sartresue wrote:
Casting a spell topic
I come from a generation when the rules of grammar and proper spelling were much more rigorously enforced.
It would be interesting to research why there has been a relaxing of rules.
The truth is, it was only in the 18th and 19th century that rules of grammar were truly strictly enforced. In school, children were told to follow numerous arbitrary and useless rules and they had these rules drilled into their heads from an early age. Breaking any of those grammar rules would result in a whack on the wrist -one split infinitive, one whack. Two split infinitives, two whacks, and so on.
Nowadays, linguists realise that language is in constant state of change, and there's nothing anyone can do about it. Enforcing grammar rules such as not using split infinitives or placing prepositions at the end of a sentence has become less rigorous because, frankly, it's pointless. Infinitives have been split and prepositions have been placed at the end of sentences a long time before the rules were formulated (late 18th c.) So nowadays the focus is more on good style than blindly obeying rules. Sometimes it's bad style to split an infinitive, but sometimes not doing so makes a sentence ambiguous. How can you change 'to boldly go where no man has gone before?'
Thirdly, what most people call 'bad grammar' on the Internet is anything that includes abbreviations or words being missed out (ellipsis.) Many people would say that '
cn sum1 show me how 2 do dis' is bad grammar, but it's actually grammatically correct. The only thing that separates it from standard English is that many of the words have been shortened. So it's just the spelling that's non-standard.
FIN.
_________________
"Never try to teach a pig to sing. It wastes your time and annoys the pig."