if I hear about Temple Grandin one more time...

Page 3 of 6 [ 91 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

seaturtleisland
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2012
Age: 31
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,243

16 Dec 2012, 7:07 pm

Loborojo wrote:
seaturtleisland wrote:
Marybird wrote:
You cannot stop the slaughtering of cattle. Millions of people eat beef and you cannot force them to become vegetarians.quote]

I agree with this. If we could shift 90% of the people on earth to a vegetarian diet it would stop the slaughtering of cattle because there would be no market for it but if that can be done at all it can't be done in an instant. At the moment, maybe not in the future, people want to eat meat and they can't be forced to stop. Because these people make up the market, manufacturers are going to want to produce meat in these slaughterhouse facilities. Before the system can change, the people who make up the system need to change.


There is always something that can be done. Eliminating the slaughterhomes is ideal but if that ideal can't be reached we need to do the next best thing. If we can't stop animals from being slaughtered at least we can prevent them from being tortured.


What Temple Grandin has done is reach a compromise. Yes you can have the two extremes but different people have different opinions and finding a middle ground is not hypocrisy. It is recognizing your position while being able to take into account and not step on the view points of others. If Temple Grandin found a way to eliminate the cattle industry she would've been crushing several hundred million people's own values under her boots. She wouldn't have been able to do that anyway whether you like it or not because the massive amount of meat consumers wouldn't let her.


Not everything can be perfect and ideal but there is always a compromise and there is always a next best thing. Treating the cattle humanely is the next best thing. It is the compromise.


Aren't Aspeis notorious for not compromising?
Okay, we have no way of knowing whether Temple Grandin reached a compromise intentionally even though she was Autistic or she really was a hypocrite that didn't care about the cows. Or there could've been a third possibility that since she needed support, the people who supported her had a strong enough influence that they convinced her it was more realistic to do what she did.


From my experience with my own black and white thinking I don't find it difficult to believe an aspie is capable of seeing the grey area eventually. Usually I'll start out with a very black and white extreme opinion on a subject but if I think about it long enough I'll start to ask myself questions and my black and white view will start to collapse. Once it collapses I do start to see some grey areas. A NT would see them right away but if I'll usually see them if I spend enough time reflecting on a subject. That's why I don't think it's that unlikely for someone with an ASD who spends most of her life thinking about cattle and the beef industry to eventually find a middle ground even if it takes her 10 years to do so.


Still, I admit that we have no way of knowing without actually talking to her.

What we do know is that the result was still a compromise.



starkid
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Feb 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,812
Location: California Bay Area

16 Dec 2012, 7:13 pm

seaturtleisland wrote:
What we do know is that the result was still a compromise.


Compromise is a motivation, a conscious intention, not the result of an action.



Marybird
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Apr 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,818

16 Dec 2012, 9:43 pm

starkid wrote:
seaturtleisland wrote:
Not everything can be perfect and ideal but there is always a compromise and there is always a next best thing. Treating the cattle humanely is the next best thing. It is the compromise.


You are missing the point. The point the original poster was trying to make is that wanting the cows to be treated better pre-slaughter and simultaneously holding the opinion that it's ok to slaughter them is (or appears to be) logically inconsistent. If Temple Grandin (or anyone else) thinks that it's inhumane to slaughter them, and the attempt at more humane treatment pre-slaughter was truly a compromise (one step toward achieving better treatment for the cows), that is a logically consistent approach to the treatment of the animals. On the other hand, thinking that it is ok that they are treated poorly in one case (slaughtered), but not ok that they are treated poorly in another case (how they are handled pre-slaughter) are two attitudes that appear to contradict one another.

I don't know Temple Grandin's motives, maybe you do from watching her videos or something. But, if she doesn't actually care how the cows are treated outside of her area of expertise (for example, if she doesn't care if they are eventually killed), then what she did was not a compromise. A compromise would be a conscious decision as a middle way between two competing positions on animal welfare. Maybe she doesn't care about the overall question of animal welfare, and thus did not have a conscious decision to make, and thus her acts are not the sort of compromise you are talking about.


Why are you assuming things about her motives? That doesn't make sense.



Verdandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)

16 Dec 2012, 10:12 pm

Currently, Americans consume a lot of meat, probably more than is actually healthy (I say probably, but I am sure research will back this up). At the time Temple Grandin started her work, actually promoting cutting down meat consumption was not likely to work. Yes, these animals are being slaughtered and yes it is well within reason to question the moral and ethical ramifications of using animals like this. However, Dr. Grandin's practical solution to the inhumane ways animals were treated was to find humane ways to handle them.

In the situation where animals are going to be slaughtered no matter what, Dr. Grandin's measures are worthwhile to take.

Also, there's research like this going on. That is, finding ways to grow edible meat that does not involve raising and slaughtering animals.

The question of how healthy it is to eat meat or be an ovo-lacto vegetarian is not really an argument that will gain much traction. People do things that are not the 100% healthiest thing they could do, and they will defend their decisions because at the base of it, such decisions are theirs to make.



Rascal77s
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Nov 2011
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,725

16 Dec 2012, 10:28 pm

Marybird wrote:
You cannot stop the slaughtering of cattle. Millions of people eat beef and you cannot force them to become vegetarians. Every living thing has a life cycle. We all live and we all will die. Wild animals sometimes suffer horrific deaths when captured and eaten by a predator. You cannot stop wild animals from suffering and dieing. Nature can be as cruel as it is beautiful. Life is a food chain. We all end up being consumed one way or another. Every person alive today will not be here 150 years from now. We will all be replaced by a completely new population of people. Cycles of life and death within the food chain has been the driving force of evolution,

Animal husbandry is something unique to humans. With animal husbandry, humans have control over the birth and the death (life cycle) of an animal. Some people believe that humans also have a moral obligation to see to it that those animals do not suffer and live as meaningful a life as possible. People who devote their lives to making that a reality are to be commended as heroes and don't deserve to be spoken of with contempt.
BTW I am a vegetarian.


Marybird this is my thinking on it too. You laid out the thought so well that I will just quote you instead of butchering it myself.



Marybird
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Apr 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,818

16 Dec 2012, 10:34 pm

Thank you Rascal77.



eric76
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,660
Location: In the heart of the dust bowl

17 Dec 2012, 3:45 am

Keep in mind that if mankind went vegetarian, a number of common species would likely become quite rare or even vanish entirely since there would no longer be any economic benefit to keeping them around except in zoos.



CrinklyCrustacean
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,284

17 Dec 2012, 4:14 am

I stumbled across the following meme the other day:

Image

Whether or not you find it funny, the point raised is an interesting one. Animals which are eaten by the Venus Fly Trap (the plant in the picture) die a very nasty death. According to Wikipedia, the trap is set off by trigger hairs on the inside of the lobes which form the trap. If the animal is small enough to escape from the closed trap, the trap will re-open in 12 hours, otherwise:

Wikpedia wrote:
If the prey is unable to escape, it will continue to stimulate the inner surface of the lobes, and this causes a further growth response that forces the edges of the lobes together, eventually sealing the trap hermetically and forming a 'stomach' in which digestion occurs. Digestion is catalysed by enzymes secreted by glands in the lobes.
[...]
Digestion takes about ten days, after which the prey is reduced to a husk of chitin. The trap then reopens, and is ready for reuse.


The Sundew is a related plant which traps via a sticky goo:

Wikipedia wrote:
Sundews are characterised by the glandular tentacles, topped with sticky secretions, that cover their laminae. The trapping and digestion mechanism usually employs two types of glands: stalked glands that secrete sweet mucilage to attract and ensnare insects and enzymes to digest them, and sessile glands that absorb the resulting nutrient soup (the latter glands are missing in some species, such as D. erythrorhiza). Small prey, mainly consisting of insects, are attracted by the sweet secretions of the peduncular glands. Upon touching these, the prey become entrapped by sticky mucilage which prevents their progress or escape. Eventually, the prey either succumb to death through exhaustion or through asphyxiation as the mucilage envelops them and clogs their spiracles. Death usually occurs within 15 min.[6] The plant meanwhile secretes esterase, peroxidase, phosphatase and protease enzymes.[7] These enzymes both dissolve the insect and free the contained nutrients. The nutrient soup is then absorbed through the leaf surfaces and can then be used to help fuel plant growth.

All species of sundew are able to move their tentacles in response to contact with digestible prey. The tentacles are extremely sensitive and will bend toward the center of the leaf to bring the insect into contact with as many stalked glands as possible. According to Charles Darwin, the contact of the legs of a small gnat with a single tentacle is enough to induce this response.[6] This response to touch is known as thigmonasty, and is quite rapid in some species. The outer tentacles (recently coined as "snap-tentacles") of D. burmannii and D. sessilifolia can bend inwards toward prey in a matter of seconds after contact, while D. glanduligera is known to bend these tentacles in toward prey in tenths of a second.[8] In addition to tentacle movement, some species are able to bend their laminae to various degrees to maximize contact with the prey. Of these, D. capensis exhibits what is probably the most dramatic movement, curling its leaf completely around prey in 30 minutes. Some species, such as D. filiformis, are unable to bend their leaves in response to prey.


Being squeezed to death, or being dissolved while alive, doesn't sound very humane to me.



opal
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Jul 2007
Age: 57
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,118
Location: Australia

17 Dec 2012, 5:23 am

cathylynn wrote:
CuriousKitten wrote:
cathylynn wrote:
humans don't need to eat meat. in fact, humans live more healthily and longer of they don't eat meat.


Actually, humans are omnivores. Strict vegetarianism leads to vitamin deficiencies.


tell that to the seventh day adventists who outlive you. so what if they have to take B12 and D supplements. i eat meat and i take B12 and D anyway, just for good measure. i am an MD. what are your credentials?


They also don't drink or smoke, which should be taken into account. They're also a pack of weirdos.



Loborojo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Aug 2008
Age: 65
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 1,242
Location: Negombo

17 Dec 2012, 6:43 am

Plants have nerves too, and can feel pain and think...so we shuold stop eating plants, veggies too and go extinct ourselves. :)

Or we should proceed like the native Americans who knew they had to survive cold winters and asked for forgiveness from the buffalo and told him the the neede to eat hima nd that his skin would be used for shoes, tent and clothing...this is the entire thing, we don't respect what we eat anymore...that is because we have inherited a supermarket culture. Lots of kids have never seen a real cow in their lives.

The Dalai Lama wanted to go vegetarian and did that for a sting until he went down with hepatitis and his doctor said that it wasn't for him and needed to return to his previous habits of eating meat.
A bit of hypocrisy for the monks too, as they don't even want to kill a mosquito, but ask muslems or non-Buddhists to slaugher cows and pigs for them....


_________________
Your Aspie score: 152 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 48 of 200
You are very likely an Aspie


nessa238
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2011
Age: 58
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,908
Location: UK

17 Dec 2012, 7:37 am

Cattle are going to keep being slaughtered whether some people are vegan or vegetarian or not

If they are going to be slaughtered it's better it is done in a humane way

Ideally no cattle would be slaughtered but it's a fact that if we didn't eat meat these cattle wouldn't even exist as there would be no need for them so they wouldn't have been bred for their meat in the first place ie they exist because we eat them

In life you get to realise more and more as you get older that nothing in life will ever be exactly as you want it it to be and that you will often need to compromise and accept the lesser of two evils

There's no harm at all in standing up for what you believe in and fighting to change things but in the meantime a compromise has to be accepted as that's how life tends to work



eric76
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Aug 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,660
Location: In the heart of the dust bowl

17 Dec 2012, 8:02 am

Loborojo wrote:
Plants have nerves too, and can feel pain and think...so we shuold stop eating plants, veggies too and go extinct ourselves. :)


Plants have nerves and can feel pain and think?

If you really believe that, your education related expenses were a complete waste of money.

I suspect that you are just making a joke. It's especially hard to decide if written postings on the Internet were meant sarcastically or not so I'm not whether or not you are serious.



Loborojo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Aug 2008
Age: 65
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 1,242
Location: Negombo

17 Dec 2012, 8:33 am

It is all what you believe in, dear...The native Americans saw brothers and sisters in everything...so do I and I believe. A belief which was recently proved by scientists when they see palnst come alive and grow better with classical music and 'cringe' with hardrock/heavy metal.
Long time also we believed fish couldn't feel anything? Well they do actually feel pain too when that hook gets into theri mouth or cheek.
Plants talk telepathically (to you , that is what southa american Indians say who thus discovered plants's remedies against migraines, cancer, etc). Ever heard of the book Secrets of Plants? We are all related in this cosmos and all have a nervous system..,and about education wasted, yes, lots has been wasted by teaching us the wrong things we don't need or ever use in life, cramming our brain with nonsens, but failing to teach us how to live,like survival and how not to get lost in nature...do we learn how to orientate ourselves with the stars? NO.


_________________
Your Aspie score: 152 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 48 of 200
You are very likely an Aspie


Loborojo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Aug 2008
Age: 65
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 1,242
Location: Negombo

17 Dec 2012, 9:50 am

eric76 wrote:
Loborojo wrote:
Plants have nerves too, and can feel pain and think...so we shuold stop eating plants, veggies too and go extinct ourselves. :)


Plants have nerves and can feel pain and think?

If you really believe that, your education related expenses were a complete waste of money.

I suspect that you are just making a joke. It's especially hard to decide if written postings on the Internet were meant sarcastically or not so I'm not whether or not you are serious.



Enjoy this nice piece of muzic...East meets West in passages.


http://youtu.be/iB0sXWwH_eA


_________________
Your Aspie score: 152 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 48 of 200
You are very likely an Aspie


Marybird
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 26 Apr 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,818

17 Dec 2012, 2:05 pm

eric76 wrote:
Loborojo wrote:
Plants have nerves too, and can feel pain and think...so we shuold stop eating plants, veggies too and go extinct ourselves. :)


Plants have nerves and can feel pain and think?

If you really believe that, your education related expenses were a complete waste of money.

I suspect that you are just making a joke. It's especially hard to decide if written postings on the Internet were meant sarcastically or not so I'm not whether or not you are serious.

It's fascinating to watch time lapsed photography of plants. You can see them really responding to their environment, like animals only much slower. I can relate to that. I have cognitively slow processing speed. I may be a plant (that's a joke, just so you know).



seaturtleisland
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2012
Age: 31
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,243

17 Dec 2012, 3:19 pm

Loborojo wrote:
It is all what you believe in, dear...The native Americans saw brothers and sisters in everything...so do I and I believe. A belief which was recently proved by scientists when they see palnst come alive and grow better with classical music and 'cringe' with hardrock/heavy metal.
Long time also we believed fish couldn't feel anything? Well they do actually feel pain too when that hook gets into theri mouth or cheek.
Plants talk telepathically (to you , that is what southa american Indians say who thus discovered plants's remedies against migraines, cancer, etc). Ever heard of the book Secrets of Plants? We are all related in this cosmos and all have a nervous system..,and about education wasted, yes, lots has been wasted by teaching us the wrong things we don't need or ever use in life, cramming our brain with nonsens, but failing to teach us how to live,like survival and how not to get lost in nature...do we learn how to orientate ourselves with the stars? NO.


You keep talking about native Americans but are you native? I highly doubt you are but I'm asking to be sure.

If you're not then why do you say so much about them like you're an expert?