23 Jul 2010, 9:38 am
23 Jul 2010, 10:40 am
Seanmw wrote:
mehhh, some people on here already have my address. A few opted to send via postal service. I only gave it out to members i trusted though. So if i were a scammer i guess that would make me the most careless scammer in the world 
.
Taupey told me about P.O. boxes though & i'm thinking i'll look into those.
Safer on the off-chance.
. Taupey told me about P.O. boxes though & i'm thinking i'll look into those.
Safer on the off-chance.
Seanmw wrote:
for the record though, i've yet to directly ask anyone for anything. All contributions thus far have been offered, not asked 
.
I didn't even start all this. Not to say i don't appreciate it though. This all originated and spun off from my thread in the haven. It was in fact other members who broached the subject of donation initially. I'm just glad for what little help people have felt inclined to offer.
. I didn't even start all this. Not to say i don't appreciate it though. This all originated and spun off from my thread in the haven. It was in fact other members who broached the subject of donation initially. I'm just glad for what little help people have felt inclined to offer.
Sean, I never said you were a scammer but I do think you are being scammed. This type of scam depends on hooking someone who is connected to a website or special intrest group. If a new poster came here we would all be laughing at that person if they asked for the money. If someone with over 2000 posts asked we would listen and be concernd since we a sort of know that person and are comfortable with that person. I told you what to watch out for so keep your eyes out stay alert think with your brain and not your heart. If it is a scam you could be implicated as a co-conspritor for helping that person raise money. You might not be deaclared guilty but they will run you through the wringer to prove you are an innocent victim involving lawyers and your time wasted in the courts proving your innocense.
23 Jul 2010, 11:21 am
b9 wrote:
anyway, i will give you up to $250, so tell me when you have the rest of the money and i will give it to you. any more than $250 and i need convincing evidence.
he needs to go and see what is happening. if it is a scam then so be it. he is upset and i will give him $250 to see whether it is true or false. if it is false, then he will learn a good lesson. if it is true then he will be able to do what is needed for her and him and that is to give her his love to strengthen her fight.
i have enough money that i would not consider agonizing over the details. any more than 250 and i would be annoyed that i gave it if it was a scam.
i did a vector analysis on the 2 pics of her face and they are the same.
sometimes it is better to err on the side of belief than on the side of caution.
i know that many people have not much money, but i do have money, and i do not have any pressing need for all of it, so if i just sit on a pile of it and watch someone else fail to go to someone they love before they die because i can not spare a little, then i am not happy with how i am.
i will never get scammed into bodgy investments and suchlike (emu oil type scams), but this situation has an urgency which i would prefer to overlook all the hesitation inducing analysis of, and just give him some money to get there, and if he reports it was a scam, then he and me and all that contributed will have paid for a valuable lesson and be wiser in the future.
melbi wrote:
$250 
you mean Autralian Dollars or Japanese Yen?????
$250 aud. you mean Autralian Dollars or Japanese Yen?????he needs to go and see what is happening. if it is a scam then so be it. he is upset and i will give him $250 to see whether it is true or false. if it is false, then he will learn a good lesson. if it is true then he will be able to do what is needed for her and him and that is to give her his love to strengthen her fight.
i have enough money that i would not consider agonizing over the details. any more than 250 and i would be annoyed that i gave it if it was a scam.
i did a vector analysis on the 2 pics of her face and they are the same.
sometimes it is better to err on the side of belief than on the side of caution.
i know that many people have not much money, but i do have money, and i do not have any pressing need for all of it, so if i just sit on a pile of it and watch someone else fail to go to someone they love before they die because i can not spare a little, then i am not happy with how i am.
i will never get scammed into bodgy investments and suchlike (emu oil type scams), but this situation has an urgency which i would prefer to overlook all the hesitation inducing analysis of, and just give him some money to get there, and if he reports it was a scam, then he and me and all that contributed will have paid for a valuable lesson and be wiser in the future.
Wow!
:lol
I have been wishing that I had enough "spare" money to do something like this, simply to "find out" what the truth is, like forking out to see someone's cards in a poker game! :lol ( and incidentally help someone if the story turns out to be true ).
If enough people chip in enough money to make the plane trip happen, and not just to swell sean's bank account because there isn't enough for a plane ticket, then I am willing to put 10$ on the table vie PayPal ( I haven't got the sort of money that b9 seems to have! ), but then sean *has* to get on the plane and go and see her! :lol No "not being able to do it after all", ... which is where it gets tricky.
.
23 Jul 2010, 12:56 pm
b9 wrote:
it depends largely on the doubling time of the cancer.
each cells splits into 2 cells in an amount of time that is the doubling period.
i am not using any reference for what i say because i am about to go to bed.
doubling time ranges from 20 to 60 days i think (from somewhere in my memory). cancer is an unrestrained doubling of genetically unrecognized imposter cells. the body is fooled into providing nutrition for a cancer because it sees the cancer as a vital process.
if the cancer metastasizes, then small bits of it break off and travel through both the veinous/arterial system as well as the lymphatic system, and those microscopic bits eventually lodge into other areas where they can not fit through like tiny capillaries in the liver and lung and pancreas etc. when they lodge there, they bind with the adjacent tissue and receive nutrition that the body gladly provides. they double in number in a certain amount of time, and continue to double in size unrestrained in every successive period of that length.
cancer is exponential in that it goes from 1 cell to 2 cells to 4 cells to 8 cells etc until it becomes invasive of the area that it occupies to the degree that it is catastrophically destructive.
when a cancer is the size of a baseball, then it will be the size of 2 baseballs in whatever its doubling time is.
primary pancreatic cancer is the most aggressive i think because it doubles in only a few weeks.
breast cancer is also very aggressive.
gastric cancer i think takes about 1 month to double in size.
the risk of metastasis is increased due to the action of the churning of the stomach, and if 100 tiny bits of cancer break off and get lodged in 100 other places in the body, then it becomes like a wildfire that is unstoppable.
anyway, my post is entirely unresearched and i am tired and maybe i should research it before i say it but i am too tired to determine.
anyway, i will give you up to $250, so tell me when you have the rest of the money and i will give it to you.
any more than $250 and i need convincing evidence. i am so tired that i am probably talking rubbish so i am going to flop off to bed.
interesting info, also quite a bit easier to understand. Coincidentally, my grandma died of pancreatic cancer maybe 5 years ago & so i know how true it is that that type of cancer can act pretty fast. Although i think she actually lasted about 6 months longer than the doctors thought she would. But it's also a really painful type of cancer i guess, because towards the end she was apparently constantly doped up on meds each cells splits into 2 cells in an amount of time that is the doubling period.
i am not using any reference for what i say because i am about to go to bed.
doubling time ranges from 20 to 60 days i think (from somewhere in my memory). cancer is an unrestrained doubling of genetically unrecognized imposter cells. the body is fooled into providing nutrition for a cancer because it sees the cancer as a vital process.
if the cancer metastasizes, then small bits of it break off and travel through both the veinous/arterial system as well as the lymphatic system, and those microscopic bits eventually lodge into other areas where they can not fit through like tiny capillaries in the liver and lung and pancreas etc. when they lodge there, they bind with the adjacent tissue and receive nutrition that the body gladly provides. they double in number in a certain amount of time, and continue to double in size unrestrained in every successive period of that length.
cancer is exponential in that it goes from 1 cell to 2 cells to 4 cells to 8 cells etc until it becomes invasive of the area that it occupies to the degree that it is catastrophically destructive.
when a cancer is the size of a baseball, then it will be the size of 2 baseballs in whatever its doubling time is.
primary pancreatic cancer is the most aggressive i think because it doubles in only a few weeks.
breast cancer is also very aggressive.
gastric cancer i think takes about 1 month to double in size.
the risk of metastasis is increased due to the action of the churning of the stomach, and if 100 tiny bits of cancer break off and get lodged in 100 other places in the body, then it becomes like a wildfire that is unstoppable.
anyway, my post is entirely unresearched and i am tired and maybe i should research it before i say it but i am too tired to determine.
anyway, i will give you up to $250, so tell me when you have the rest of the money and i will give it to you.
any more than $250 and i need convincing evidence. i am so tired that i am probably talking rubbish so i am going to flop off to bed.
.
& thanks.
23 Jul 2010, 1:02 pm
Todesking wrote:
Seanmw wrote:
mehhh, some people on here already have my address. A few opted to send via postal service. I only gave it out to members i trusted though. So if i were a scammer i guess that would make me the most careless scammer in the world .
Taupey told me about P.O. boxes though & i'm thinking i'll look into those.
Safer on the off-chance.
. Taupey told me about P.O. boxes though & i'm thinking i'll look into those.
Safer on the off-chance.
Seanmw wrote:
for the record though, i've yet to directly ask anyone for anything. All contributions thus far have been offered, not asked .
I didn't even start all this. Not to say i don't appreciate it though. This all originated and spun off from my thread in the haven. It was in fact other members who broached the subject of donation initially. I'm just glad for what little help people have felt inclined to offer.
. I didn't even start all this. Not to say i don't appreciate it though. This all originated and spun off from my thread in the haven. It was in fact other members who broached the subject of donation initially. I'm just glad for what little help people have felt inclined to offer.
Sean, I never said you were a scammer but I do think you are being scammed. This type of scam depends on hooking someone who is connected to a website or special intrest group. If a new poster came here we would all be laughing at that person if they asked for the money. If someone with over 2000 posts asked we would listen and be concernd since we a sort of know that person and are comfortable with that person. I told you what to watch out for so keep your eyes out stay alert think with your brain and not your heart. If it is a scam you could be implicated as a co-conspritor for helping that person raise money. You might not be deaclared guilty but they will run you through the wringer to prove you are an innocent victim involving lawyers and your time wasted in the courts proving your innocense.
23 Jul 2010, 3:08 pm
23 Jul 2010, 6:32 pm
23 Jul 2010, 8:13 pm
23 Jul 2010, 10:26 pm
24 Jul 2010, 12:03 am
24 Jul 2010, 1:58 am
*throws in one more hopeful effort to keep the thread from sinking into the abyss before turning in for the night* 
24 Jul 2010, 3:12 am
24 Jul 2010, 7:16 am
24 Jul 2010, 7:25 am
Taupey
Veteran
Joined: 24 Feb 2010
Age: 62
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,168
Location: Somewhere between juvenile and senile.
24 Jul 2010, 4:06 pm
I'm uncomfortable with it also. There is a lot of information missing from the picture. 
24 Jul 2010, 5:09 pm
