Aaron Rhodes wrote:
elbowgrease wrote:
But your explanation does not consider FACTS, and so it can't be a valid argument.
Sorry, I meant to say facts and proper use of logic. We reach facts through logical means. It is what allows us to explain what is perceived to be inexplicable. So which side will you take? Beliefs and superstitions, or facts and logic?
Fact: I had no knowledge that my grandparents on my father's side lived in Michigan prior to finding out we were going to Michigan to meet them for the first time.
Fact: I had never met them before we got to Michigan.
Fact: I had never been to the state of Michigan before that trip.
Fact: I had no pictures of them or their house before that meeting.
Fact: I had never spoken to them on the phone.
Those are facts. That's the truth. I'm not missing anything there.