Body language is a stupid language!! !

Page 3 of 4 [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

ProfessorAspie
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 31 Mar 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 136

12 Apr 2010, 9:25 pm

Eggman wrote:
ProfessorAspie wrote:
Eggman wrote:

my genes dont need body language to be happy


lotta little Eggkids out there, are there? ;)

And?


and cool! Mazel Tov.



Julia_the_Great
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 292
Location: New England

13 Apr 2010, 5:45 am

Because of my Ashkenazi background, I gesture a lot. I try to use legit sign language signs often because I would be able to understand those.

And what I heard about playing with your hair is that it actually means that you want to be left alone.


_________________
Happiness is not something ready made. It comes from your own actions.
Dalai Lama


Meow101
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Age: 62
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,699
Location: USA

13 Apr 2010, 5:53 am

Eggman wrote:
ProfessorAspie wrote:
it's not stupid. it's actually a very efficient way of encoding basic information. You can (well, if you're not like me, anyway) encode this information while discussing entirely different subject matters. You can be exchanging data on nuclear chain reactions while simultaneously making arrangements for a conjugal encounter. It's like being a computer with several ports over which data can be sent.

Furthermore, it's advantageous because it's precognitive. Advantageous in the sense of natural selection. It allows certain basic drives (toward sex, for example) to operate in spite of top down processes that would rather focus on something else. So while it may be not helping *you* the individual, it is working overtime to ensure that your genes are "happy".


my genes dont need body language to be happy


Neither do mine. I manage to feed, clothe and shelter myself, and passed along my DNA to three new people, while being completely illiterate in body language. Now, other aspsects of life in an NT world...not so much.

~Kate


_________________
Ce e amorul? E un lung
Prilej pentru durere,
Caci mii de lacrimi nu-i ajung
Si tot mai multe cere.
--Mihai Eminescu


Aimless
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Apr 2009
Age: 67
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,187

13 Apr 2010, 6:42 am

Meow101 wrote:
Eggman wrote:
ProfessorAspie wrote:
it's not stupid. it's actually a very efficient way of encoding basic information. You can (well, if you're not like me, anyway) encode this information while discussing entirely different subject matters. You can be exchanging data on nuclear chain reactions while simultaneously making arrangements for a conjugal encounter. It's like being a computer with several ports over which data can be sent.

Furthermore, it's advantageous because it's precognitive. Advantageous in the sense of natural selection. It allows certain basic drives (toward sex, for example) to operate in spite of top down processes that would rather focus on something else. So while it may be not helping *you* the individual, it is working overtime to ensure that your genes are "happy".


my genes dont need body language to be happy


Neither do mine. I manage to feed, clothe and shelter myself, and passed along my DNA to three new people, while being completely illiterate in body language. Now, other aspsects of life in an NT world...not so much.

~Kate


I actually think I read body language pretty well, I just have no clue how to respond.



persian85033
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2009
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,869
Location: Phoenix

13 Apr 2010, 2:01 pm

Humans are very weird. I understand my cat's body language better. Especially when she expresses anything with her whiskers or pupils. And most especially her ears.


_________________
"Of all God's creatures, there is only one that cannot be made slave of the leash. That one is the cat. If man could be crossed with the cat it would improve the man, but it would deteriorate the cat." - Mark Twain


ProfessorAspie
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 31 Mar 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 136

13 Apr 2010, 3:31 pm

Meow101 wrote:
Eggman wrote:
ProfessorAspie wrote:
it's not stupid. it's actually a very efficient way of encoding basic information. You can (well, if you're not like me, anyway) encode this information while discussing entirely different subject matters. You can be exchanging data on nuclear chain reactions while simultaneously making arrangements for a conjugal encounter. It's like being a computer with several ports over which data can be sent.

Furthermore, it's advantageous because it's precognitive. Advantageous in the sense of natural selection. It allows certain basic drives (toward sex, for example) to operate in spite of top down processes that would rather focus on something else. So while it may be not helping *you* the individual, it is working overtime to ensure that your genes are "happy".


my genes dont need body language to be happy


Neither do mine. I manage to feed, clothe and shelter myself, and passed along my DNA to three new people, while being completely illiterate in body language. Now, other aspsects of life in an NT world...not so much.

~Kate


That's very good! Me too. But these are simply our anecdotes, and not data. And none of this speaks to my point, which is simply that employing multiple channels for the communication of information regarding sexual availability would be, in many cases, a trait that would likely be selected for, all other things being equal. This doesn't mean there aren't other modalities that can be employed to reach the same end, as several of us have amply demonstrated.



Rose_in_Winter
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Sep 2009
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 741
Location: Kansas City, MO

13 Apr 2010, 3:40 pm

Sophist wrote:
Body language is communication shorthand. It would take FOREVER if we had to communicate everything we wished to communicate, including all subtleties, via just words. And it would also take a considerable amount of energy for the listener to discern all information from a single mode of communication.


Some of us have to do that. No choice. Body language is impenetrable to me. I always stand the same way -- arms crossed, one hip cocked. I'm pretty sure the crossed arms say "pissed-off b***h" and the cocked hip says "come hither" so it's got to be confusing for people I'm talking to. I try to stand in different ways and the minute I stop thinking about, it's back to my usual stance. I have to use verbal language to communicate everything because I cannot use body language to do so. Yes, it takes longer, especially when I have to make certain the person is not reading things into what I'm saying (I can't do the multiple-meanings, nuanced language thing either), but it's the way I have to do things. I suppose it would be nice to have a choice, and I know it would be nice to know what other people are really saying and feeling (body language is supposedly very revealing), but I make do with what I've got. Luckily, verbal language has never been a barrier to me.



Sophist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Apr 2005
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,332
Location: Louisville, KY

14 Apr 2010, 8:10 am

I suspect that people who think they don't use any body language would be surprised to find that they do. Not typical or overt kinds necessarily, although there's probably some human commonality when it comes to simpler emotions like anger, etc. But I would be shocked to find a single person on earth, who isn't a vegetable, that doesn't use at least some aspects of body language.


_________________
My Science blog, Science Over a Cuppa - http://insolemexumbra.wordpress.com/

My partner's autism science blog, Cortical Chauvinism - http://corticalchauvinism.wordpress.com/


AceOfSpades
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,754
Location: Sean Penn, Cambodia

14 Apr 2010, 9:38 am

You could also call foreign languages stupid if you're not fluent in them. Oh, and before anyone starts coming back with a smart a** response about how body language and spoken languages are different, my point is that calling body language stupid just because you don't understand it goes by the same logic as calling a foreign language stupid for the same reason.

We do get a lot of s**t about our traits, but it doesn't help when you're not making an effort to understand either.



Spazzergasm
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2009
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,415
Location: Maine

14 Apr 2010, 12:44 pm

I think it's fascinating. It's such a quick way of information travel. I'm not always good at it though. Although I think I'm better than many on here, because in a way it's a special interest.



visagrunt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Vancouver, BC

14 Apr 2010, 4:35 pm

I cannot agree that body language is a "stupid" language.

Certainly it is a form of communication that I often fail to realize is being used--but my lack of comprehension doesn't make it stupid. Neither do I understand Farsi, but that doesn't make Farsi a stupid language, nor does it make me stupid for not understanding it.

What is stupid is the degree to which people fail to realize that not everyone understands their body language.

Let's face it--if I am too clueless to understand your body language, then continuing to send me signals in that idiom is no different than the tourist who repeats himself (gender exclusive chosen deliberately) in ever louder and ever more precise English, in the vain attempt to make himself understood.


_________________
--James


Noncon4mist
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Age: 57
Gender: Female
Posts: 53

14 Apr 2010, 4:56 pm

I once read in a mens magazine that if a woman flares her nostrils, she's horny. What a load of tosh.

I flare my nostrils when I'm angry, so there! (And so do most of my former bosses).



anbuend
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jul 2004
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,039

14 Apr 2010, 5:39 pm

I can read the body language of certain autistic people and the ones I can read can usually read me. It's a bit alarming after going through most of our lives with the "shield" over our emotions because people couldn't read our body language. But when we read each others, it's down to a level like... what our real emotions are, what we are focused on, what we wish people saw our emotions and focus as, etc. And to have that all readable feels very raw and exposed since normally nobody can see.

I can read certain aspects of the body language of people outside that group of people too. Much of it is self-protection: I usually see through sociopaths faster than nonautistic people do. I suspect I read different signals than nonautistic people do. The sociopaths are focusing their fake acts on the areas of body language nonautistic people can see. But they don't change the part I can see. So frequently I am the first to know.

I also think I picked a lot of it up during the time when words made zero sense to me. I relied hugely on patterns of movement and tonal and other auditory patterns in people's voices. There is some evidence that autistics with receptive language delays are better at this than autistics who understand language better. That has been a big error in some studies, they like using the autistic people who can use words, and most autistic people who can use words don't have these receptive language problems. For many autistics we can do either words or body language but not both at once and many autistics end up using words all the time and body language never, and that becomes the stereotype.

If I am struggling to use and understand language (and it's always a struggle) I am not as able to deal with body language. But turn off language and I can rapidly map the pattern of a whole room. I may not be good at the parts of body language nonautistic people understand but I can be very good at parts they don't understand. Nonautistic people have asked me to read people for them when I got a reputation among staff at one agency for it. Because I see things they don't see.

As a receptive language delayed person I find some of the comments on here about people who have language trouble and have to rely on body language really obnoxious. It really is very rich and textured and I still prefer it to language because it doesn't make my brain spin the way language does. It's not stupid and people who prefer to use it aren't somehow more like monkeys than other people. I can't stand having to use language but you don't find me insulting people who use it exclusively. Good grief.


_________________
"In my world it's a place of patterns and feel. In my world it's a haven for what is real. It's my world, nobody can steal it, but people like me, we live in the shadows." -Donna Williams


Janissy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 May 2009
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,450
Location: x

14 Apr 2010, 6:18 pm

anbuend wrote:
I also think I picked a lot of it up during the time when words made zero sense to me. I relied hugely on patterns of movement and tonal and other auditory patterns in people's voices. There is some evidence that autistics with receptive language delays are better at this than autistics who understand language better. That has been a big error in some studies, they like using the autistic people who can use words, and most autistic people who can use words don't have these receptive language problems. For many autistics we can do either words or body language but not both at once and many autistics end up using words all the time and body language never, and that becomes the stereotype.
.


Fascinating! My daughter was fairly significantly language delayed. She has language now, but it took awhile and is still somewhat idiosyncratic (invented words, backwards pronouns). But she doesn't seem to have the problems reading body language that the doctors led me to expect. She has no idea what she's supposed to do in social situations and avoids them, but it's not because she has no idea if somebody is happy, angry, sad, confused etc. She reads those well enough. She just doesn't know the social protocol involved and that makes her very nervous. She can certainly read me well enough. When she was less language-confident, her teachers had those PECS drawings of people emoting and she would point to one to show how she was feeling. Then when she talked more and became a schoolkid, she would come home from school and describe a fellow student's face and their body labguage and I would tell her the expected social response. (Still do. She's still a schoolkid.) The problem was never body language. It has always been what to do in response to the body language.

I figured this was just because nobody ticks off all the autism-trait boxes. But I never stopped to consider why she was better at reading body language than the doctors and books would have me believe. Before she talked (or talked in more than single words), she stared intensly at people all the time. She wasn't one of those kids that stared at ceiling fans or spinning wheels. She stared at people with such an intense stare and such intense eye contact that she didn't get an autism diagnosis for a while because they were looking for zero eye contact and eyes directed at the spinning fans. I don't know why I never connected her good ability at seeing body language with her long time spent staring at people but not talking. But I didn't. Now that you connect it, it does make perfect sense!



CockneyRebel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 117,079
Location: In my little Olympic World of peace and love

14 Apr 2010, 7:05 pm

I'm amazed that they even call it a language.


_________________
The Family Enigma


AmberEyes
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Sep 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,438
Location: The Lands where the Jumblies live

14 Apr 2010, 11:57 pm

visagrunt wrote:
What is stupid is the degree to which people fail to realize that not everyone understands their body language.


I think that there may be several different "non-verbal dialects" or body languages.

Some people could have "muted" versions of certain body languages or more limited facial expression repertoires. For instance, I've noticed that jealous gestures are absent from families and cultures that don't practice jealousy. These people wouldn't understand the need for this gesture and would therefore have difficulty interpreting ideas like jealousy. It would seem irrelavent to their lives. This is what I've noticed anyway.

If a body language element is missing from a culture, does that mean that the culture is "emotionally deficient"?

I'd say no: the culture would be qualitatively socially and emotionally different.
Coping mechisms and social structures would be different.

This is why I think it's a mistake and an oversimplification of reality to lump all body languages together and assume that everyone automatically knows everything about each one.