Quote:
Earth to C2V!! !
The word"better" means "more humane" in the sentence you wrote. So you're making a distinction with out a difference.
Its not Temple Grandin's fault that most of us in the western world eat meat.
I understand that, but there is a fine line between accepting a bad situation and trying to minimally improve it, and just opposing that bad situation outright. Where does the former blur into actually supporting that bad situation? Helping it continue and thrive? In this case perhaps, by making these methods so "humane" that it assuages people of their guilt or horror over the slaughter? Whatever her intentions have been, she is making herself part of that industry, one that causes nothing but harm to animals. I don't see how an animal lover could act so.
Quote:
How could they be expected to 'contribute to the understanding of autism' in a way that might assist others, without the platform to do so?
There are plenty of platforms. They could be organizing autism support or social groups, or running fundraisers to contribute to research or perhaps respite for carers of severely autistic people, volunteering as teaching aids who may be more understanding with autistic children, or participating in studies to better understand autism, or in activism, awareness and advocacy.
There are plenty of other ways to contribute if that's what they were really after. Writing a whole book about their own life story just because they're autistic seems to be for the attention it gets them, from what I've read.
_________________
Alexithymia - 147 points.
Low-Verbal.