wavefreak58 wrote:
Kaybee wrote:
Interesting. I thought the tear was because he could never really have it, only a sad approximation.
I thought the tear was just from the wind blowing in his eyes.
I thought ly the same thing at first !
Recon wrote:
I think another factor is that aspies tend to be more visual thinkers than NTs (in general, not exclusively). The video is extremely visual, and uses direct imagery to convey an emotional concept. If instead, all you saw was a written script, as an aspie you may not get the same feeling as you do watching it. At least that's how it is for me.
I think 30% of the population (in general) is made of visual thinkers. Or at least, that most people can use a kind of visual thinking. I'm not sure about this because I am not in other people's head anyway.
I have shown this video to some people. Many were bored and said "stop showing me cartoon", others thought it was hilarious (at first I thought it would be funny, the classic gag of a creature falling down) and my mother who is a NT get it and was moved. She did not went as far as us in her reflexion though.
(Technically, I am non autistic, so maybe it's just that some people do not want to take the time to really watch it and understand the many meanings of it, it's like reading a book, sometimes there is more in it that most people think).
The meaning of it or the feelings we get probably comes from the music, the point of view (I love the shift in this video, the author succeed in making look like a real flight so that one can almost forget that the bird is just falling down) and the thinking.
Some people think it's funny, other will find this sad, and others will try to find the various meanings and start a philosophical debate about it.
(I am glad that I am not the only one who thought : why is not it wearing safety glasses or something like that.)
Anyway, this is really a good work because we can see it on so many levels.