nomadder wrote:
I have another question about attachment to fictional characters but not real people.
Do you think you can get more attached to the fictional character because of the format where you learn about them. A book presents a character in depth, dramatizes traits, etc – you have such a clear picture or feel for that fictional character without any of the inconsistencies and interactional issues of real people.
So does that clarity perhaps allow you to feel more attached? Because you 'know' the fictional character and can understand the character better than a real person?
I've always thought this was the main source of my irrational attachment. I can see inside of their heads and get a clear view of what they're thinking of, wishing for, waiting for, etc. I have issues figuring out others' motives/intentions and usually have to be bluntly told what someone else is thinking or planning because I can't "read between the lines". I don't have this problem much with fictional characters, and when I do, I won't be hurt as a direct result of my cluelessness.
Another part of it, I think, is that if I don't like the direction they're moving in the story and they've become one of my special interests, I can ignore the canon and transport them into an alternate version of their world in my mind. There, I can control them and keep them from offending me, boring me, whatever. Wow, that sounds really bad and manipulative.
_________________
I know that, when I finally get my dream job, my patients won't laugh at me or call me a mutant.
AQ: 159/200 NT 50/200
EQ: 14 SQ: 85 AQ: 43 Other Test: 71/72
Undiagnosed: marginal costs > marginal benefits