BeaArthur wrote:
I love humor that punctures the comfortable complacency of the viewer. So, Cheers was OK but Seinfeld was better, and Borat, although crude (or maybe because crude), was better still.
I seldom use humor here, except maybe in a quiet aside to one of my usual suspects, because I think it extremely likely that my humor would offend the majority of forum participants.
Heh, heh, she said pants....
I wonder how many aspies find Borat funny. It's very subtle humour. I couldn't watch all the way through. I understand the concept of satire. I get what point he's making, but it doesn't amuse me and it doesn't make me laugh.
How do you respond to it? I'm curious.
There's a British comedy about politics called The Thick of It. Peter Capaldi is one of my favourite actors ever since seeing Local Hero (which is itself not laugh out loud funny, but more whimsical), but I didn't find this particular satire in Borat amusing. I get what it's saying, but I didn't enjoy it. And I'm certainly not the target, so wasn't offended by it.
Satire is difficult to get right. The British tend to have a better grasp on it that American comedies. Though I would like to be proven wrong.
However I do find Craig Ferguson very funny and he's quite crude, so it's not the crudeness that puts me off. I think Craig is more joyous about the crudeness and he pulls it back when he's gone too far, there's no malice in it. whereas satirists are holding a big arrow going, look this is disgusting. We've taken this too far to make a point about how revolted you should be with real life hypocrisy in power.
Am I overthinking it?