Double Retired wrote:
OkaySometimes wrote:
I think the issue that gets missed by the "difference not disability" argument is that, while it is just a "difference", it can make a person less able to do the things they want or need to do. At that point, "difference" becomes "disability." A person who is paralyzed just has a "neurological difference" until they come to a building with stairs but no ramp.
Is the "wrong" skin color a disability? Lefthandedness? Being unusually tall or short? Aversion to cilantro? All can interfere with doing things you want or need to.
Obviously some people
are disabled by autism. But in the version of autism I got and at the level of severity where I live I think calling it a "disability" is an overstatement. It would be presumptuous of me to expect to be treated as if I was disabled--it would be helpful to be treated as
me. I am "impaired" at always behaving like an NT, but they would be impaired at behaving like me--we are different from each other. It appears to me I am considered "impaired" because there are a lot more of them and might makes right so I must be "wrong".
And that is a dangerous argument because it leads to this argument: Why should they have to accept your behavior? Why do you need special treatment? If you understand the social aspects, then simply adhere to them and stop being difficult. After all, you don't have a disability, you should be able to be a team player and understand the feelings of others. NTs are different, some are extraverted and other introverted, but they can get along and adapt to each other. Where does your entitlement come from?
See the problem of the difference, not disability argument.
But you do need accommodation (at least that is what you state). Just as someone in a wheelchair needs accommodation (and providing wheelchair ramps accommodates the disability, but does not eliminate it). Your argument is just because autism is not visible to others, it should not be considered a disability. Yet, you demand that people recognize and accommodate your autism.
But if you have no problems in functioning, I don't understand how you got an ASD diagnosis? The DSM-5 is clear that it must be impacting something in your life. I received my diagnosis because of real implications from ASD in my life. Sure, I am very lucky compared to others. I get the "you don't look autistic" line from time to time and people have even denied I have autism as well. Well, my meltdowns and shutdowns are real. So are my social communication problems, anxiety, and depression. Sure, I am different, but my difference is at the root of those negative impacts.
I am glad that autism for you is like being left-handed. I am sure the difference not disability argument makes sense for you. But people don't get diagnosed with ASD simply out of curiosity.