Do you find that AS gives the wrong impression? (IQ)
I am not talking about people who may seem ret*d, I am talking about people who actually are. I have nothing against them, but they should not have received an AS diagnosis according to the diagnostic criteria.
For me, the whole point with having the term Asperger's (or any diagnosis), outside of a doctors office, is that it makes it easier for people to understand you. Ideally I should be able to tell my teacher that I have Asperger's, and then there would be no need to say that I have a normal IQ, trouble with group exercises, smalltalk etc. etc. With that in mind, it is not productive. It gives the wrong impression.
Thoughts?
I haven't noticed this. Maybe these folks aren't as ret*d as you think and they have had their IQ tested and it is within normal to above normal ranges. It's not the fault of the person. They were the ones with the diagnoses foisted upon them, not the other way around.
2. If they are misdiagnosed with AS or autism, what difference does that make to you?
3. Come 2013, the term 'Asperger's' may disappear anyway and we'll be included in the autism dialogue. In essence, this brings us closer to mental retardation than Asperger's. In fact, I'm sure that if they did get rid of the Asperger's terminology today, people would leave WP because they'll say, "I'm not ret*d! Get me out of here!"
But autism and mental retardation are two different things...
I do think that all of the autism-awareness going around is helping people to understand that there is a difference between those two things.
Hmm, well we all know that MR can be co-morbid with an ASD, but I think most of the so-called "retardation" in autism is caused by communication difficulties.
That being said, I cannot say I have ever met someone with Down's or other MR that claimed to be autistic. Nor am I aware of any being falsely labelled such. Sometimes the flip side, people with ASDs get the MR label. Often, actually. See communication difficulties again..
Sincerely,
Matthew
Long before I knew anything about AS, I used to work with a female programmer whose speech was really slow and... odd. Sounded a lot like retardation, but her code was far too good for her to actually be ret*d. I didn't know what to make of her. Now I'm pretty sure she's autistic.
It's ironic that you guys have been talking about Down syndrome so much, because DS and autism have a high overlap rate; autism is 25 times as likely for the DS group.
Asperger's itself is highly variable, ranging from barely noticeable to blatantly obvious.
I personally don't like being put into the Asperger's category simply because I'm verbal and semi-independent. The idea of a diagnosis is to be able to use the diagnosis to predict what a person will need--but for me, the Asperger's diagnosis often gets in the way. Rather than being a socially awkward, anxious sort of person whose major difficulties involve socialization, I'm a socially oblivious person whose major difficulties involve cognitive problems like transitioning from one thing to another or focusing on more than one thing at once. The difficulties I have are often more similar to those faced by people with "classic autism"--except that it's harder for me to get help with them, because people don't expect me to have them. And sometimes, when I do get help, they expect me to be more "low-functioning" and need more help than I actually do, or to be capable of less than I am. I'm honestly sick of it; the AS stereotype hasn't helped me much at all. Having people assume you're intelligent may flatter your ego, but if it doesn't help you get what you need, it won't do a thing for you.
_________________
Reports from a Resident Alien:
http://chaoticidealism.livejournal.com
Autism Memorial:
http://autism-memorial.livejournal.com
You asked for thoughts on this so here are mine;
First of all what do you mean by "ret*d"? ret*d can be a very broad colloquial term which I have sometimes used to refer to myself. I see myself as emotionally and socially ret*d and have mockingly described myself as such to others. I don't do it to "own" the labels or because I'm pleased about being slow socially and emotionally, I do it just to confront what were always subconscious concerns and be honest about them with myself and others (maybe in a slightly unhealthy, self deprecating way).
If you're talking about actual down syndrome or some other recognised, diagnosable condition like that then I don't see how it could be mistaken for Asperger's. I thought an IQ lower than 70 meant an autistic condition officially became LFA and was no longer considered Asperger's. If you're not talking about an actual condition but just mean "low functioning" in some particular cognitive capacity then this basically just becomes a pissing contest about who can pass a maths test or get good enough grades to go to university or something. Do you think you're better than someone who would fail that same maths test even though neither of you can look someone in the eye or make small talk? Don't you see how hypocritical that is? You probably whine to yourself about how you're misunderstood but then you turn around and sound as though you'd like some people removed from the AS diagnosed community because you think they make you look bad. You sound like several kinds of ret*d. Get over yourself.
As someone else pointed out they might be getting rid of the "Asperger's" label from diagnostics next year so I guess we'll all be ret*ds then Maybe that will thin the crowd a bit of the insecure scene-sters who write vague stupid posts about "fake Aspies" all the time or ret*ds making them look bad. Maybe next year those people will decide they were NT's all along.
That made me giggle.
I knew a ret*d girl in 7th grade. The other boys used to pick on her a lot. They called her "Rat Fink" and "Master Splinter." I felt sorry for her. Then they found out she was a tomboy and she was good at sports. Then she joined there group and started picking on ME. I was picked on by a ret*d girl every day for two years. And I was high honors back then.
I don't begrudge ret*d people though. I am a strong supporter. I watch the NFL like, EVERY Sunday.
I know this reply has nothing to do with this discussion really, but it's been my experience that they seldom ever do.
Kids used to tell me I was ret*d starting at age seven. Some would even ask me in middle school if I am or not. I did start to believe I was and I didn't even know what AS was then so I thought I was ret*d. But once I read about it, then I knew I wasn't really and when I saw what my IQ score I got in 5th grade.
_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.
Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.
I don't begrudge ret*d people though. I am a strong supporter. I watch the NFL like, EVERY Sunday.
I know this reply has nothing to do with this discussion really, but it's been my experience that they seldom ever do.
You did make an important point. You can hold on to a grudge with a cognitively disabled 7th grader for 20 years.
I don't think the question is, "What should I do about the Aspies who look ret*d?". It's, "What should I do about my own reluctance to be associated with them?"
Well put.
We're all just a brain injury away from being Intellectually disabled.
That is exactly what I thought and why I started this topic, because I have met two individuals who have downs syndrome but just tell people they have Asperger's. But here people have pointed out that those with DS can have normal IQ as well, so maybe that is the explanation. But I still think it is a miss-diagnosis.
And no, I won't moderate what I wrote any more. I must be possible to talk about this without being considered offensive. I have nothing against those who are clinically ret*d. I just find it a bad description for me (as Calista mentioned), but maybe it is to much to ask to have a label that you fit neatly into what people think about it.
That is exactly what I thought and why I started this topic, because I have met two individuals who have downs syndrome but just tell people they have Asperger's. But here people have pointed out that those with DS can have normal IQ as well, so maybe that is the explanation. But I still think it is a miss-diagnosis.
And no, I won't moderate what I wrote any more. I must be possible to talk about this without being considered offensive. I have nothing against those who are clinically ret*d. I just find it a bad description for me (as Calista mentioned), but maybe it is to much to ask to have a label that you fit neatly into what people think about it.
I think it's a bit late for "moderating'. I was just trying to help you out because I saw this coming. Told you this would backfire
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Really struggling to find a job |
10 Nov 2024, 7:08 pm |
Where to find a job that works for me |
30 Dec 2024, 10:28 am |
Does anyone find this phrase triggering? |
14 Nov 2024, 10:45 pm |
Moving to Russia to Find Work |
09 Jan 2025, 1:00 pm |