Page 3 of 3 [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

larsenjw92286
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Aug 2004
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,062
Location: Seattle, Washington

28 Nov 2006, 6:55 pm

The fact that people tend to spell things in British style has nothing to do with having AS. I know all of you British people spell "favorite" with a "u," but we spell it without the u.

For example, if I said to an American, "My favourite game show here is The Price is Right with Bob Barker," then they would act very strangely and wonder what I am talking about. For those of you British people, Bob Barker is the host of "The Price is Right" here in America and he will be until the end of this season, when he retires after 35 years as the host. He has been there since day one.

As for showing affection by chewing on people, I think that is an AS trait because sometimes, we can act weird.


_________________
Jason Larsen
[email protected]


SteveK
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Oct 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,899
Location: Chicago, IL

28 Nov 2006, 7:16 pm

blackcat wrote:
ping-machine wrote:
Catalyst wrote:
I was wondering about it because I'm reading Temple Grandin's Animals in Translation and she talks about how autistic emotion is similar to animal emotion.


In my opinion, all emotion is like animal emotion. Because we are animals.

I get very pedantic about using English words but that is because I grew up in Australia and we don't speak US English there. Or here, which is New Zealand. But I get especially fussy about -- for example -- when others talk about "people and animals" like they are so separate.

A basic syllogism. We are alive. We are multi-cellular organisms. We are not plants. Therefore we are animals.

Also when people talk about apes but they don't include humans in that group, because humans are apes. (This could turn into a rave. But I'll stop now.)


THANK you!! ! someone else who thinks that!


Humans get too much credit, and apes/chimps/etc... don't get enough. Recently, some jerk claimed that the average goldfish was smarter than a dolphin! The DOLPHINS have a known language, society, attack strategy, hunting strategy, and are kind to others like HUMANS, but humans say the little goldfish that doesn't seem to do anything is smarter!?!?!?!? YEAH RIGHT

Steve



SteveK
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Oct 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,899
Location: Chicago, IL

28 Nov 2006, 7:24 pm

BTW I USED to believe that the difference between "animals" and humans was that humans used tools to make tools. OH WELL, animals HAVE been caught using tools to make tools!

Steve



SteveK
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Oct 2006
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,899
Location: Chicago, IL

28 Nov 2006, 7:27 pm

BTW when I learned to read, some British was there with the "Aerican". I always kept it straight. I STILL know color! I might spell it colour though! 8-) Aluminum vs. aluminium is another story though.

Steve



Belfast
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Age: 51
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,802
Location: Windham County, VT

08 Dec 2006, 4:21 am

SteveK wrote:
Aluminum vs. aluminium is another story though.

That one still bugs me out when I hear it said. Took me ages to figure out that the two terms refer to same item, just that it's got an extra letter & an extra syllable in English culture. Confuses me when Brits say "what" in place of "that". I like spelling grey instead of gray, it's an aesthetic choice. I add "u" to some words (or reverse "er" into "re" sometimes), then forget which is the standard American spelling.
Juggernaut wrote:
when I write for myself, I abreviate and remove vowels whenever possible. fr instnc, rght thr I can gt rd of som vwls and you can stl tel what Im atmptng to say

I do the same, to a lesser extent, idiosyncratically & erratically.
Catalyst wrote:
I use the "five-dollar words" because... well, because they're available, and they are in fact more specific than their simpler alternatives. Some people think I'm being pedantic, but I'm just using what seems to be the right word for the moment.

I try to be exacting in my use of language, search for just the right feel to a word when choosing how to formulate what I communicate. It's useful skill, yet can get in the way of my ability to produce words bc. I get stuck when no words seem adequate/right/perfect enough.
homewitch wrote:
The correlations Dr. Grandin makes in her book are more about the significant differences that *are* present between humans (specifically neurotypical humans) and animals (specifically other land mammals.) Without bullet pointing a significant portion of the book, the main divergences come from differences in frontal lobe function and how we (NT) humans process "emotion" in a cognitive fashion, which is not done in the same way that other land mammals do. She makes a convincing case that autistic humans share a lot more in common with land mammals in terms of how frontal lobe activity and cognition affect reactions, thinking, and other activities.

I believe my emotions are more close to those of animals, because my cortex doesn't sufficiently dampen my perceptions of sensations. I'm not a creature who feels myself to be "in control" of myself, my body & mind feel how they feel. The vast amounts of thinking I do on top of that don't seem much help. Can't intellectualize/manipulate/trick self into or out of overwhelming internal states.
Catalyst wrote:
but of course I am not attempting to eat the people, just to express emotion by.... well, hugging them with my teeth.

That's a good way to phrase it. My teeth got old & fell apart, but I used to enjoy biting/"mouthing"-gently gnawing on my boyfriend's neck or shoulder, like my cat with her sock toy. It's the "I feel good around you so I'm increasing our mutually interacting surface areas" nuzzling, not the "I feel bad around you so I'm gonna' shred you" chewing attack.


_________________
*"I don't know what it is, but I know what it isn't."*