Page 3 of 3 [ 46 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Janissy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 May 2009
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,450
Location: x

10 Nov 2009, 7:01 pm

Hovis wrote:
I think perhaps one of the defining factors is that an NT person is constantly, permanently aware of other people. In the sense that their relationships with others around them, how those others see them, and their position in the social network are the most important thing in their lives - they define who they are.

When the test question, "You are stranded on a distant planet. Would you rather it be populated by aliens who are unpleasant and hostile towards you, or aliens who totally ignore you?" is put, the overwhelming majority of people choose the hostile aliens. I was absolutely bewildered by that until I realized why most people become so violently angry if they are ignored and consider it the worst thing that could possibly be done - it's because to ignore an NT person is to make them disappear. If they do not know what you think of them, cannot make a connection - for better or worse - with you, and cannot find out enough about you to decide where you stand in relation to them, part of their identity is literally taken away.


All this is certainly true for me anyway. Maybe that's the NT in me. But I see it here too in anguished threads of a certain theme that appear maybe once every month or so. In these threads, the OP will say that they have been posting and posting and posting and posting but nobody acknowledges their posts either by referring to them or by quoting them. People will step in with tips on how to write the sort of post that will make people want to respond to it. What are those threads but exactly the sort of thing you are talking about? The only difference is that the craving for others to acknowledge you exist is being expressed in cyberspace rather than in physical space. So I think that's a human thing as much as an NT thing. If it weren't, the archives wouldn't be full of "is anybody reading my posts??" wails.



BruceCM
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2009
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 520
Location: Exeter, England

10 Nov 2009, 7:14 pm

NT means hypocritical, judgmental, insensitive, unsympathetic, rude, arrogant, conceited, etc (Not quite, really!) :lol:



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

10 Nov 2009, 7:48 pm

BruceCM wrote:
NT means hypocritical, judgmental, insensitive, unsympathetic, rude, arrogant, conceited, etc (Not quite, really!) :lol:


Are we a bigot today?

ruveyn



BruceCM
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2009
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 520
Location: Exeter, England

10 Nov 2009, 8:05 pm

The (not quite, really!) & :lol: were meant to indicate humour! :lol:



pensieve
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Nov 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,204
Location: Sydney, Australia

10 Nov 2009, 9:47 pm

boring.


_________________
My band photography blog - http://lostthroughthelens.wordpress.com/
My personal blog - http://helptheywantmetosocialise.wordpress.com/


nara44
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 May 2008
Age: 70
Gender: Male
Posts: 545
Location: Israel

10 Nov 2009, 11:29 pm

Janissy wrote:
Hovis wrote:
I think perhaps one of the defining factors is that an NT person is constantly, permanently aware of other people. In the sense that their relationships with others around them, how those others see them, and their position in the social network are the most important thing in their lives - they define who they are.

When the test question, "You are stranded on a distant planet. Would you rather it be populated by aliens who are unpleasant and hostile towards you, or aliens who totally ignore you?" is put, the overwhelming majority of people choose the hostile aliens. I was absolutely bewildered by that until I realized why most people become so violently angry if they are ignored and consider it the worst thing that could possibly be done - it's because to ignore an NT person is to make them disappear. If they do not know what you think of them, cannot make a connection - for better or worse - with you, and cannot find out enough about you to decide where you stand in relation to them, part of their identity is literally taken away.


All this is certainly true for me anyway. Maybe that's the NT in me. But I see it here too in anguished threads of a certain theme that appear maybe once every month or so. In these threads, the OP will say that they have been posting and posting and posting and posting but nobody acknowledges their posts either by referring to them or by quoting them. People will step in with tips on how to write the sort of post that will make people want to respond to it. What are those threads but exactly the sort of thing you are talking about? The only difference is that the craving for others to acknowledge you exist is being expressed in cyberspace rather than in physical space. So I think that's a human thing as much as an NT thing. If it weren't, the archives wouldn't be full of "is anybody reading my posts??" wails.


I agree
this is true of every one
NT and AS
every one want to be noticed and have his identity confirmed and have at least someone that can communicate with him
the difference is that AS typically or generally have an identity that goes deeper than a position in the social network or in some hierarchy or any other such factors that so crucial to the NT identity and that one of the main source for the tragic and painful state of affairs between us and them
as Hovis wrote, our mere existence is making hole in the NT sense of reality
and vice versa
the difference is AS are generally more tolerant and can take a lot before they explode because their identity lies much deeper than the relative things NT cling to so desparatly
that's why in most cases it is the NT bullying AS and not the oposite
i want and need to be acknowledge just like an NT
even more so
but i don't enforce or manipulate people to recognize or acknowledge me which is one of the reasons most NT see me as a detached, freaky, alien creature
we need recognition and we need it badly but it had to be fair,balanced,integrative,communicative,respectful(not the NT kind of respect),creative and attentive
qualities that are missing badly in the social skills of the NT because they are so caught up with the most trivial and egocentric aspect of their existence
so
i may not serve the NT meaningless pride and they would give me hell for that but they don't acknowledge my love and usually my reaction is just to go away and live then alone which makes them even madder because most of them doesn't have the slightest clue about life and beyond their mask of confidence the are as frightened as little babies



nara44
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 May 2008
Age: 70
Gender: Male
Posts: 545
Location: Israel

10 Nov 2009, 11:33 pm

pensieve wrote:
boring.


excellent
very insightful and respectful of others who took their time to think and expressed themselves



nara44
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 May 2008
Age: 70
Gender: Male
Posts: 545
Location: Israel

10 Nov 2009, 11:39 pm

ruveyn wrote:
BruceCM wrote:
NT means hypocritical, judgmental, insensitive, unsympathetic, rude, arrogant, conceited, etc (Not quite, really!) :lol:


Are we a bigot today?

ruveyn


we may have to be more careful not to let the pc thing stand between us and accurate observations as they are so crucial to our survival



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

11 Nov 2009, 2:33 am

Zeek wrote:
I've read heaps of books on autism, saying what it's like to be autistic but what is it like to be normal? All these books are explaining autism to normal people but I've never seen a book explaining normality to autistic people. Can anyone explain this to me? Thanks


Everyone on Earth is abnormal. So don't sweat it.

ruveyn



nara44
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 May 2008
Age: 70
Gender: Male
Posts: 545
Location: Israel

11 Nov 2009, 3:06 am

ruveyn wrote:
Zeek wrote:
I've read heaps of books on autism, saying what it's like to be autistic but what is it like to be normal? All these books are explaining autism to normal people but I've never seen a book explaining normality to autistic people. Can anyone explain this to me? Thanks


Everyone on Earth is abnormal. So don't sweat it.

ruveyn


that's not entirely true,
'normal' maybe a relative term and from a certain point of view meaning less but still it could be very useful and practical for an AS to map his deviations from the norm as a means for self realization and optimal decision making .
I'm for sweating it.



Who_Am_I
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,632
Location: Australia

11 Nov 2009, 4:01 am

nara44 wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
BruceCM wrote:
NT means hypocritical, judgmental, insensitive, unsympathetic, rude, arrogant, conceited, etc (Not quite, really!) :lol:


Are we a bigot today?

ruveyn


we may have to be more careful not to let the pc thing stand between us and accurate observations as they are so crucial to our survival


"Don't be PC" should not be used as an argument for bigotry. BruceCM was joking, but there are people who honestly believe that all NTs are hypocritical, judgemental, insensitive, unsympathetic, rude, arrogant, conceited, etc. This is not correct. The thing that differentiates them from those with an ASD is that they do not display autistic traits to a disabling degree, not any particular character traits.


_________________
Music Theory 101: Cadences.
Authentic cadence: V-I
Plagal cadence: IV-I
Deceptive cadence: V- ANYTHING BUT I ! !! !
Beethoven cadence: V-I-V-I-V-V-V-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I
-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I! I! I! I I I


nara44
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 May 2008
Age: 70
Gender: Male
Posts: 545
Location: Israel

11 Nov 2009, 4:25 am

Who_Am_I wrote:
nara44 wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
BruceCM wrote:
NT means hypocritical, judgmental, insensitive, unsympathetic, rude, arrogant, conceited, etc (Not quite, really!) :lol:


Are we a bigot today?

ruveyn


we may have to be more careful not to let the pc thing stand between us and accurate observations as they are so crucial to our survival


"Don't be PC" should not be used as an argument for bigotry. BruceCM was joking, but there are people who honestly believe that all NTs are hypocritical, judgemental, insensitive, unsympathetic, rude, arrogant, conceited, etc. This is not correct. The thing that differentiates them from those with an ASD is that they do not display autistic traits to a disabling degree, not any particular character traits.


i didn't wrote "Don't be PC" but recommended of cautious use of it
but what u just wrote is not PC as possible because to see autistic traits only from the "disabling" angle is the worst kind of bigotry because it lacks the critical and necessary angle of why is a certain traits are disabling in a certain society
it's like blaming the African american for their disabled status in the US society at certain times and today
context is the best weapon against bigotry
otherwise it's just big words and hypocrisy
for instance
an honest man would be disabled in today society
and too many AS are honest to a fault



Hovis
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jul 2006
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 936
Location: Lincolnshire, England

11 Nov 2009, 4:47 am

Janissy wrote:
All this is certainly true for me anyway. Maybe that's the NT in me. But I see it here too in anguished threads of a certain theme that appear maybe once every month or so. In these threads, the OP will say that they have been posting and posting and posting and posting but nobody acknowledges their posts either by referring to them or by quoting them. People will step in with tips on how to write the sort of post that will make people want to respond to it. What are those threads but exactly the sort of thing you are talking about? The only difference is that the craving for others to acknowledge you exist is being expressed in cyberspace rather than in physical space. So I think that's a human thing as much as an NT thing. If it weren't, the archives wouldn't be full of "is anybody reading my posts??" wails.


I've seen the kinds of posts you mean, and, to be honest, they puzzle me a little as well. If I started a thread and no-one replied, I would be somewhat disappointed, but because the exchange of ideas on the subject that I was interested to read hadn't taken place. It wouldn't bother me much, if at all, that nobody had acknowledged me, per se. Perhaps that makes me even more Aspie than I thought, or perhaps it's something else. :?: Trying to write the sort of post that makes people want to respond doesn't seem logical, because then the actual content of the post is becoming irrelevant, and the poster is saying that all they care about is the validation - a bit like small talk.

nara44 wrote:
I agree
this is true of every one
NT and AS
every one want to be noticed and have his identity confirmed and have at least someone that can communicate with him
the difference is that AS typically or generally have an identity that goes deeper than a position in the social network or in some hierarchy or any other such factors that so crucial to the NT identity and that one of the main source for the tragic and painful state of affairs between us and them


Yes. If I consider it, I would say that I perceive communication - and the purposes behind it - in a different way than most people. Thus:

Most (NT) people would place 'things to do' (like hobbies and interests) and 'social relationships' in two completely different categories. Although socializing might also be a way of passing the time, their need to be social is still for a completely different reason than simply occupying their mind.

For me, these two things are in the same category. Communicating with people has a mental purpose, because I want to pass on information, or enjoy discussing ideas - which is why small talk, which has no purpose other than to forge/strengthen a social bond, is utterly pointless to me. I am certainly not incapable of caring about people, yet I believe they do fundamentally occupy the same box in my mind as objects, objects that it is possible to communicate with.

I feel that I am a 'complete unit' in myself, a unit which can look out and be interested or entertained by outside factors, but doesn't need to connect with and bring them partly into itself to feel whole, which I think most people do. Does this make any sense?



nara44
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 May 2008
Age: 70
Gender: Male
Posts: 545
Location: Israel

11 Nov 2009, 6:01 am

Hovis wrote:


nara44 wrote:
I agree
this is true of every one
NT and AS
every one want to be noticed and have his identity confirmed and have at least someone that can communicate with him
the difference is that AS typically or generally have an identity that goes deeper than a position in the social network or in some hierarchy or any other such factors that so crucial to the NT identity and that one of the main source for the tragic and painful state of affairs between us and them


Yes. If I consider it, I would say that I perceive communication - and the purposes behind it - in a different way than most people. Thus:

Most (NT) people would place 'things to do' (like hobbies and interests) and 'social relationships' in two completely different categories. Although socializing might also be a way of passing the time, their need to be social is still for a completely different reason than simply occupying their mind.

For me, these two things are in the same category. Communicating with people has a mental purpose, because I want to pass on information, or enjoy discussing ideas - which is why small talk, which has no purpose other than to forge/strengthen a social bond, is utterly pointless to me. I am certainly not incapable of caring about people, yet I believe they do fundamentally occupy the same box in my mind as objects, objects that it is possible to communicate with.

I feel that I am a 'complete unit' in myself, a unit which can look out and be interested or entertained by outside factors, but doesn't need to connect with and bring them partly into itself to feel whole, which I think most people do. Does this make any sense?


i'ts not just that i share your 'complete unit' attitude but i can also trace many of the AS so called disabilities and traits to this unified view or mentality we have,
i too have trouble putting career and family in 2 different compartments
have trouble separate my love from my passion the way most NT do
have trouble separating interests from my social life
and so on
if u look at the record u might find that most of the behaviors that brand us as lucking social skills stem from this deficit in double faced attitude toward life
that why i never consider NT point of view of myself seriously and they are completely transperant to me and as such doesn't interest me even a bit
i can and must live the unified way
integration is my middle name which makes the seemingly sophisticated NT manipulative nature huge annoyance to me
what i found interesting and encouraging is that as i read AS forums i find more and more evidence of this kind of identity which proves to me that AS is not just some kind of deficit as too many people want us to believe but something to be happy about
we are the lucky one
may god have mercy on the NT :D