Edenthiel wrote:
Thank goodness he wasn't a gay African American trans man with a cochlear implant too, or certain media outlets would be running the biography "specials" 24/7.
That's only half sarc, half snark. Some media outlets love to jump on anything that makes a shooter, "other" so that the bulk of their audience doesn't have to do any self examination regarding how our culture treats people who are different. Far easier to scapegoat...
Right. It also comforts people because now they think they can "identify" and therefore avoid dangerous people. It's something people naturally seek following a tragedy of this kind as it gives us a false sense of security: "Okay, now I know to totally avoid people on the spectrum - then I and my children will be safe" (in this case) would be the eventual conclusion, even if that's just a subconscious thought.
So often NOT the case. Some of the most dangerous people in history have made sure to act in ways that would
not appear to be "different" and hence, dangerous. Child predators in particular come to mind here - they are often "shockingly" (because of our grooming to assume "different" is what's dangerous) were pleasant, outgoing, kind and even worked with children (teachers, boy scout leaders, community leaders of various description): model stereotypical citizens.
Others have been political leaders who were smart enough to know just how to get people to listen to and follow them. Though "smart" can certainly describe a given autistic individual, "natural leader" doesn't frequently fit that bill.
Even given such cases we
still fall back on "no, it's 'different' that's dangerous."
It also conveniently gives people who already wish to avoid the apparently cooty-ridden (half-joke/sarcasm there) "oddballs," such as Aspies, a more solid and socially accepted excuse. Now they're not being bigoted, they're just being protective of themselves and their families. It's quite convenient.