Joined: 28 May 2016 Age: 37 Gender: Male Posts: 3,953
13 Jun 2016, 9:19 pm
kraftiekortie wrote:
Nope...you don't need a criminal record.
Call them up again, and make sure the record's been expunged/sealed.
Well the disposition was corrected to "dismissed", I don't know if I can get it sealed though. My primary concern is those shady private background check sites that scrape public records. The wrong disposition could have propagated into one of those databases if their crawler was accessing the court records that day.
Bottom line, ZombieBrideXD, just because you got arrested doesn't mean you went onto Santa's naughty list. Cops are as*holes.
Last edited by r00tb33r on 13 Jun 2016, 9:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Joined: 4 Feb 2014 Gender: Male Posts: 87,510 Location: Queens, NYC
13 Jun 2016, 9:21 pm
At least it's been changed to "dismissed."
But do find out if you can get the record expunged. Speak, informally, to a criminal lawyer. Or maybe even ask the question on a legal forum. You have to name your state.
Bottom line, ZombieBrideXD, just because you got arrested doesn't mean you went onto Santa's naughty list. Cops are as*holes.
Oh no what I did was actually pretty bad and I'm extremely lucky I wasn't sent to Juvie. Assault with a deadly weapon.
_________________ Obsessing over Sonic the Hedgehog since 2009 Diagnosed with Aspergers' syndrome in 2012. Diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder Level 1 severity without intellectual disability and without language impairment in 2015.
Joined: 28 May 2016 Age: 37 Gender: Male Posts: 3,953
13 Jun 2016, 10:01 pm
ZombieBrideXD wrote:
...
Look at it philosophically: someone has to do it, otherwise it won't exist.
In middle school locker room I was pinned by a bunch of bullies. I took a swing but missed a guy's chin and whacked him right on the Adam's apple and crushed his larynx. Kid could have died. I'm kind of fuzzy regarding exactly how I didn't get into trouble for that, things could have ended very badly for me. I didn't see that kid at school ever again.
Joined: 12 Mar 2016 Age: 30 Gender: Female Posts: 2,182 Location: England
14 Jun 2016, 2:46 am
Ban-Dodger wrote:
Alliekit wrote:
This is the man and you are right. However what I said still stands he did suggest vaccines may be related and he did falsify results.
I need more concrete evidence of this because of how much media often falsifies news-reports.
Alliekit wrote:
He also did perform operations without ethical approval and he is a disgrace.
Was this from the news or are there records from him directly admitting to performing such activities ?
Alliekit wrote:
He also had money in an alternative vaccine so he had rea son to disprove it.
Name of that other Vaccine please ?
Alliekit wrote:
I couldn't be bother to go into detail. But as a scientist Dr Wakefield is one of the worst things to happen to science I have had to repeatedly study his work for the last 3 years so I know it well
What do you make of the following Article and the "damning" report of a GSK available document ? http://healthimpactnews.com/2015/u-s-me ... se-autism/ Also, I would like to know if there's some sort of mind-control phenomenon going on where blame is being put onto the vaccines, when it may just be additives/preservatives causing triggers.
Additionally, for the mother whose son was affected, your boy can be poisoned through non-vaccinated means such as from cereals as you can see in the following demonstration...
I don't media this I'd from my own studies (I just graduated) of the paper and the situation. Because it was a big deal we are taught the ins and outs of it in order to make sure it never happens again. The reason I shared a khan academy video is because they are a good learning resource.
I also have many essays and lecture notes about the subjects but it seems like overkill to share them.
Why are you so keen to disagree when there are hundreds (and I will find them for you) of journal articles and reviews that prove there is no correlation between vaccines and autism.
It was found later on hospital records and the people who performed scans for him also testified the results they actually found were different to what he reported.
Also it was a patent which was planned to be developed in the future . If you wish for more information just search Dr wakefield vaccine alternative
There is a reason the paper was retracTed. This only happes when the paper is untrue and falsified
Joined: 12 Mar 2016 Age: 30 Gender: Female Posts: 2,182 Location: England
14 Jun 2016, 2:58 am
Ban-Dodger wrote:
Alliekit wrote:
This is the man and you are right. However what I said still stands he did suggest vaccines may be related and he did falsify results.
I need more concrete evidence of this because of how much media often falsifies news-reports.
Alliekit wrote:
He also did perform operations without ethical approval and he is a disgrace.
Was this from the news or are there records from him directly admitting to performing such activities ?
Alliekit wrote:
He also had money in an alternative vaccine so he had rea son to disprove it.
Name of that other Vaccine please ?
Alliekit wrote:
I couldn't be bother to go into detail. But as a scientist Dr Wakefield is one of the worst things to happen to science I have had to repeatedly study his work for the last 3 years so I know it well
What do you make of the following Article and the "damning" report of a GSK available document ? http://healthimpactnews.com/2015/u-s-me ... se-autism/ Also, I would like to know if there's some sort of mind-control phenomenon going on where blame is being put onto the vaccines, when it may just be additives/preservatives causing triggers.
Additionally, for the mother whose son was affected, your boy can be poisoned through non-vaccinated means such as from cereals as you can see in the following demonstration...
Also governments had misunderstood scientific journal articles for years so I hardly would trust what ant government says.
There are so many papers that prove otherwise are you claiming that these papers are false?
One many suggested one tiny thing in a paper and people go mad and believe it. Hundreds of people prove Hundreds of times that receiving vaccines doesn't cause autism and yet people go "well that's clearly wrong and funded by the government".
Why belive one paper and not the hundred others. I will post these papers if you wish but just going on scholar and searching about is brings up loads of scientific research.
The correlation between vaccine and autism is due to improved methods of diagnosing autism. There is no causation. People often thing correlation means causation bit that simply isn't true.
Fact There is a correlation between autism and vaccine use There is no causation (this would be confirmed is numerous papers found the same result) There is also a correlation to the increase in population and autism. Increased air traffic also correlated with autism.
If you go on the CDC website they have the conclusive evidence also
Joined: 2 Jun 2011 Age: 1027 Gender: Male Posts: 1,820 Location: Возможно в будущее к Россию идти... можеть быть...
14 Jun 2016, 4:20 am
I am highly distrustful of Academic-Institutions unless it can be proven that they are not Corporations. I will still be skeptical of them until it can be proven that they are not being funded by Corporations. I will still be skeptical of Academic-Institutions if any of their books are being published or funded by Corporations. I trust Corporations even less than I trust governments. I take the motto : Innocent until proven guilty.
I am familiar with multiple cases of various levels of character-assassinations. I am extremely skeptical of anything that comes from the main-stream. Especially from colleges and universities (due to massive amounts of evidence pointing to them as being nothing more than indoctrination-institutions). You are free to cite the papers, but before you cite any of those papers, double-check to make sure that they are notCorporate-Funded, otherwise the paper is automatically worthless, even if published in amounts numbering into the hundreds.
Additionally, various ingredients can be found in various foods that people do not want, and the corporations are legally allowed to NOT list them as being ingredients. I am also aware of an activity called "Cooking the Books" when it comes to financial-reports (and, likewise, how can I be so sure that the Ingredients-Lists were not cooked from corporate-sources). Another information-manipulator is called : Astro-Turfing.
I am not being in disagreement, for your information, but questioning. Questioning does not equal disagreement. I do not dispute the fact that vaccines do not cause autism. What I do question is in regard to the accuracy of the character-assassinations. I have seen this pattern before so I have reason to be skeptical of all of the lambasting I have witnessed against him due to the Cult of Materialism.
For the record, much as you claim that there are hundreds of studies proving no link, I have also come across sources that cite hundreds of sourcing proving a causal-link, and allow me to quote a NON-Corporate source...
Alyssa Rose wrote:
"Dr Andrew Wakefield on Safety of MMR Vaccination. What about use of single virus vaccine? Michael Polidori responds: Dr Wakefield's hypothesis about a connection between vaccinations and autism or enterocolitis is supported by over 60 studies available at the National Institutes of Health PubMed and PMC databases and other sources of peer-reviewed publications. Find them and read them here - http://www.pastebin.com/AtwvEMVi Dr Wakefield will ALWAYS be a doctor in the eyes of people who know the truth about the harm MMR and many other vaccines cause to a small, but growing % of kids susceptible to vaccine injury. Dr Wakefield's detractors also know he is still true to the purpose and the goals that all doctors are sworn to uphold, yet they continue to relentlessly attack and persecute him publicly with deceptions deflections and lies. Proper screening is needed to reduce or eliminate the injuries and deaths we cause through mandatory, bloated and unsafe vaccine schedules. Problems include - 1. Too many vaccines given in one visit 2. Human fetal tissue debris in some vaccines (including the MMR) possibly triggering autoimmune diseases - http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbo ... able-2.pdf 3 Toxins and contaminants in some vaccines that a small % of kids are sensitive to or can't metabolize properly. The MMR package insert is the best evidence that exists that screening is needed to avoid vaccinating 100s of thousands of kids with immune problems. Read the MMR package insert here - http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_cir ... _ii_pi.pdf Merck makes Nasonex and MMR vaccine. Nasonex - http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_cir ... nex_pi.pdf Warnings in both package inserts indicate that if you are using Nasonex, a corticosteroid, you cannot be exposed to live measles virus because it could harm or kill you. If you read the MMR package insert you will see MMR vaccine is known to cause brain damage in kids who are inadvertently vaccinated. It is not much of a stretch to realize that any brain injury can lead to a diagnosis of symptoms characteristic of autism. Merck states - "Measles inclusion body encephalitis (MIBE), pneumonitis and death as a direct consequence of disseminated measles vaccine virus infection have been reported in immunocompromised individuals inadvertently vaccinated with measles-containing vaccine" I called Merck about the Nasonex and MMR issue. They verified there is a problem and they would investigate and get back to me. I am still waiting for a resolution. Transcript: http://therefusers.com/refusers-newsroo ... ed-autism/"
With that all having been said, I am NOT Anti-Vaccine, but I am HIGHLY SKEPTICAL when it comes to Main-Stream Attacks against any individual until I hear the FULL sides of BOTH stories and, for the record, I am also able to look into these controversial-topics in multiple-languages, finding that even the Russians are suspicious of vaccines, too. Also...
Once more, I need to repeat, I am NOT Anti-Vaccine, but I AM against OVER-DOSING people, against forcing injections into babies who do not even have an immune-system yet, against unnecessary shots that a healthy immune-system can fend off on its own anyway, and I'm Anti-Propaganda. Additionally, that above clip mentioned Putin, and I trust him FAR more than any corporation. Not to mention the fact that there seems to be plenty of evidence of the CDC suppressing any information on the papers that do show links between certain vaccine-components and autism. Just in case you missed the report from GSK themselves here was that paper... https://autismoevaccini.files.wordpress ... cc3a8s.pdf ...skip down to page 626, read it ALL, and then tell me that there is NO evidence for links to autism. For the record, even though I acknowledge that Thimerosol may have links to Autism, I must REPEAT, I am NOT against Vaccinations. Assuming that nobody cooked the books to hide potentially dangerous ingredients, were I to be in a place like Africa, you better damn well bet that I would take a Vaccination-Shot, because it's better risk gaining a bit of Autism than to die of an infection from a Mosquito-Bite that gives you Malaria...
Alliekit wrote:
I don't media this I'd from my own studies (I just graduated) of the paper and the situation. Because it was a big deal we are taught the ins and outs of it in order to make sure it never happens again. The reason I shared a khan academy video is because they are a good learning resource.
I also have many essays and lecture notes about the subjects but it seems like overkill to share them.
Why are you so keen to disagree when there are hundreds (and I will find them for you) of journal articles and reviews that prove there is no correlation between vaccines and autism.
It was found later on hospital records and the people who performed scans for him also testified the results they actually found were different to what he reported.
Also it was a patent which was planned to be developed in the future . If you wish for more information just search Dr wakefield vaccine alternative
There is a reason the paper was retracTed. This only happes when the paper is untrue and falsified
_________________ Pay me for my signature. 私の署名ですか❓お前の買うなければなりません。Mon autographe nécessite un paiement. Которые хочет мою автографу, у тебя нужно есть деньги сюда. Bezahlst du mich, wenn du meine Unterschrift wollen.
13 Jun 2016, 9:07 pm
