Do you think Asperger's Syndrome is over diagnosed?

Page 3 of 7 [ 112 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next


Is AS over diagnosed?
Yes 37%  37%  [ 52 ]
No 63%  63%  [ 89 ]
Total votes : 141

LePetitPrince
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Mar 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,464

17 Aug 2008, 8:18 am

b9 wrote:
Aurore wrote:
Who the hell is an Aspie wannabee? I think you're seriously overestimating the 'appeal' of our condition.


i do not know any people in my life that have asperger syndrome.
i never met another AS person.
i think this means it is rare.

but i post on other AS forums.
there seems to be a never ending stream of people who are self diagnosed.

some are accepted with open arms, and then they go on to dominate and change the flavor of that forum.

they seem so well adjusted in ways that i am not, and they also seem to be manipulative.
they invite members to parties and barbecues, and they talk just like i hear NT people talk at the shops.

i think that there are some people who like the "innocence" of asperger people, and then want to fit theirselves in with that by saying they are also asperger.

they may identify with what AS people say, but that does not make them AS.
but some are prone to act like an AS person just to be involved.

i have seen three asperger people in my correspondence on the net.

i am friends with them, and i identify with their thoughts so much that i truly believe they are AS.

i do not trust anyone who just sits on an available seat and says that is where he is supposed to be.



Aurore wrote:

Just because other Aspies aren't like you, doesn't mean we're not Aspies.
And as always severity varies.
Most of the misdiagnosed cannot be accused of just being 'pretenders,' they have serious problems, and are told that this is what they have. It's not some big pity-party conspiracy.

i really was not talking about you or any single person.

i have no idea who you are so i can not say anything to you.

there has to be some correlation coefficient in all asperger people, because if there is no way in the universe that you and me are similar, then the definition of asperger syndrome is dissolute.


so i am not saying you are a pretender or anyone on this forum is.

also, i should start my sentences with "i think"
that would make them less offensive i guess, as it reduces the scope of the idea to just my own head.


+100000

In whole Lebanon ....I just met online ONE aspie.



17 Aug 2008, 9:45 am

I have been thinking maybe lot of people have it. Just like lot of people have dyslexia or other learning disabilities. In my high school, there were kids who had dyslexia but not all of them were in special ed.

It's possible there are people being diagnosed with AS over a few traits because they meet 2 or 3 in the AS criteria instead of two from the first part, one from the second part and all the bold. I have seen some people on the internet who would get undiagnosed with AS because they were diagnosed with it over meeting two or three parts from the criteria.

There are also people who have traits of it but don't have the condition. I don't really care if undiagnosed peopled say they have AS. They know themselves better than anyone on the internet.


I think there are still lot of undiagnosed aspies out there which are adults. Most of them who are being diagnosed are kids or teens because it's something new in our country still, only been 14 years since it's been in the DSM. Parents take to get their kids tested to see what they have because they are having problems and bam AS is suspected. Or parents take their kids to see a psychologist because they are having difficulties and the parents don't know how to help them. And there are some who happen to come across AS and notice it sounds like their child, so they go and take them to see if they have it or not and it's confirmed that they do.
There have also been teens who would come across AS on their own and suspect they have it, go tell their parents and bam they get tested for it and it's confirmed they have it.



The_Cucumber
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 May 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 514

17 Aug 2008, 3:47 pm

Well, since there is no genetic test for Asperger's Syndrome, all it really is is a collection of traits. If you have the traits you are an Aspie. I think there might be some people who have been misdiagnosed as AS. But I think there are even more people out there who are undiagnosed Aspies. Heck I'm reasonably sure the girl I went to prom with is an undiagnosed Aspie, I never got the chance to ask her any questions that could have confirmed it however.


_________________
The improbable goal: Fear nothing, hate nothing, and let nothing anger you.


anbuend
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jul 2004
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,039

17 Aug 2008, 5:34 pm

The_Cucumber wrote:
Well, since there is no genetic test for Asperger's Syndrome, all it really is is a collection of traits. If you have the traits you are an Aspie. I think there might be some people who have been misdiagnosed as AS. But I think there are even more people out there who are undiagnosed Aspies. Heck I'm reasonably sure the girl I went to prom with is an undiagnosed Aspie, I never got the chance to ask her any questions that could have confirmed it however.


Indeed.

And whenever I've been to school, there's been just about exactly the number of people who seem obviously like undiagnosed autistic people, that you'd expect from the number of people at the school, too. Which is a lot of people, really.

I also think the posts to this thread that say "Autistic people aren't all like me, and I don't understand all autistic people, so the ones I don't understand or that are not like me, are not really autistic," say more about ignorance of the diversity of autistic people, than they do about who is really autistic and who isn't. I've found among autistic people that a sizable minority are a lot like me (and we tend to recognize each other pretty readily that way), and the majority are not. And what I just said is true of most autistic people -- most are not like any one person, but lots are. Autistic doesn't mean clones of each other, there are many different expressions of the same underlying stuff, and IMHO it's pretty destructive (whether intentional or not) for people to run around acting on the belief that all autistic people have to be Just Like Them in order to be real. I went to school with somewhere between fifteen and thirty other autistic people at one point, and only identified much with one of them (we became friends quickly due to mutual interests and similar body language/etc).

Wait until you've literally met hundreds of autistic people before you make judgments like that, and make sure you've met a variety, too. I've met enough diagnosed autistic people (with dxes of autism, AS, Rett's, and PDD-NOS) to know that the difference between diagnosed and self-diagnosed is most often a matter of which professional has seen them at what point in time, and often also a matter of age, social class, region, etc. as much as anything. And that there is massive, massive variety even within each autism-related label.

I'm also not sure what's with the extreme amount of doctor-worship in the autistic community.


_________________
"In my world it's a place of patterns and feel. In my world it's a haven for what is real. It's my world, nobody can steal it, but people like me, we live in the shadows." -Donna Williams


acannon
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 28 Sep 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 122

17 Aug 2008, 8:58 pm

Callista wrote:
If you think AS is overdiagnosed because it's diagnosed so often, remember that there are other neurological things that are more common--ADHD (1 in 20), dyslexia (1 in 7), and Tourette's (1 in 100), for example.


If those stats are true, then why aren't they considered to be epidemics and autism is? I'd really like to know that.



Apatura
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2006
Age: 51
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,332

17 Aug 2008, 9:07 pm

I think it is under-diagnosed, especially in females. However I have seen a few individuals on TV who were diagnosed with AS and they did not seem even remotely impaired. There was a documentary on the Discovery Channel about "genius sperm donors" and one guy had a son produced by sperm donation who had been diagnosed with Asperger's, and he didn't look it to me at all. But, maybe he'd been heavily therapized.



release_the_bats
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jul 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,033

17 Aug 2008, 9:12 pm

I suspect that like many things, it is over-diagnosed in some populations and under-diagnosed in others. That's how diagnosis tends to work in general, with any condition.



17 Aug 2008, 9:12 pm

Of course they don't look impaired because they look like everyone else. Even they seem normal to me. AS is closer to normal than autism.



acannon
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 28 Sep 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 122

17 Aug 2008, 9:38 pm

Spokane_Girl wrote:
Of course they don't look impaired because they look like everyone else. Even they seem normal to me. AS is closer to normal than autism.


I've seen other people who I've found out later have been diagnosed with Asperger syndrome and I can tell that they have AS. People with AS tend to carry themselves different than NTs. I don't know how else to explain it, but I can usually tell if someone has AS. AS people are markedly different than NTs, at least, they are to me.



aspiartist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Age: 65
Gender: Female
Posts: 557

17 Aug 2008, 10:07 pm

I don't know who in their right mind would "want" to have the condition. It's only those who don't who could actually want such a thing. Some seem to like their triats. Maybe they get lots of love and support from loved one's that make it a different experience for them. It's only a living nightmare from my perspective.



17 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm

acannon wrote:
Spokane_Girl wrote:
Of course they don't look impaired because they look like everyone else. Even they seem normal to me. AS is closer to normal than autism.


I've seen other people who I've found out later have been diagnosed with Asperger syndrome and I can tell that they have AS. People with AS tend to carry themselves different than NTs. I don't know how else to explain it, but I can usually tell if someone has AS. AS people are markedly different than NTs, at least, they are to me.




How do they look different? I see they look like everyone else. They are everywhere. I can walk into a store, see a guy looking at videogames and wouldn't guess he has AS.

Even Temple Grandin seems normal to me. I have seen her videos. Alex too. I guess I don't know how to pick up on something. I can only tell if they act any different like what Amanda does or that one kid on the news about the spelling bee seemed awkward.
I knew one aspie in real life and boy did he seem normal to me until I went over to his house and boy was he a bully. He manipulated his mother by abusing her and he screamed at her. I couldn't believe she let him get away with all that. I thought at the time that's how aspies act and I was supposed to act that way too but his mother told me he had ODD.



Sedaka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind

17 Aug 2008, 10:41 pm

This is exactly why there needs to be a super secret handshake!


_________________
Neuroscience PhD student

got free science papers?

www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl


Danielismyname
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Apr 2007
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,565

18 Aug 2008, 4:26 am

Sedaka wrote:
This is exactly why there needs to be a super secret handshake!


There is one, or better, around 33 million ones.



b9
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,003
Location: australia

18 Aug 2008, 8:01 am

i think i am a bit lower functioning than most here. i see autism from within and i very much know how it feels, but i guess you just have to take my word for it (as all do on forums). i think the idea of autism has become popularized.

i am only slightly above HFA.

there is profound, then LFA, then MFA, then HFA, then asperger syndrome.

the problem with me and all true autistics, is a deficit in a "mirroring" mechanism due to a organically neuronal insufficiency.

people who say they are AS often seem to me to be not autistic at all.

like, in real life, when someone smiles, i never smile back if i do not see the joke.
even if i do see it, i maybe will not feel like smiling so i will not.
maybe they are not even joking. maybe they are just being......
who knows.

their "feelings" do not enter my soul and that is why i can not mirror to them back what they feel.

so i wonder how some people who say they have autism, have such a popularity rating with their many friends.

how did they get them? could they mirror back to them?
that is like reciprocation, and i am a train off the rails shuddering over the concrete sleepers when it comes to reciprocation.

i am smart enough, but there are smarter autistics.
maybe they may have "cracked" that world of reciprocation that all my mathematic style thought could not identify.

i can not dance with others, but by my self i can swing.
other people are like interference to me. no matter how much i like them as people.

how can some AS people (who i see as pretenders) have such a flourishing social life, and also such a command on their communicativity ?.
sigh...........

so i just hope that the amount of people who claim themselves as "asperger sydromites" does not balloon into a fad.

i think that the condition i suffer is not to be bandied about and alloted to any old person who wants to jump in the boat.

i think that if a doctor has diagnosed you, then you are qualified to say you are AS. (it still may not be correct but it is enough)
you may say that you are as smart as a doctor and can do away with the professional diagnosis.
yes, but you are also possibly biased and a doctor is definitely not biased.

so i really mean that i think that the bulk of "self diagnosed aspies" are erroneous, but i do trust the bulk of professionally diagnosed ones.

it is important not to advertise in too fanciful a way, the ways of AS, as there will be flocks of NT's who just crap anything and learn the basics to "get in".

that is what i think and i am probably wrong but i do not care.
it is my thought.



Sedaka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind

18 Aug 2008, 9:13 am

i am participating in an fMRI study which will hopefully evaluate me either way (for free)... but as a poor college student, i've already emptied my purse exploring the venues available to me.

of course your thoughts are valid...

but there's only so much anyone can do about these things.


_________________
Neuroscience PhD student

got free science papers?

www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl


Aurore
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,187
Location: Virginia Tech

18 Aug 2008, 9:18 am

b9 wrote:
i think i am a bit lower functioning than most here. i see autism from within and i very much know how it feels, but i guess you just have to take my word for it (as all do on forums). i think the idea of autism has become popularized.

i am only slightly above HFA.

there is profound, then LFA, then MFA, then HFA, then asperger syndrome.

the problem with me and all true autistics, is a deficit in a "mirroring" mechanism due to a organically neuronal insufficiency.

people who say they are AS often seem to me to be not autistic at all.

like, in real life, when someone smiles, i never smile back if i do not see the joke.
even if i do see it, i maybe will not feel like smiling so i will not.
maybe they are not even joking. maybe they are just being......
who knows.

their "feelings" do not enter my soul and that is why i can not mirror to them back what they feel.

so i wonder how some people who say they have autism, have such a popularity rating with their many friends.

how did they get them? could they mirror back to them?
that is like reciprocation, and i am a train off the rails shuddering over the concrete sleepers when it comes to reciprocation.

i am smart enough, but there are smarter autistics.
maybe they may have "cracked" that world of reciprocation that all my mathematic style thought could not identify.

i can not dance with others, but by my self i can swing.
other people are like interference to me. no matter how much i like them as people.

how can some AS people (who i see as pretenders) have such a flourishing social life, and also such a command on their communicativity ?.


Years and years of practice. I guess in your eyes I am a pretender. I used to worry maybe I was one, but an MRI revealed gray matter anomalies that are supposedly unique to autism.

I stopped talking when I was eight until about twelve with the exception of a few words (at twelve nothing at all). I understood the language technically. But I did not understand the social things. I was interested, I cared about people, but I couldn't interact with them in any socially acceptable way.

I dedicated my life to the study of facial expressions, body language. I am technically not empathetic - there is no natural skill for me to interpret expressions, to look into the eyes, to feel what another is feeling just by seeing them feel it. However, if someone told me how they felt, then I felt sympathy. When I learned the unconscious cues they gave me, I was able to be extremely sympathetic to the point where sometimes people think I am empathetic!

Now I have many friends, well, not many, but several very understanding ones. Including a fiance.

You seem to have very intense AS. So you are farther down on the spectrum than I am. But I am still on the spectrum; I still have a diagnosis. I am still autistic. I am just not as autistic. But it still influences every part of my life.

I have what they call "atypical Asperger's". Also I am a girl. Maybe that's why it is easier for me.

b9 wrote:
The problem with me and all true autistics, is a deficit in a "mirroring" mechanism due to a organically neuronal insufficiency.


Definitely one of the most, probably the most, important criteria for AS. Problems with mirror neurons. Stimming, rocking, and sensory issues also help define us...also, new evidence shows humans are actually able to grow new neurons, forge better connections, so maybe all that extreme practice helped me with that...? Maybe it could help you too. I am sorry your experience has been so difficult.

b9 wrote:
that is what i think and i am probably wrong but i do not care.

It's always good to have an opinion!

Sedaka wrote:
i am participating in an fMRI study which will hopefully evaluate me either way (for free)...

Super cool.


_________________
?Evil? No. Cursed?! No. COATED IN CHOCOLATE?! Perhaps. At one time. But NO LONGER.?


Last edited by Aurore on 18 Aug 2008, 9:32 am, edited 3 times in total.