Aniihya wrote:
To Edenthiel, there is a reason why I put in other. It is for people who are either nonbinary or can't find their option in the poll. You don't need to go on rambling on how you are offended that the first options assume a binary system. By the way sex is not the same as gender, sex is biological and gender is an identity. You could be a biological female (sex) but identify as a demifemale/neuter/trans etc. (gender). I am not going to go out of my way to write forty options because someone doesn't want me to summarize the non-binary types under other.
Thank you for your gracious reply explaining your reasons. And I understand that it is your question to be answered, worded however you wish. I assumed you were going for accuracy and so, was merely trying to pass along to you that the sort of categories used aren't really seen as accurate any more. Many polls and questionnaires are switching from gay/straight/bi/asexual to a set of two descriptors as it's much more accurate. Specifically, "What sex/gender are you", and "What sex/gender are the people to whom you are attracted" (typically with a standardized set of four or five choices for each). The labels (such as homosexual) have far too much emotional &/or social baggage & the messiness of self-identity idiosyncrasies (ie MSM vs gay), and so the data is recognized as rapidly losing accuracy.
I really should have worded it better, I apologize.
_________________
“For small creatures such as we the vastness is bearable only through love.”
―Carl Sagan