For few year now I readed such discution there and there. I'm very favorable to the emergence of an Aspie nation, since all those palabre never ended in any action I taked the initiative to go further and act. I founded Aspia, «a different nation».
Magneto wrote:
Also, the term nation is distinct from the term state, though they are often used interchangeably.
You are right on that, the term nation is distinct from the term state and have different meaning. Here in canada we have many nations inside the state. The Native are the firts nations and the federal governament recently officialy recognised the obvious fact that Quebekers are a nation inside of Canada.
Magneto wrote:
I do recognise that the formation of a sovereign *state* is unrealistic at the current time; however, the creation of a *nation* - a collection of communities - within another state is not (shame; I was looking forward to forming the Aspie Defence Force
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca373/ca373cf6105a277f71f4423a82446d04559f9055" alt="Smile :)"
).
Agree 100%
Magneto wrote:
Before that, of course, must come the establishment of a single, prototype, aspie community.
Magneto wrote:
Then we need to select a model.
We need to select many model in fact and take for their experience what fit us the best. For now Aspia developement is based on a component oriented and networked approche.
Magneto wrote:
Perhaps, in a few years, Ethnogensis may have happened to make it a much more viable proposition. I wouldn't be all that surprised to see people identifying as Aspie in that way. If that happens, we are in a stronger position.
I hope!