League_Girl wrote:
A funny story my dad once told at his mom's funeral was when he was a boy, this kid always picked on him so my dad went to his mother and told her and she said "You need to stand up for yourself and show him whose boss and use your fists." So one day that kid picked on him again so my husband ran after the kid like crazy holding his hands in the air and had them curled up and the kid got scared and ran to his mommy. The kid never bothered him again. Everyone including me laughed at the story. I wondered whatever happened to those days. Oh that's right, parents will sue now if your kid hurts their child or have your kid charged with assault.
Oh that's right, parents will sue now if your kid hurts their child or have your kid charged with assault.Really???? What a great idea (except they're only juveniles).
But isn't this the way it's always been??
Back around 1978 my son was accosted by two bullies on his way home from school and my son suffered a broken collarbone. We were advised the best course of action would be to either have them prosecuted criminally (yep) or sue the **** out of the parents, but that pursuing both would tend to confuse the issues. Our son chose the monetary award and the children only had school discipline (and their parent's I hope) to deal with (and, assuming they learned a lesson) no criminal record to follow them around.
It was easy to prove damages in this case...verbal bullying not so much I'm afraid.
From reading all these posts it seems the problem here is largely composed of parents who, for personal reasons, don't want to get involved, thus perpetuating the entire sordid mess.