Glflegolas wrote:
As with many posters here, I'm not entirely sure how useful rating ASD as mild, moderate, or serious really is, when you consider the conditions as a whole. Here's what I mean.
Let's say George has a somewhat decent ability to socialise, albeit somewhat awkwardly, and doesn't show much of repeditive behaviour, but is so clumsy that he falls over frequently when he goes walking, and can't drive a car at all, and is so poor at math he can't make change. For reasons that I don't fully understand, autism trumps all other diagnoses (or so it seems). Even though he has great trouble in math and coordination, he'd probably get an autism diagnosis level 1.
On the other hand we have Sarah, who finds socialising so difficult she can barely speak, and shows all the stimming and whatnot associated with ASD, and is scared to death whenever she gets touched lightly. She'd probably get a Level 2 diagnosis.
But is Sarah's condition really more debilitating than George's? I'm not sure about that. The whole concept of severity isn't something that I fully understand.
No one really fully understands autism.
But in my experience level 2 has to do with need of support. How much I'm unable to do on my own. Lack of or limited independence. To what extent I need someone to look after me.