I do realize people often need medication and so I normally hold my 'tongue' (fingers from the keyboard) on the topic. However since we were asked about the issue...I have had serious and lasting side effects from something prescribed and so have loved ones. I'm speaking from my own experience, and every body (two words) is (literally) different.
The problem is in drugs rushed to market in my opinion. Scientists used to take a lifetime to perfect a drug. One only has to watch late night TV to see some drugs that were touted last year and yet prone to a lawsuit for serious harm this year. If doctors don't know why that is, they should practice more caution. There are usually older, more time proven drugs available for the same illnesses.
Doctors tend to prescribe the newest and most expensive drugs, and Big Pharma does gift them, which should be (in my opinion, is) a conflict of interest.
Patients do ask for a side effects list and are their own best and last protection but, are not always given a list, or are argued with at time of prescription, that side effects on that (official) list are not 'real' (see my prior post) or, are given an incomplete list. (That is a doctor absolving themselves of responsibility.) No law that I know of protects patients from such behavior. In fact laws have been before governing bodies recently which would protect Big Pharma and doctors from all legal action. I don't think the laws passed.
Patients need a so called bill of rights (patient-protection laws), and a full side effects list in their language, given them after every visit (upon a prescription). Also since I know from experience and have been told by someone who worked for the reporting agency, since illnesses are often written in words patients never heard of, said side effects sheet should be fully explained at time of visit. That is not likely to happen since most doctor visits last about ten minutes. What the heck is Sjorgen syndrome and why is it a side effect of an antibiotic? Is it serious? Is it permanent? Why is it on the list from the pharmacist but not the one from the E.R.? That type of thing.
(The powers that be should) At least arm patients with the information up front. At least give them options for other medications. At least give them a liver panel which would tell if they have enough Cytochrome P450 to metabolize that medication, since most medications need that to work properly. At least adjust dosages to each patient individually instead of one dosage fits all.
I obviously have strong opinions about it, because over 90 percent of doctor visits end in prescription yet only one course in pharmacology needs be taken to graduate med school. And, for the reasons I've already stated above. Over 100,000 deaths from Rx drug ADR in hospitals alone in the USA each year.
I don't want to scare anybody. But, people here are intelligent and it can't hurt to at least find a doctor who will listen and to report any side effects to the doctor immediately.