Neither Aspie Nor NT, but somewhere in between
And also: Asperger's was added as a diagnostic entity due to the fact that there was many, many individuals who were clearly autistic, but they lacked the broad cognitive impairment that is common in autism, and they had the ability to speak fluently in a social/mechanical setting (compared to classic autism); this led to them being unable to meet the diagnostic criteria for autism.
If you follow this pattern, I'm sure there are people who have "mild, mild" autism (there are).
wilco- I do see you're point here, but whilst they might not have a label, most don't not have 'nothing' if you see what i mean. I dont know, i think perhaps i am complating myself here.
xx
I think almost everyone has something. neurological, physical whatever. "normal" isnt normal as in that is how everyone should be. normal dexcribes having nothing at all. if Aspies would be normal, then NTs would get a special name. but because WE live in an NT world, WE are the smaller population so WE get a name and have to adapt. adapt to what? NTs. everybody has to adapt to NTs. I can't say I like it, and I strongly agree that having asperger or something else no matter what does NOT mean you're not normal.
I must not have Asperger's then, because I cannot find this test. Everyone else seems to know about it: is AS necessary to be able to find this test? I can find lots of other ones, but don't see a WP one. Anyone?
P.S. The first time I saw it, I figured NT meant the iNtuitive Thinker type from the MBTI:
http://look.net/success/NT
http://morriscat.50megs.com/type/nt.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MBTI
and that people were saying NT was sorta like mild Asperger's. After all, if you read descriptions of the MBTI NT, it should sound familiar:
"Focus on possibilites and handle them with impersonal analysis. Thus they tend to become logical and ingenious and find scope for their abilities in theoretical and technical developments."
It's in the member only board. http://www.rdos.net/eng/Aspie-quiz.php
I think it may be that some AS tendency people have normal type NT functioning, but this has been very largely drowned out by the AS systemising going on in their brains. These people may be able, as I have very fortunately been, to escape AS tendency (see http://unlearningasperger.blogspot.com/)
However there may be others who have no or extremely little NT type functioning - it is proving much harder for these to find any NT functioning when they reduce their systemising.
poopylungstuffing
Veteran
Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,714
Location: Snapdragon Ridge
To me, NT is sorta in the eye of the beholder. I spend more time observing people than really interracting with them...and in observing people I sometimes notice (somewhat superficially) with what sort of ease they seem to interract with others and with their surroundings...it is on this basis that I will make the assumption that certain people..or the majority of certain crowds..are NT...until proven otherwise...which seldom if ever happens(i help run an art and performance venue, so am privy to alot of people watching)
For instance I will assume that the gaggle of squealing teenaged girls in trendy clothes who all go into the bathroom at the same time are NT...They seem to know how to follow the protocol of being a squealing teenaged girl...they speak each-others language...subscribe to the same system of taboos and whatnot.....(whether or not this is actually the case)
Human behavior really does flail out in all directions. Identifying people as "Neurotypical" based on the observation of their ease of social interraction and capability of "group think" does not necc. mean that they are "normal" or "sane" or even "neurotypical"
I regard my sister as being NT...based upon her lifelong subscription to certain social protocols and her desire to "fit in" and ability to do so...but she has displayed certain mental problems her whole life.
Blah blah blah....i hope i am not saying something really stupid or short-sighted here.....
Back to the topic:
I do not have an AS diagnosis...I don't know if I would be able to get one. There are not many good and/or affordable resources in my area that I know of...Just getting my adult ADD diagnosis was hell. I spend so much time on this board because I have alot in common with people who have AS.
I have had developmental problems since I was a kid...I have developmental problems as an adult...otherwise it would not be an issue..
I have no idea how AS I actually am. I am less functional than some on the board...and maybe more functional than others..I am not sure.
Perhaps my dysfunctional behaviors are learned and not neurological...as it has been suggested to me by people who think I don't have AS...
who knows?...sorry for the ramble....
For those who are "unsure", this is the criteria that a psychologist at Attwood's used to give me a label; it shouldn't be too hard to apply it to yourself (it's closer to Asperger's original work than the DSM-IV-TR):
1.Severe impairment in reciprocal social interaction (at least two of the following)
(a) inability to interact with peers
(b) lack of desire to interact with peers
(c) lack of appreciation of social cues
(d) socially and emotionally inappropriate behavior
2.All-absorbing narrow interest (at least one of the following)
(a) exclusion of other activities
(b) repetitive adherence
(c) more rote than meaning
3.Imposition of routines and interests (at least one of the following)
(a) on self, in aspects of life
(b) on others
4.Speech and language problems (at least three of the following)
(a) delayed development
(b) superficially perfect expressive language
(c) formal, pedantic language
(d) odd prosody, peculiar voice characteristics
(e) impairment of comprehension including misinterpretations of literal/implied meanings
5.Non-verbal communication problems (at least one of the following)
(a) limited use of gestures
(b) clumsy/gauche body language
(c) limited facial expression
(d) inappropriate expression
(e) peculiar, stiff gaze
6.Motor clumsiness: poor performance on neurodevelopmental examination
(All six criteria must be met for confirmation of diagnosis.)
They kinda fudged the last one in my case (6), i.e., I didn't have a "neurodevelopmental examination".
poopylungstuffing
Veteran
Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,714
Location: Snapdragon Ridge
It now seems like NT no longer means someone who isn't on the spectrum. It now means someone who doesn't have a nuerological disorder or syndrome.
To be not considered NT you have to have:
Mental retardation
Schizophrenia
ADD/ADHD
Non verbal learning disorder
I can't think of anymore.
Is dyslexia considered not an NT either, I'm not sure. How about depression or Bipolar or any depression disorder? Are they not considered NT either.
And I'm sure brain damage wouldn't be considered NT. If the part of their brain is effected where we are so it gives them the same traits, then they're not NT. So maybe my boyfriend isn't an NT either. Brain damage can also cause MR too.
I've heard that definition of NT as well.
Tim
_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!
Now proficient in ChatGPT!
there is a great post by ZanneMarie that may help you clarify - http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt52980.html
I have no clue if I fit the criteria or not. I didn't even understand all of it. "On others" for example. What does that mean? I know it doesn't literally mean I am on someone. That wouldn't make any sense if it was an aspie thing. Who on earth would do that? A crazy person perhaps or someone who likes jumping on people or climbing on them.
And do I appreciate social cues,?I don't even care for them. Does that mean I don't appreciate them? I don't even know what they are. I expect people to tell me how they are feeling and what they want from me like if I am talking too much or they want me to lower my voice, I want them to be straightforward but not nasty to me but be nice.
I hate it when I can't understand criterias fully. Does that mean there is something wrong with me?
The evidence I've seen so far seems to indicate that I'm somewhere in the middle ground territory between "hallmark aspie" and neurotypical.
Here is my result for rdos's test. So am I borderline? You decide.
I think I probably have Asperger's, but relatively mildly compared to many I've read about too.
My scores on those Aspie type quizzes kind of back that up as well (36ish on the one, 120-140ish on the other, depending on the revision), while others are 40s and 50s on the one and 160+ on the other.
Like some others have responded in this thread, I have a job, can do social interactions and things, but I have trouble if I don't know pretty much exactly what's expected of me in an interaction, and it's generally draining on me. I don't know how to deal with freeform social events, so avoid them so I don't make a fool of myself. And basically at work I stick to myself, and don't really know what's going on. I've been making a conscious effort the last few years to say "hi" to people and that sort of thing though.
Just FYI and all, the social impairment of Asperger's is no different to classic autism, people seem to forget this.
Spokane_Girl, that generally means that you impose your routines on yourself, or on others, i.e., you have to dress yourself a certain way, or you need your mother to prepare your food a certain way.
You have the lack of appreciation of social cues thing down (you don't know them at all so you won't recognize them when people display them to you).
I've never seen it defined as being at the very end, just high. And just because it may have been defined that way doesn't mean they would know for sure. How would they know if a person is too high to be given a definate diagnosis? It's a spectrum. I side with the people that think it tapers down to nothing, not ending abruptly at a specific point. And it expresses differently in different people, so some traits are far more obvious than others.
I wonder if some of my OCD stuff would actually fit into the AS related routines. And certainly I can be freaked out for no particularly good reason if things don't go exactly as I had anticipated them (plans changing, etc. can really freak me out, though somewhat less so now that I understand that I'm going to be freaked out by change).
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Aspie friendly socks |
15 Oct 2024, 11:50 pm |
Have you been in a romantic relationship with another Aspie? |
23 Nov 2024, 12:38 am |
Aspie dating success stories |
31 Oct 2024, 6:22 pm |
My experience dating a fellow aspie |
27 Aug 2024, 9:09 am |