Wolfpup wrote:
-Besides containing mercury, it gives off ultra violet light, like the sun. It's supposedly not much, but I've read some English studies that show it does increase cancer risks just slightly, and some UV light does get out.
Florescent lights actually generate UV light as their primary thing. The UV light hits a coating on the inside of the glass that converts the UV to visible light-not not both UVA and UVB, and not absolutely 100% of it.
The locations you mentioned are all probably lit by florescent lights, and your computer monitor if it's LCD probably uses a florescent backlight (or if it's CRT that would be just as bad with shooting high energy junk at you).
There are a handful of LCD screens starting to come out that use LED lighting instead of florescent, which I assume doesn't produce much of anything but visible light. I assume they SHOULD be safer, and I wonder if they won't bother people with florescent sensitivities?
I'm also concerned by the law that's been passed in the U.S. and Australia banning normal incandescent bulbs. What effect is that going to have on people with these sensitivities, and on cancer rates for that matter?
living increases cancer rates, that is not my quote, that is from a doctor I know.
I used to work doing custom picture framing and preservation of artwork. This taught me a fair amount about fading of artwork due to acid (in the paper) and UV rays. All lighting gives off UV rays, it is just the degree of which they emit the rays that each type of bulb differs and even that isn't very much of a difference to anyone but us aspergians.
Moderate amounts of UV rays are not harmful to a person's skin and do not cause cancer. In fact, without UV rays, your body won't produce some of the vitamins that it needs to produce to keep your body strong. Also, the main reason we have skin is because we live in a place where we have UV radiation (that and microbes).