SaveFerris wrote:
Chichikov wrote:
I guess so. I have to get off anyway, I have a movie to watch; "Trainspotting". It's about a bunch of autists and their stimming. You should check it out, worth a watch.
Trainspotting is an awesome film but.......
Who has got autism in Trainspotting , I don't remember anyone showing signs although to be honest last time I watched it my knowledge of autism was limited to savants.
Or was that some kind of humour that went over my head.
Sorry, I thought that when they were indulging in all that ritualistic habitual heroin use that maybe they were all autistic and that it was a stim.
(yes, it was a joke that went over your head)
Aristophanes wrote:
Chichikov wrote:
Aristophanes wrote:
Finally, the appropriate term for the appropriate rhetorical device, that said it's not a fallacy.
You equated using a phrase you consider a "trite colloquialism" with a lack of evidence. You attempted to defeat the argument by attacking the person and not the argument itself, ergo it was a fallacious argument.
I won the argument a page back when you refused to provide evidence, or even stay on topic. What you quoted was just me toying with you, lol.
You've added nothing of any value to this thread, please don't drag it any more off topic than you already have.