view more loudly is of no help either.
Some areas of concern I have as a parent after doing some research on risks is that I prefer not to have a child under 3 vaccinated. I also prefer single dose administration. One of the risks I see is the potential for a side effect of brain inflammation and swelling. This can (if severe enough) result in brain damage.
One has to remember that doctors are no longer professionals (free to make and follow a "profession" - declaration of ethical standard) They have become employees of corporations and are bound to follow the instructions of their employers. This means that each person and parent needs to do more research on their own than to rely solely on a corporate agent.
No. The longer your child is unvaccinated, the higher the likelihood that the child themselves get very sick (or possibility die) or TRANSMIT the disease to someone who cannot be vaccined, due to cancer, for example. This has been the case multiple times,
immunocompromised children dying because of other parents' ignorant decision. Listen to medical professionals, not quacks on the internet, folks.
_________________
Diagnosed with
F84.8 (PDD-NOS) 2014
F33.1 Major Depressive Disorder, recurrent, moderate.
01 Aug 2019, 11:25 am
