gina-ghettoprincess wrote:
will you quit calling us "Aspergians"? It sounds very elitist.
Warsie wrote:
fine, is the "Neurodiverse" a better term
for which?
How about neuro-rational vs. neuro-neutral vs. neuro-mindlessfollower or something like that. Those in the middle, who can be both rational AND social would be the "neutral"?
Zyborg wrote:
My threads are directed only towards Aspergians. Not neurotypicals.
That reminds me of an old Star Trek episode with the Changs vs the Yangs. "Yangs are for killing, not for talking."
DeanFoley wrote:
I'm convinced Zyborg is a very successful satirist. No single person could be that insane.
Define "insane." Krishnamurti said, "Being well-adjusted to a profoundly sick society is no measure of health."
We need to grope around and find our own definition. And this is how to do it.
there are stupid NTs and stupid aspies-which boils down to-there are stupid people