SHUT DOWN AUTISM SPEAKS
CockneyRebel
Veteran
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=316_1739858568.png)
Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 117,477
Location: In my little Olympic World of peace and love
There are plenty of examples of people like Mozart or Jim Hensen who are highly successful. What the Civil Rights / ordinary human treatment / consideration and support for people on the Asperger's / Autism Spectrum needs are abundant examples of people who are medium successful.
Now, here's the tricky part. Coming out is a personal decision. And it's normal to come out in stages, disclosing in some situations, not others. Sometimes it goes well, sometimes it doesn't, and a lot of times you can't really tell how it went. Not an obligation, that's dry as dust. More like an open green field, and then feel and texture.
Uh... I am HIGHLY succesful.
I have looked high and low in the Portland area and there are not others like me around here.
A very, VERY high percentage are on SSI or suffering from other comorbid conditions that keep them for even begining to go where I am.
...just saying...
kfisherx, thank you for your very good work.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
The only thing I would ask, if you find yourself in position as employer or boss, please don't try and be a perfect boss for that's a trap. Just try and be a boss in the top 50% and that is plenty good enough.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
PS I kind of remember you're in computers. I tried to get into programming about ten years ago and found that these human resource types rule the world, or at least this corner of it.
LOL! I am already a senior manager. I hired another team member just today and I strive to be the best that I can be. In fact I learned today that in all my 360 feedback (people from below, beside and above me) there was not ONE piece of critisim. Nothing bad. That is actually unheard of and I am blown away by that. Top 50% is NEVER enough for me. I would not be where I am today if I settled for top 50%.
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
I don't think you've broken any rules yet, so I don't think you'll get banned.
I agree with you......if Auti$m $peak$ got shut down, the individuals would still have a right to free speech, as individuals, just like we have. The only thing they'd lose would be their media access, but you never said they have a right to that.
Their attempts to sue people for poking a bit of fun look quite vicious to me. One good sign is that they're obviously paranoid about their public image - that looks like a weakness, a Chinese in their armour that we might be able to use to get our revenge and to discredit them.
This is where I part ways. Revenge is poor motivation for anything. Autism Speaks smells of heavy handed monied interests and I have reservations about some of their activities and assumption that the speak for the autism community at large. But they are not entirely evil. I even resent that I sense pressure to choose sides. The worst thing for autism is to have an internecine struggle for dominance of thought.
_________________
When God made me He didn't use a mold. I'm FREEHAND baby!
The road to my hell is paved with your good intentions.
I was going to say something like "to stop them harming others," but that sounded pretentious. And I don't see why revenge always has to be a bad thing......I've seen it do good.
I don't think it's that bad yet. So far, we're just trying to get them down onto our level. I haven't heard talk of actually taking over their manor.
All you can do is impotently post angry messages to internet forums from anonymous accounts.
^^^THIS^^^
All of you pro-autism Autistics gather together and see if you can find enough high-functioning like-minded autistics to affect ANY sort of change to any cause let alone shut down a valid business with a worthy cause. I would LOVE to see anyone prove this statement wrong. As much as it hurts and it sucks, he is 10000% right.
Shutting down ANYBODY, is NOT the answer.
Freedom of speech belongs to everyone.
Even the idiots.
The best that anyone should be hoping for is to simply find other ways of speaking out, that they can't shut up. Autism Speaks is not omnipotent.
The idea of shutting them up simply lowers you to the same level. It's NOT the answer.
_________________
I'm not likely to be around much longer. As before when I first signed up here years ago, I'm finding that after a long hiatus, and after only a few days back on here, I'm spending way too much time here again already. So I'm requesting my account be locked, banned or whatever. It's just time. Until then, well, I dunno...
CockneyRebel
Veteran
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=316_1739858568.png)
Joined: 17 Jul 2004
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 117,477
Location: In my little Olympic World of peace and love
Freedom of speech belongs to everyone.
Even the idiots.
The best that anyone should be hoping for is to simply find other ways of speaking out, that they can't shut up. Autism Speaks is not omnipotent.
The idea of shutting them up simply lowers you to the same level. It's NOT the answer.
You bring forward a very good point. Imagine how we'd feel if Autism Speaks were to shut WrongPlanet down.
_________________
The Family Enigma
Do people really have to rehash this topic again, and again, and again, and again?
Especially in a case of thread-necromancy?
I'm seeing that a lot lately. I don't mind it so much when it's about some random topic that someone replied to from a few years ago. But I've seen some threads where like... well in one case it was a thread where people were arguing, and the person who had resurrected the thread hadn't even posted on it. They just posted "..." or something like that. As if they were just trying to stir up another round of dead-horse-flogging. And then they sat back and watched the show, presumably, without getting involved in any other way except starting the fight all over again.
_________________
"In my world it's a place of patterns and feel. In my world it's a haven for what is real. It's my world, nobody can steal it, but people like me, we live in the shadows." -Donna Williams
Do people really have to rehash this topic again, and again, and again, and again?
I believe the correct term is "broken record syndrome"
Does this fall under repetitive, stereotyped "movement"?
_________________
When God made me He didn't use a mold. I'm FREEHAND baby!
The road to my hell is paved with your good intentions.
Do people really have to rehash this topic again, and again, and again, and again?
Especially in a case of thread-necromancy?
I'm seeing that a lot lately. I don't mind it so much when it's about some random topic that someone replied to from a few years ago. But I've seen some threads where like... well in one case it was a thread where people were arguing, and the person who had resurrected the thread hadn't even posted on it. They just posted "..." or something like that. As if they were just trying to stir up another round of dead-horse-flogging. And then they sat back and watched the show, presumably, without getting involved in any other way except starting the fight all over again.
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
Only lately? Haven't been on much? It's pretty consistent from where I sit.
It's not usually a matter of "re"-hashing. For most of these people that are starting threads about it, it's a fresh topic to them. It will NEVER stop being brought up. Might as well get used to it. This thread isn't necro, it's new, but I know what you mean, that does happen a lot, and will continue to. Might as well get used to it.
"Hmm.. I'm sick to death of that topic" = "Not gonna post to it and help keep it alive."
Pretty simple formula for a grief free visit here.
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
_________________
I'm not likely to be around much longer. As before when I first signed up here years ago, I'm finding that after a long hiatus, and after only a few days back on here, I'm spending way too much time here again already. So I'm requesting my account be locked, banned or whatever. It's just time. Until then, well, I dunno...
Do people really have to rehash this topic again, and again, and again, and again?
Especially in a case of thread-necromancy?
I'm seeing that a lot lately. I don't mind it so much when it's about some random topic that someone replied to from a few years ago. But I've seen some threads where like... well in one case it was a thread where people were arguing, and the person who had resurrected the thread hadn't even posted on it. They just posted "..." or something like that. As if they were just trying to stir up another round of dead-horse-flogging. And then they sat back and watched the show, presumably, without getting involved in any other way except starting the fight all over again.
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
Only lately? Haven't been on much? It's pretty consistent from where I sit.
It's not usually a matter of "re"-hashing. For most of these people that are starting threads about it, it's a fresh topic to them. It will NEVER stop being brought up. Might as well get used to it. This thread isn't necro, it's new, but I know what you mean, that does happen a lot, and will continue to. Might as well get used to it.
"Hmm.. I'm sick to death of that topic" = "Not gonna post to it and help keep it alive."
Pretty simple formula for a grief free visit here.
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Oh, hmm.. I thought this particular thread was started by the first post pointing back to a thread from 2008 or something. Maybe I got the wrong thread.
_________________
"In my world it's a place of patterns and feel. In my world it's a haven for what is real. It's my world, nobody can steal it, but people like me, we live in the shadows." -Donna Williams
I have two thoughts on Autism Speaks:
1. They are not as educated as they need to be, and they seem to claim to speak for all on the spectrum. Bad.
2. They seem to be working for a cure for Autistic Disorder, which is a good thing. Very different from Aspergers, I've seen AD really mess with some poor children. I can't think of a single child, if given the awareness to make the choice between remaining Autistic and receiving a treatment to remove the condition who would choose to remain autistic.
This being said, I think that Aspergers needs to be distanced from Autism. Not because they are dissimilar, but because of laziness of media and public in their perceptions.
Charities in NZ like cancer this or heart foundation that or whatever, dont actually appear to do any good at all.
Figures for most disorders keep rising no matter how much money they make or are given.
They ALL seem like a scam to me, directors on big salaries in huge cars.....I hate seeing my money going to those guys
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Autism Speaks Canada Closing Down! |
23 Jan 2025, 11:15 pm |
Having Autism |
19 Dec 2024, 12:00 pm |
Autism and Fatigue? |
10 Dec 2024, 9:10 am |
Autism & Talking |
02 Feb 2025, 6:39 pm |