Autism Is Not An Excuse To Do Nothing

Page 3 of 17 [ 265 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 17  Next

ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,534
Location: Long Island, New York

05 Mar 2015, 8:05 pm

Trend? more like a plague
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/278678.php

Quote:
The researchers found that 66% of participants with Asperger's reported suicidal ideation, compared with only 17% of the general population and 59% of patients with psychosis.


Asperger's patients with a history of depression were four times more likely to have suicidal thoughts and twice as likely to plan or attempt suicide than those without a history of depression, according to the researchers.
In detail, the team found that 66% of patients with Asperger's had thought about committing suicide and of these, 35% had planned or attempted suicide during their lifetime.


Quote:
The study was subject to limitations, according to the researchers. For example, it only included adults who had Asperger's diagnosed in adulthood, therefore the researchers are unable to generalize their findings to those diagnosed with the condition in childhood.


This just tears me apart and effects the tone of many of my posts since the study was released. Sometimes I get so emotional about fighting this internalized ableism I do get condescending or overly strident and for that I apologize but stopping both publicly and privately is not an option.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


Last edited by ASPartOfMe on 05 Mar 2015, 8:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

androbot01
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,746
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada

05 Mar 2015, 8:06 pm

I found it much easier to learn by studying the pictures in the book. When people tried to show me they went too fast. It was challenging because I don't have good dexterity.

goldfish21 wrote:
I am someone who works, fulfills my obligations, earns my own way through life, & has a variety of interests that occupy my time vs. spending 24/7 on a singular hobby-interest that doesn't advance me in life in any sort of well rounded way.

Maybe it wouldn't advance you, but it may someone else.

Quote:
It's my opinion that leading a more well rounded life is far more enriching than focusing on ONE hobby-interest that is, in general, perceived by others as a hobby vs. a productive thing to spend one's time on - especially at the opportunity cost of learning other things, doing & experiencing other things, advancing one's finances etc. That's who I am to make that judgement. YMMV & that's ok. :)

You're making a lot of assumptions and I'm not sure why.
But XFG is right. I'm hearing the the sound of Elsa singing "Let it Go." Lol



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

05 Mar 2015, 8:09 pm

I'm odd, in that I can't learn by looking at pictures.

I could only learn by DOING. Especially with mechanical things.

That's how I learned to drive, by DOING:

70 formal lessons lead to a failure in my road test

3 sessions behind the wheel on my own lead to me passing the road test.

I'm an odd duck that way!



B19
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,993
Location: New Zealand

05 Mar 2015, 8:14 pm

You're an active learner, while others are visual learners, some are auditory learners. They are just different learning styles that tend to be wired into people. Some people are even "active relaxers" (not me) - they can only relax by doing something active. I'm more the "curl up with a good book between catnaps" type.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

05 Mar 2015, 8:24 pm

I was lucky there were textbooks in college/university--otherwise, I don't think I would have done well.

I also followed the syllabus precisely.

I probably have some kind of "auditory processing disorder." My short-term memory is rather poor--it makes people think that I "don't listen."

I'm a staunch believer in Gardner's "multiple intelligences."



B19
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,993
Location: New Zealand

05 Mar 2015, 8:34 pm

Yes. Donna Williams lists 7 learning styles in this interesting article, which challenges the sometimes-heard claim that all auties are visual thinkers.. I have more than one of her 7 styles, and perhaps that's true of others, I don't know..

http://www.donnawilliams.net/learningstyles.0.html



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

05 Mar 2015, 8:42 pm

If I relied solely on my vision, I would be a shut-in.



B19
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,993
Location: New Zealand

05 Mar 2015, 8:46 pm

Me too!



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

05 Mar 2015, 8:50 pm

I tend to think two-dimensionally visually. And I have a linear viewpoint visually.

I'm lucky there's such things as books; otherwise, I'd be lost.

I wish there was a way, within a 30-child classroom, to accommodate all learning styles.

Technology has been a boon to many. For autistic people who do not have the power of speech, technology has been an absolute godsend. Technology has revealed genius in many.



B19
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,993
Location: New Zealand

05 Mar 2015, 8:55 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
I wish there was a way, within a 30-child classroom, to accommodate all learning styles.


Wow, wouldn't that be wonderful... the end of at least some kids being labelled "learning disabled" when all they need is to be taught in a manner that suits their own cognitive and learning style/s. Effectively the "LD" label stigmatises them simply for not being part of the normocentric group and because of some educators' ignorance about the variety of learning styles which children have.



dianthus
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Nov 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,138

05 Mar 2015, 8:55 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
I'm odd, in that I can't learn by looking at pictures.

I could only learn by DOING. Especially with mechanical things.


I learn best by doing. But I can't learn very well from having other people explain things to me. So sometimes I just have to rely on pictures.

Sometimes I can learn by watching someone else do something, but not with knitting. Too many small, fine movements that I can't follow. Even having it slowed down and explained, I can't put it all together in my mind in the right order.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

05 Mar 2015, 8:59 pm

If I wanted to learn to knit, I'd HAVE to learn by doing.



dianthus
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Nov 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,138

05 Mar 2015, 9:00 pm

Maybe children could be tested early on for different learning styles, and grouped together in classes that way? And periodically retested just in case their favored style changes?



btbnnyr
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 May 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,359
Location: Lost Angleles Carmen Santiago

05 Mar 2015, 11:46 pm

Going out of my comfort zone has been generally good for me.
iMother is verry merry berry good at needlepoint and has made me many afghans, such as the pink bunny one I have on my bed right now and the six cats one I have on my bed at home.


_________________
Drain and plane and grain and blain your brain, and then again,
Propane and butane out of the gas main, your blain shall sustain!


League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,280
Location: Pacific Northwest

06 Mar 2015, 2:15 am

kraftiekortie wrote:
I'm odd, in that I can't learn by looking at pictures.

I could only learn by DOING. Especially with mechanical things.

That's how I learned to drive, by DOING:

70 formal lessons lead to a failure in my road test

3 sessions behind the wheel on my own lead to me passing the road test.

I'm an odd duck that way!



I am also a hands on learner. I can't watch a video and learn how to do something or be told how to do something. I have to be shown it.


_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.

Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.


League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,280
Location: Pacific Northwest

06 Mar 2015, 2:19 am

B19 wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
I wish there was a way, within a 30-child classroom, to accommodate all learning styles.


Wow, wouldn't that be wonderful... the end of at least some kids being labelled "learning disabled" when all they need is to be taught in a manner that suits their own cognitive and learning style/s. Effectively the "LD" label stigmatises them simply for not being part of the normocentric group and because of some educators' ignorance about the variety of learning styles which children have.



I think the reason why some kids have a learning disability is because of their learning style. If their learning style is in the minority, they will be considered special needs because they will need accommodations to meet their needs to learn. But in reality I think they are just normal.


_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.

Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.