Antipsychotics
Antipsychotics are also referred to as "major tranquilizers". They are supposed to be drugs of last resort to calm someone who cannot pull themselves out of a panic or fit of anger. They are, of course, routinely used on people who are merely upset.
As a matter of fact, I fully agree with most of your points.
The psychological addiction that I have mentioned in my prior post is meant to explain a scenario whereby one is helplessly and emotionally dependent on such antipsychotic / neuroleptic drugs to control one's mood / temper whilst having such a subconscious notion in mind that "with such drugs, I will be alright, without them, I will be doomed". In fact, these were the so-called ideas and concepts "inculcated" into me and others by certain psychiatrists "dealing with" our mental disorders.
QFT. I had the most horrible time getting off of Seroquel, and kept finding that I had to keep taking it in order to forget about how miserable the side effects were making me. I hated it, it made me feel dead inside (which was, really, what I wanted. I was miserable and didn't want to think about it.) It made me constantly hungry, I gained weight and hated myself for it and kept taking more so that I wouldn't have to think about it. It's the only drug I've ever taken that compounded itself that way, me needing more to deal with how miserable it was making me. If that's not addiction, I don't know what is. I don't understand how anybody can possibly claim that antipsychotics aren't addictive. If I don't take my Adderall, the problems I had previously come back; I can't concentrate, I end up with lots of anxiety because my mind wanders and I can't focus it onto something more positive. Perhaps that inability to focus on anything is a bit worse now that I've gotten used to being able to get into a book, have gotten used to being able to deal with unpleasant feelings by focusing on something else-- but all that is still just based in the root problem that was why I was prescribed the medication to begin with.
The only reason that they can claim that antipsychotics "aren't addictive" is that the side effects are so bad that nobody wants to take them. They're incredibly addictive.. they're just also profoundly unpleasant, so doctors delude themselves into thinking that just because people don't like taking them, they must not be addictive. It's a load of crap.
Any medication that tends to make people feel better is going to end up carrying the label "addictive" and any medication that makes people feel worse will be referred to as "non-addictive." It has very little to do with reality.
my docs tested over a dozen antidepressant and antipsychotic meds on me to try to control my anxiety. side effects were so severe they kept switching me. I eventually became so sick I ended up having to have thousands of dollars of tests to make sure I didn't have cancer, and it took over a year to start feeling somewhat normal.
my hand tremors are worse than they were before I took all those drugs. now I'm afraid all the convulsions and muscle tics I suffered for years indicated something more serious. now I'm angry about it. what if my doctors made my hand tremors worse? that effects my quality of life worse than depression, frankly.
my son's dad had him on lamictal and abilify to control "bipolar" (which I don't think my son has and my ex gave bogus reports of his symptoms to get his dosages increased). my son came back to live with me, his anxiety was so high he was almost non-functional. I got him weaned off the lamictal and he's doing a lot better, but I want him off the abilify because I'm terrified what it will do to his mind and body. he's a CHILD for god's sake!
at this point in my life I find all long-lasting mood drugs suspect. until brain chemistry can be directly tested to know what drug and in what dose will be best, addictive mood-altering drugs should be reserved for the worst cases.
I think we're being done a disservice, anyway. brain drugs only really work in conjunction with behavioral modification, either by self or with the help of therapies. they aren't a cure in and of themselves and should really only be looked at as short term assists to cognitive therapies for people who can handle them.
not addictive...
google search results for antipsychotics are not addictive
http://www.google.com.au/search?q=antip ... =firefox-a
link: http://www.mydr.com.au/mental-health/an ... edications
-----
google search results for antipsychotics ARE addictive:
http://www.google.com.au/search?q=antip ... =firefox-a
looks like the only link with info supporting that comes from...oh, a post in THIS THREAD in wrong planet.
*shrug*
And you'd have seen why if you'd read the contents of the thread..
i did.
Well, I guess there's nothing left to say, huh?
At this point, it's becoming completely impossible for me to read your messages and believe that you're not being deliberately inflammatory. Guess it's time to stop trying.
And you'd have seen why if you'd read the contents of the thread..
i did.
Well, I guess there's nothing left to say, huh?
At this point, it's becoming completely impossible for me to read your messages and believe that you're not being deliberately inflammatory. Guess it's time to stop trying.
o....k.
but just keep in mind, the only thing i did was provide information to support my opinion. nothing infammatory about it, in fact i was EXTRA CAREFUL not to be. so i'm not worried.
I think what some are calling addiction is actually withdrawal symptoms from the discontinuation of antipsychotics. Withdrawal symptoms is a part of addiction, but is not the only part of addiction....at least according to the DSM-IV TR and ICD 10.
You need 3 or more:
* TOLERANCE
* WITHDRAWAL
* LARGE AMOUNTS OVER A LONG PERIOD
* UNSUCCESSFUL EFFORTS TO CUT DOWN
* TIME SPENT IN OBTAINING THE SUBSTANCE REPLACES
SOCIAL, OCCUPATIONAL OR RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES
* CONTINUED USE DESPITE ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES
You could have withdrawal and unsuccessful efforts to cut down, but I'm not sure what other criteria could be filled. I can't foresee anyone actively doing any of the other criteria.
This is at least my interpretation of the additive vs. not additive debate.
Okay, jumping in late and adding my points:
1. Antipsychotics can be effective for other conditions than psychosis. The neurochemical effects of most of these drugs are not fully known, and neither is the neurochemistry behind schizophrenia, autistic irritability, mania, and whatever these drugs are used for. Therefore, psych meds are pretty much a sake of trial and error with different durgs that might work for your symptoms. As a side note, some autisitcs *do* have psychotic symptoms or even full-blown psychosis.
2. As for what autistic symptoms antipsychotics are effective for, the main symptom is irritability (ie. meltdowns). The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Risperdal and, last week, Abilify for this purpose in children. Of course, the risk is here that children (and adults with poorer intellectual/communicative functioning) get "drugged into compliance".
3. As for other symptoms (anxieyt, sensory overload, sleep problems, etc.), I know people who are on antipsychotics for these, but I don't know if there are any well-designed studies on autistics for these symptoms. (There are single-case reports [do a PubMed or PubMedCentral search] and I remember coming across at least one study examining the possible effectiveness of Risperdal for autism "core symptoms", but I don't remember which study it was and I don't remember the conclusion.)
4. Antipsychotics are not technically addictive, but as someone else pointed out, psychological dependence may occur int he sense that someone doesn't learn alternative coping skills. Same goes, by the way, for depressed people on SSRIs; they are as effective as psychotherapy, with the one difference that you have to continue taking your meds and you don't have to continue visiting your therapist. Tolerance for antipsychotics doesn't develop in everyone.
5. Side effects vary greatly depending ont he individual. Statistically speaking, the first-generation drugs hav emore movement side effects (tardive dyskinesia, acute dystonia, acathisia, etc.), and the second-generation drugs cause more weight gain/metabolic changes (which are risk factors for diabetes and cardiovascular disease). As for the "sudden death" risk, this is extremely rare, but is indeed a risk mostly with the second-generation drugs (I seem to remember Terlect [sp?] is known for this specifically). I was told by someone on an autism list back when I was on an antipsychotic that you're supposed to get a baseline ECG, but I never got one and don't know of anyone else who did.
As for my own experience: was on Risperdal for a few months in 2007, mostly for meltdowns. The situation was in itself quite strange in that it was logical that I was having these meltdowns (I started ont he drug a week before a move into independent living for the first time and university in a different city, etc.), but when I was offered the drug I thought really that move is going to happen anyway and I'd better be calm then. I don't think the drug was quite effective, but I can't be sure since so much changed along with going ont he meds (the move etc.). I still had huge, getting-me-picked-up-by-police meltdowns when on the drug (I was on only 1mg/day but my doc didn't want to increase it). I stopped after a few months and dont'know whether I had withdrawal or relapse; I did have my major crisis that had me hospitalized 4 weeks after stopping the drug, but I've told two psychiatry residents and one psychiatrists and asked the two residents specifically about going back on meds, and none ever came back to me about it. As for side effects, I had a little dizziness but that was tolerable. I also had my heart racing for no apparent reason, but three doctors dismissed it as "stress" without ever having examined me and one of them even said it couldn't possibly be from the Risperdal (uh-huh, it's freaking in the *patient* leaflet!) and another (the psychiatrist who originally prescribed it) said it couldn't be the Risperdal because I firs thad it the third, not the first (uh-huh, nothing in eithe rthe patient leaflet or the official physician guide that says this side effect has to start ont he veyr first day). Would I consider goign back on an antipsychotic? Not sure (not that it was ever suggested to me, but). I'm sometimes really jealous of autistics for whom Risperdal (or some other antipsychotic) actually works, but on the other hand I'd like as few pills as possible due to the side effects.
1. Antipsychotics can be effective for other conditions than psychosis. The neurochemical effects of most of these drugs are not fully known, and neither is the neurochemistry behind schizophrenia, autistic irritability, mania, and whatever these drugs are used for. Therefore, psych meds are pretty much a sake of trial and error with different durgs that might work for your symptoms. As a side note, some autisitcs *do* have psychotic symptoms or even full-blown psychosis.
2. As for what autistic symptoms antipsychotics are effective for, the main symptom is irritability (ie. meltdowns). The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Risperdal and, last week, Abilify for this purpose in children. Of course, the risk is here that children (and adults with poorer intellectual/communicative functioning) get "drugged into compliance".
3. As for other symptoms (anxieyt, sensory overload, sleep problems, etc.), I know people who are on antipsychotics for these, but I don't know if there are any well-designed studies on autistics for these symptoms. (There are single-case reports [do a PubMed or PubMedCentral search] and I remember coming across at least one study examining the possible effectiveness of Risperdal for autism "core symptoms", but I don't remember which study it was and I don't remember the conclusion.)
4. Antipsychotics are not technically addictive, but as someone else pointed out, psychological dependence may occur int he sense that someone doesn't learn alternative coping skills. Same goes, by the way, for depressed people on SSRIs; they are as effective as psychotherapy, with the one difference that you have to continue taking your meds and you don't have to continue visiting your therapist. Tolerance for antipsychotics doesn't develop in everyone.
5. Side effects vary greatly depending ont he individual. Statistically speaking, the first-generation drugs hav emore movement side effects (tardive dyskinesia, acute dystonia, acathisia, etc.), and the second-generation drugs cause more weight gain/metabolic changes (which are risk factors for diabetes and cardiovascular disease). As for the "sudden death" risk, this is extremely rare, but is indeed a risk mostly with the second-generation drugs (I seem to remember Terlect [sp?] is known for this specifically). I was told by someone on an autism list back when I was on an antipsychotic that you're supposed to get a baseline ECG, but I never got one and don't know of anyone else who did.
As for my own experience: was on Risperdal for a few months in 2007, mostly for meltdowns. The situation was in itself quite strange in that it was logical that I was having these meltdowns (I started ont he drug a week before a move into independent living for the first time and university in a different city, etc.), but when I was offered the drug I thought really that move is going to happen anyway and I'd better be calm then. I don't think the drug was quite effective, but I can't be sure since so much changed along with going ont he meds (the move etc.). I still had huge, getting-me-picked-up-by-police meltdowns when on the drug (I was on only 1mg/day but my doc didn't want to increase it). I stopped after a few months and dont'know whether I had withdrawal or relapse; I did have my major crisis that had me hospitalized 4 weeks after stopping the drug, but I've told two psychiatry residents and one psychiatrists and asked the two residents specifically about going back on meds, and none ever came back to me about it. As for side effects, I had a little dizziness but that was tolerable. I also had my heart racing for no apparent reason, but three doctors dismissed it as "stress" without ever having examined me and one of them even said it couldn't possibly be from the Risperdal (uh-huh, it's freaking in the *patient* leaflet!) and another (the psychiatrist who originally prescribed it) said it couldn't be the Risperdal because I firs thad it the third, not the first (uh-huh, nothing in eithe rthe patient leaflet or the official physician guide that says this side effect has to start ont he veyr first day). Would I consider goign back on an antipsychotic? Not sure (not that it was ever suggested to me, but). I'm sometimes really jealous of autistics for whom Risperdal (or some other antipsychotic) actually works, but on the other hand I'd like as few pills as possible due to the side effects.
As for side effects, I had a little dizziness but that was tolerable.
"I also had my heart racing for no apparent reason, but three doctors dismissed it as "stress" without ever having examined me and one of them even said it couldn't possibly be from the Risperdal (uh-huh, it's freaking in the *patient* leaflet!) and another (the psychiatrist who originally prescribed it) said it couldn't be the Risperdal because I firs thad it the third, not the first (uh-huh, nothing in eithe rthe patient leaflet or the official physician guide that says this side effect has to start ont he veyr first day)"
Actually, I had been instructed by one of my psychiatrists several years ago to take Risperdal before and basically apart from the far more serious neuromuscular / neurological side effects of Tardive Dyskinesia (especially the chronic purposeless rapid involuntary and uncontrollable eyelid-twitching / eye-blinking) and Akathisia (A movement disorder characterized by a feeling of inner restlessness and a compelling need to be in constant motion as well as by actions such as rocking while standing or sitting, lifting the feet as if marching on the spot and crossing and uncrossing the legs while sitting. People with akathisia are unable to sit or keep still, complain of restlessness, fidget, rock from foot to foot, and pace - http://www.medterms.com/script/main/art ... ekey=33264 ), I had also experienced such dizziness, and rapid heart-beating and heart-racing symptoms regularly and frequently as a result of taking Risperdal.
As such, please refer to the follows :
What are the possible side effects of risperidone / risperdal ?
Get emergency medical help if you have any of these signs of an allergic reaction: hives; difficulty breathing; swelling of your face, lips, tongue, or throat.
Stop using risperidone and call your doctor at once if you have any of these serious side effects:
fever, stiff muscles, confusion, sweating, fast or uneven heartbeats;
restless muscle movements in your eyes, tongue, jaw, or neck;
tremor (uncontrolled shaking);
trouble swallowing; or feeling light-headed, fainting.
as excerpted from the website :
http://health.yahoo.com/mentalhealth-me ... ideeffects
Subsequently, when I notified the related psychiatrist of all these symptoms, the follows were his replies :
For my chronic rapid involuntary uncontrollable purposeless eyelid-twitching / eye-blinking, his reply was : "Since I am just a psychiatrist and not an eye doctor, I couldn't possibly know what has really happened to your abnormally blinking eyes."
For my dizziness which I experienced most of the times, his reply was : "I would suggest you to take a MRI brain scan for that since that's not really the area of my psychiatric expertise."
For my rapid heart-beating and heart-racing which just get worse from time to time as well as for the symptoms of my Akathisia, his reply was : "Since I am not a cardiologist or a neurologist, I would not be able to give you any diagnosis of what you are showing and telling me now."
Subsequently, he just said and assured to me that " there is absolutely 100 % nothing wrong at all with all the medications that I have given to you and they are definitely 100 % free of any side effects but possess only curative effects that will certainly get you 100 % cured in the end as long as you take them regularly and continually like what I have instructed to you" .
Coincidentally, such stereotyped scenarios also tend to be ones experienced by numerous many other persons seeking treatments for their mental disorders from all such so-called "psychiatrists"
As such, psychiatrists, by virtual of the related professional status accorded to them by their medical professions, are really entitled to shirk all the medical responsibilities owed to their paying patients by exploiting on their ignorances and misleading them while taking them as nothing but money-spinners to serve their various cost-cutting and profit-maximising ends totally, selfishly, shamelessly and consciencelessly at the expenses of the health cares and the very lives of their own paying patients ?
I got Dogmatil 50 mg in 2009 (Antipsychotic), it helped me w/ anger issues and around a year after that in 2010 I started 2 take the train and bus alone for frist time. and I started to find it easier to be social at the school I went to but then I was told I needed 200 mg/100 mg over the week and I started 2 over-eat and got fat and I was sleeping all the time and I often happen to go eat at Mcdonalds near the school and that was even worse when on Antipsychotic at the same time. then in 2012 they told me they no longer sale 50 mg or 200 mg dogmatil and made me take 400 mg 200 mg/400 mg every week, then in 2014 I ended up being nearly 199 ibs heavy and wore size 38 waist in jeans. then I spoke to my doctor in late summer of 2014 and he was worried about I wanted to go back to take 200 insted of 400 like I used to because the common user of the drugs takes FAR more like 600 mg to 3200 mg if they have schizophrenia, and I had 2 tell him I do NOT have schizophrenia but autism and then I went back to take 200 mg and I lost some wight and in 2 months after I wore size 36 waist jeans. in 2015 I talked 2 my doctor about stopping taking dogmatil but after 5 months I had very big mood swings and anger issues and too much thinking and worring in my brain and then by late 2015 I only took like 50 mg of dogmatil (broke a 400 mg pill down to 50 mg) and then by early 2016 we found out I should take dogmatil only 3 times a week and 200 mg and today I have lost a lot of wight and wear size 33 and 34 waist jeans and wight around 157 ibs. taking very little dogmatil make it easy to handle anger but at the same time make it easier not 2 over-eat but after 2 days if not taking it I can get a little headace.
I am taking Quetiapine Fumarate to combat insomnia. It helps, before taking it I was lucky to sleep 4 hours and that was with waking up 2 times. Now I sleep 6 to 7 hours. Still waking up 3 or 4 times but able to get back to sleep where without it I can't. Still working on dosage to give me a solid uninterrupted 7 to 8 hours of sleep.
Only troubling side effect for me is constipation. Taking a gentle laxative to balance that.
Also on Valium, to help with sleep with the Quetiapine at night and during day if a panic occurs. Since we increased the dose of the Quetiapine haven't needed the Valium the day time to often.