riley wrote:
aspergers would not doubt interfere with the extensive social conditioning girls recieve that turns them into 'girls'.
I think that's the most elegant explanation I could ever ask for!
I think that, if I were to be given a dollar for every time I've been called a sissy, wimp, or homosexual (and in not such polite terms), I'd never need to work again.
I am a straight male, but I've never quite been able to 100% fit that stereotype enough for most other people, and never really felt a need to, except for the obvious dis-appointment my family has felt over my failure in that particular.
"Tom-boys" appeal to me, they act more like "normal human beings" than girls who fit the feminine stereotype. I don't mean a girl who looks like a man, but rather, a girl who isn't dependant and helpless and brainless (or, more precisely, has perfected that image). Not one whose appearence and every action is an attempt to communicate a promise that the highest bidder will win the perfect victim to defend and control.
Hurrah for aspergers tom-boys!