carlos55 wrote:
In light of british actress stephanie davies coming out as hfa at a late age.
Just wondered is there a link between severity and age of diagnosis?
I mean if you can go up to your 40's without anyone mentioning autism then surely the symptoms must be mild in comparison to a 2-3 year old that is suspected of being autistic?
Is there truth to this or is it really no one was spotting the signs decades ago?
The autism spectrum didn't exist until the 1990's so many went undiagnosed. Those who had moderate or severe AS were not diagnosed autistic but had other diagnoses instead. You had to be pretty severe to be diagnosed as autistic. If you had an imagination, were creative, were social, wanted friends, etc. you were not autistic and you had other diagnoses instead.
I think now the earlier you are diagnosed, the more severe it is. Of course even mild aspies will be diagnosed as children but I doubt they would be diagnosed at age 5 or be diagnosed as a toddler because everything they would be doing would be considered normal at that age and doctors don't like to put labels on kids when what they are doing is appropriate at their level. Only parents may notice something but they won't be able to get doctors to see it until there is a significant issue. Doctors don't care if it causes issues for you in the home. All kids cause issues for their parents and siblings.
Maybe someday in the future there will be better diagnosing where doctors will learn what to see to count as a symptom to diagnose autism in mild aspies unless society changes and mild aspies will no longer be autistic.
Asperger's was not considered autism when it was first put in the DSM but then shortly after about a year later, it became considered a form of autism.
_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.
Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.