XFilesGeek wrote:
I disagree, at least in regards to English.
When it comes to English, a "grammar rule" is only true until it isn't. Some languages are better at keeping things consistent.
My knowledge of "proper English" was gleaned via lots of reading that eventually translated into an intuitive understanding. Nevertheless, I have sympathy for bad writers who can't grasp the mercurial moods of English.
You're right; many people have misused basic grammar for so long that it's become systemic in the language. Words drift in meaning through connotative usage, and there is always more than one solution to the structure of a given sentence. I have to order things logically, and grammar makes far more sense to me when approached from a math-centric perspective. It helps me figure out how to clarify meaning by ordering words in sentences by logical relationship, which is a lot like algebra when it comes down to the technical nitty-gritty. That's the only reason I say it's equivalent to math. It isn't necessarily so, but it can be so if that's how you approach it.
It took years to get to the point where I can look at it that way, though, and, like you, it's mostly from reading intensively and extensively. I sympathize when people struggle with it, I'm just not good at how I express it, I guess.