Page 3 of 3 [ 38 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Aspieallien
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2009
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 190
Location: NSW, Australia

19 Feb 2011, 1:45 am

simon_says wrote:
I think arrogance is one of the defense mechanisms listed in the complete guide. heh.


:)



TB
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Oct 2008
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 531
Location: netherlands

19 Feb 2011, 6:19 am

wavefreak58 wrote:
Aspieallien wrote:
No, it says absolutely EVERTHING about the scenario I was talking about in the first place. The fact that this behaviour is not necessarily unique specifically to either Aspie or NT is irrelevant. It just happens that this is the two groups of people we are discussing here. Yes you can expect to see this behaviour in many other groups I'm sure as this is part of human behaviour. My point here really was to invert the situation to demonstrate how NTs could suddenly become loners lacking in empathy and social skills if they were the less preferred minority group, and that being the less preferred minority group in itself contributes greatly to issues facing Aspies.


You are demonstrating confirmation bias. You have a point of view. A scenario is presented. You interpret that scenario in the light most favorable to your point of view.

First, by labeling everyone in the camp aspie or no aspie, you immediately skew the interactions towards biases intrinsic to each person. That alone is enough to destroy the inference you want to make (that aspies naturally socialize better with other aspies). By labeling them you have already divided the population. This anecdote is just that. It is an anecdote.


Something I don't get is this "aspies are superior" thing. I spent my entire life on the fringes, the recipient of exclusionary attitudes and biases. After decades of isolation I found a community of people just like me, and, ironies of ironies, there is a disturbing number of them that have adopted the same exclusionary attitudes and biases that have caused me so much pain. I really don't get it.



What it take from this is that the point was not about aspies being ''better'' but just taking from the story that nt and people on the spectrum can behave very similair, so actually if aspies where superiour the nt man in the story wouldnt be excluded in the first place. It shows how nt/aspie are more equal if you change their positions their behaviour would be the same.



jackbus01
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Feb 2011
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,197

19 Feb 2011, 6:23 am

wavefreak58 wrote:
Aspieallien wrote:
No, it says absolutely EVERTHING about the scenario I was talking about in the first place. The fact that this behaviour is not necessarily unique specifically to either Aspie or NT is irrelevant. It just happens that this is the two groups of people we are discussing here. Yes you can expect to see this behaviour in many other groups I'm sure as this is part of human behaviour. My point here really was to invert the situation to demonstrate how NTs could suddenly become loners lacking in empathy and social skills if they were the less preferred minority group, and that being the less preferred minority group in itself contributes greatly to issues facing Aspies.


You are demonstrating confirmation bias. You have a point of view. A scenario is presented. You interpret that scenario in the light most favorable to your point of view.

First, by labeling everyone in the camp aspie or no aspie, you immediately skew the interactions towards biases intrinsic to each person. That alone is enough to destroy the inference you want to make (that aspies naturally socialize better with other aspies). By labeling them you have already divided the population. This anecdote is just that. It is an anecdote.


Something I don't get is this "aspies are superior" thing. I spent my entire life on the fringes, the recipient of exclusionary attitudes and biases. After decades of isolation I found a community of people just like me, and, ironies of ironies, there is a disturbing number of them that have adopted the same exclusionary attitudes and biases that have caused me so much pain. I really don't get it.


So, you spent a lot of your life on the fringes. Your self-esteem is probably low. You wonder why people don't think like you and the world seems strange. Then you find a community of people "just like me" and your self-esteem is probably better. All people are exclusionary to some extant and everyone has biases, even if they don't admit them.
"aspies are superior" not necessarily, however there are many advantages to being on the AS. NT people will often claim these advantages are exaggerated or incorrect. It is therefore reassuring (isn't it?) to realize that you are not messed-up or defective (or diseased even!).
Now where is the irony? What do you not get? or maybe What do I not get?



wavefreak58
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Sep 2010
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,419
Location: Western New York

19 Feb 2011, 7:41 am

KBerg wrote:
What I found interesting about it was how his Aspie coworkers, once they realized how miserable he was, really did try to help out and include him. That and the fact that here was a guy who had never experienced anything like that level of exclusion and his reaction to it (extremely upset and frustrated to the point of crying) wasn't all that different from an Aspie's.


This is what was fascinating to me. Not the differences but the similarities. It's freaking HARD to be excluded from a group, even when it happens without intent or malice. I felt for he guy.

Quote:
Then they'd realized during the conversation the other person was an NT and it made them uncomfortable or had lead to confusion with questions.


This confuses me. People on the spectrum have speech difficulties with great regularity and are often harder to converse with.

Quote:
They used to have their guests even just leave a conversation flat out once they realized they were talking to an NT,


Since I wasn't there I can't really say, but this sounds like bias and prejudice. What is it about knowing a person is NT that suddenly changes your relationship?


Quote:
the badges were something they started using to make people more at ease after the complaints they'd gotten the previous year.


What would really be interesting is if they labeled a few NTas as aspie to see if everyone thinking they were aspie improved communication. And label a few aspies as NT to see if they got excluded.


_________________
When God made me He didn't use a mold. I'm FREEHAND baby!
The road to my hell is paved with your good intentions.


KBerg
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 400

19 Feb 2011, 12:05 pm

wavefreak58 wrote:
This confuses me. People on the spectrum have speech difficulties with great regularity and are often harder to converse with.

Since I wasn't there I can't really say, but this sounds like bias and prejudice. What is it about knowing a person is NT that suddenly changes your relationship?

Ok, those two kind of have the same answer so merging them to answer. The reason people would feel uncomfortable and leave was that the entire point of the camp was that Aspies be able to meet other Aspies face to face (or more probably awkward both eyes firmly on ground entire time talking to one another :wink: ) in a safe structured environment designed for their needs and comfort. So a huge part of it was that there was the expectation that the majority of people would be like them and have certain shared experiences and hopefully interests as well. Same way there's many things I feel comfortable talking about here, Aspie things like not liking people touching me or getting splitting headaches in social situations like parties, that I do not even try to explain to most NTs I socialize with. Discussing those things makes most NTs extremely uncomfortable or they start spouting platitudes like how I'm not trying hard enough or I just need to get out more and all my problems will fade away. Which in turn just makes me uncomfortable because there's some basic experiences they don't share with me that are extremely difficult to explain even if they don't shut me down when I try..

So it's the expectation in that specific environment that you are talking to someone who is more similar to you than the people in your normal day-to-day life, who won't reject or try to make light of your AS difficulties, that made people not want to talk to the NTs. The same is applicable to most conventions as well if you think about it. I mean if you go to say a Dr Who convention, you presumably go to such a convention to meet other Dr Who fans, not because you want to talk about football with the guy handling the security.

wavefreak58 wrote:
Quote:
the badges were something they started using to make people more at ease after the complaints they'd gotten the previous year.


What would really be interesting is if they labeled a few NTas as aspie to see if everyone thinking they were aspie improved communication. And label a few aspies as NT to see if they got excluded.

I agree, and I ended up discussing this with my friend a few times. She also thought it would be an interesting experiment - though not appropriate to a summer camp like that.



Aspieallien
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2009
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 190
Location: NSW, Australia

19 Feb 2011, 4:28 pm

TB wrote:
wavefreak58 wrote:
Aspieallien wrote:
No, it says absolutely EVERTHING about the scenario I was talking about in the first place. The fact that this behaviour is not necessarily unique specifically to either Aspie or NT is irrelevant. It just happens that this is the two groups of people we are discussing here. Yes you can expect to see this behaviour in many other groups I'm sure as this is part of human behaviour. My point here really was to invert the situation to demonstrate how NTs could suddenly become loners lacking in empathy and social skills if they were the less preferred minority group, and that being the less preferred minority group in itself contributes greatly to issues facing Aspies.


You are demonstrating confirmation bias. You have a point of view. A scenario is presented. You interpret that scenario in the light most favorable to your point of view.

First, by labeling everyone in the camp aspie or no aspie, you immediately skew the interactions towards biases intrinsic to each person. That alone is enough to destroy the inference you want to make (that aspies naturally socialize better with other aspies). By labeling them you have already divided the population. This anecdote is just that. It is an anecdote.


Something I don't get is this "aspies are superior" thing. I spent my entire life on the fringes, the recipient of exclusionary attitudes and biases. After decades of isolation I found a community of people just like me, and, ironies of ironies, there is a disturbing number of them that have adopted the same exclusionary attitudes and biases that have caused me so much pain. I really don't get it.



What it take from this is that the point was not about aspies being ''better'' but just taking from the story that nt and people on the spectrum can behave very similair, so actually if aspies where superiour the nt man in the story wouldnt be excluded in the first place. It shows how nt/aspie are more equal if you change their positions their behaviour would be the same.



TB, Yes the point I was trying to make was that if the situation was inverted the outcome would be inverted. If NTs were the minority, perhaps they could then be regarded as loners having poor social skills and lacking empathy, struggling against the same issues Aspies face today.

I was trying to “demonstrate” my observation of this prior to the TECHNICAL SCRUTINY my post received.

I am not quite sure where the idea that “aspies are superior” came from. I am a firm believer that each and every one of us is entitled to an equal measures of dignity and respect regardless of anything, NT or Aspie.

I have lived on the fringes as long as I can remember and I am quite sure nearly everyone here has experienced this too. This is something I can well and truly empathise with completely. To me the experiences of isolation, rejection and exclusion I have experienced make me more determined to treat everybody with the same dignity and respect we ALL DESERVE.

KBerg, I think the badges were a good idea for the situation at hand.
I recently went to an astronomy meeting in a public park, the members had tags identifying them so the newbie visitors, as I was could find the right people to talk to, and not go off and start talking to a football player about the Orion nebular.


_________________
Reality is wrong,
Dreams are for real.