Is anyone bothered by people using bad grammar?

Post Reply New Topic

I'm pretty tolerant of poor grammar in speech, especially now that I'm not in school anymore and don't hear it very often. Slang never bothered me much, but ebonics just makes me laugh.

Improper grammar in text just drives me nuts, but I'll try to avoid correcting people unless we're having an argument. Nothing like some guy trying to prove his incorrect point while butchering contractions in the process, then I throw it back in their face and they go silent. Passive aggressive, I guess?

I think what I hate the most is when people try to spell things KIND OF like how they sound...my latest pet peeve is "would of" instead of "would've", and etc. I've even seen it in two professionally published works It's in this little comic book that comes with the special edition of Escape from New York, and I also found it in one of Thomas Harris's books...can't remember which one.

I don't like bad grammar, but I am not a grammar nazi.
I don't mind grammar being corrected to much but I do not like it when people pick on others because of small mistakes or simple mistakes or any type of mistakes really, not many people seem to take into consideration that some people struggle or have learning disabilities etc. There can be some really mean people.
But yes, I do get annoyed by bad grammar, particularly by double negatives and things like 'baby lambs' which doesn't make sense.

It depends on the situation

I can't tell you how many times several individuals torment me based on the proper and correct use of grammar as, seen through my posts,emails, etc.. I really try my utmost best when composing things to come across clearly in what the meaning of my writings are without causing confusion due to mis-spellings or other verbal wrongs. Simply put, I'm not great at writing things these days nor probably have unless your taking in some people from various web portals whom for reasons beyond my logic think I should be a poet or such. I conclusion of this post may it be known that as long as people try to make themselves understand and known is what really counts...

ProfessorX

I admit that poor grammar does drive me up a wall. However, when I hear it, I remind myself that someone may be speaking English as a second language, or has a learning problem, or just had bad teachers in school. I try to give people the benefit of the doubt.

I've also found that non-native speakers of languages tend to use better grammar. That's not to say they have a better command of the language; It's much harder to master the subtleties of butchering a language, than to learn the basic structure. I was often told often in my Russian courses, that a Russian could easily identify a foreigner, because they spoke proper Russian.

When someone online consistantly omits punctuation and capitalization, or writes as though they're text messaging their girlfriend, I usually ignore them. If someone doesn't care enough about what they're saying to communicate clearly, I assume they don't have anything of value to say. This doesn't include deliberate corruptions for the sake of humor (I can haz cheezeburger?).

I do not get annoyed by 'bad grammar,' whatever that is meant to be. It's human nature to criticise other people for their 'sloppy' or 'lazy' use of language, but we never bother to look at our own. Besides, the main purpose of language is to communicate effectively with other people. I am not condoning wholesale usage of non-standard words or grammar at all times, but understanding what the other person is saying is the crucial thing, not the intricate workings of their way of speaking or writing.

I for one am discouraged by the growth of 'Grammar Nazis' on the Internet. I am also appalled by the claims that non-native speakers can speak 'better' English than native speakers. I have no doubt that many non-native speakers can speak English fluently, but learners of a second language are usually taught a style of language that nobody really uses. Nobody speaks pure Standard English, and they shouldn't have to. Standard English is an artificial concept which is meant to be a middle ground for all speakers, but the dialect of none.

Nobody really talks in leet-speak or txt tlk so any fears that the English Language is going to the dogs are completely unfounded. Hell, the Romans abbreviated when they wrote graffiti, and that's not what killed the Latin language.