Passive aggressiveness...that is unconscious?

Post Reply New Topic

What on earth makes you think I was referring to YOU?

If you care to read earlier pages of this thread, I posted about the most recent time I felt myself to be on the receiving end of passive aggressive things said by an acquaintance of mine that I'm beginning to realize is a jerk, and I'm using schmuck in the following definition:

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/schmuck



I was talking about the person in my real life who subjected me to this, and that I am not incorrectly perceiving what he said to me.

On the other hand, if you WANT my post to be about you, help yourself.

.

Wow, rarebit, an idiot AND a sh!t-stirrer! And my rolling eyes was in a completely different thread.

But you sure do deserve some more in this one too, I see.

By the way, if the shoe fits.......

Er, because you had quoted me!



See how easy this signifier and signified thing is to... well, get all lol'd about!

Extremely aggressive too YOU that is!

And you, my "friend," are the perfect example of passive aggressive.

Stirring crap up while making yourself out to be the innocent one.

Nice. Real nice! You're not making yourself look any better than me, just incase you thought so, sweetcheeks.

Shall I leave you alone for a bit then?

Oh jeez...now people really are getting passive aggressive XD

Is passive aggression better than aggression?

I know that in the eyes of the law it is!

Er, and you had failed to read the rest of the thread which would have enabled to to see where that fits into the picture.

Get your kicks out of sitting around splitting hairs, mistaking things and feeling delusionally superior, do you?

And wow, only 48 posts new, as a member here, yet already being an ass. You know, if you're going to be a dick to people here, at least wait until you've been here awhile instead of picking bitchy fights right off the bat.

You've JUST JOINED this site and look what you're already doing around here.

Add to that, condescending and strangely determined to obsessively have the last word.

Help yourself, pea brain, seems to be important to you.

Last edited by BirdInFlight on 25 May 2015, 2:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

And you think you're opinion is the only one and always right, who then resorts to name calling rather than defending your own arguments, you're a straight up bully, not a philosopher reasoning others statements.

How to interpret someone else's descriptions is difficult and ambiguous, but I don't automatically believe what others tell me, esp. about behaviors of people who are not around to state their side of the story. In general, I find that both sides of a story often make sense, each side tries to represent things in their favor, and the truth is somewhere in the middle. With people I know, I usually don't automatically take their side based on their descriptions of events that happened.

I think this approach is a good one and I do it too. The truth often is somewhere in the middle. Always uncritically accepting the interpretation/description of events of the person you are talking to (in real life or on a forum) means you have to take sides and agree that the "other guy" is bad/wrong/aggressive etc. Maybe they are. Maybe they aren't. Maybe something in between. It's hard enough to sort out what happened when both parties are present to tell their side of the story (just ask anybody who works family law). But when only one party is present, there is no reason for me to automatically favor their side of the story just because they are physically present to tell it.

This thread has degenerated into name-calling and insults.

Therefore....locked.