Aspergers and above average IQ
But if they have MR alone, they do not fulfill the criteria for autism-specific social impairments.
You're not considering all the autistics (i.e., those who fulfill the social impairment criteria for autism) who have MR.
Master_Shake
Toucan

Joined: 20 Feb 2009
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 262
Location: Michigan, United States
But if they have MR alone, they do not fulfill the criteria for autism-specific social impairments.
You're not considering all the autistics (i.e., those who fulfill the social impairment criteria for autism) who have MR.
Autistics with IQs of around 70 still do not develop social skills according to their developmental level. A person with Down's Syndrome, for example, develops social skills appropriate to their developmental level. Though, certainly it is different for people with very low IQs such as 30 or 40, these severely impaired people won't develop much social skills at all because they have no understanding of the world around them.
_________________
I'm supposed to say something clever here.
This is exactly what I am talking about; where is the proof for this claim! I know for a fact that this is fallacious. My ex partner works with aspergers kids, who by the way all have IQ's below 70
If they have IQs below 70, they have been misdiagnosed.
I've had my kid tested at ages 4, 6, and 8, and the result was the same: an extemely high verbal IQ and an average preformance IQ, resulting in a full scale IQ of 125. The following are my scores.:
Verbal IQ 145; Performance IQ, 98; Full Scale IQ, 120---the schools gave me the test twice when I was nine, with comment "the gap between intellect and ability must cause considerable daily frustration." And how! The gap between verabal and performance seem to be an indicator of AS or NVLD or somehting that ain't NT. Even if the full scale IQ is high or very high, the brain doctors see this as a red flag.
But if they have MR alone, they do not fulfill the criteria for autism-specific social impairments.
You're not considering all the autistics (i.e., those who fulfill the social impairment criteria for autism) who have MR.
Autistics with IQs of around 70 still do not develop social skills according to their developmental level.
Yes, and neither do autistics at any IQ level. I don't understand the point you intended to make or how it, and the statements following it, address the statements by Katie_WPG or myself.
Master_Shake
Toucan

Joined: 20 Feb 2009
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 262
Location: Michigan, United States
My point was to back up what Katie was saying. You seem to have missed the main idea in her post.
You replied to Katie:
This was exactly the point she was trying to make.
I agree that she was not considering non-AS ASD people. Traditional autism is usually comes with MR and social impairment inconsistent with developmental level.
The point of Asperger's only being diagnosed in those with IQ > 70 is because it is believed Asperger's does not affect intellectual development. People with IQ < 70 often have some kind of "brain damage" caused by disease or trauma.
Tradition autism lowers IQ, Asperger's does not. It is unlikely someone with Asperger's alone will have IQ < 70.
_________________
I'm supposed to say something clever here.
Autism has autism-specific social impairments that cover all IQ levels. The autism social impairment criteria are all that's required to distinguish autism-specific social impairments (at any IQ level) from any social impairments related to other conditions such as MR.
This is because autism social impairments are qualitatively different to other social impairments. Autism social impairments produce a recognisable pattern across all IQ levels.
Katie_WPG's point was that people below IQs of 70 were excluded from AS to distinguish the social skill deficits from those social skills deficits caused by MR. But all that's required to do that is apply the autism-specific social criteria, irrespective of IQ level, so it's a redundant point.
Master_Shake
Toucan

Joined: 20 Feb 2009
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 262
Location: Michigan, United States
This is because autism social impairments are qualitatively different to other social impairments. Autism social impairments produce a recognisable pattern across all IQ levels.
Katie_WPG's point was that people below IQs of 70 were excluded from AS to distinguish the social skill deficits from those social skills deficits caused by MR. But all that's required to do that is apply the autism-specific social criteria, irrespective of IQ level, so it's a redundant point.
Ah I see your point, this is why I stated that requiring IQ > 70 is probably because Asperger's does not affect intelligence, but rather people with IQ < 70 have a condition which does negatively affect intelligence. It looks like we agree with each other but didn't understand the point each of us was trying to make, as I stated autistic people with IQ < 70 fail to develop social skills appropriate to their developmental level.
_________________
I'm supposed to say something clever here.
DentArthurDent
Veteran

Joined: 26 Jul 2008
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,884
Location: Victoria, Australia
If you are so sure of this, you must have access to this particular diagnostic criteria. If so could you please publish it, because I have looked for this and can find it nowhere.
As to the idea that I am trolling

With regard to Intellectual Disability and IQ as I understand it if you have an IQ below 70 you are considered to have an ID. However I stand ready to be corrected.
PS * 'your' refers to anyone and may of may not include Hala
_________________
"I'd take the awe of understanding over the awe of ignorance anyday"
Douglas Adams
"Religion is the impotence of the human mind to deal with occurrences it cannot understand" Karl Marx
KingdomOfRats
Veteran

Joined: 31 Oct 2005
Age: 41
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,833
Location: f'ton,manchester UK
Agrees with DentArthurDent in OP.
it just seems to be used on this forum to create a heirachy,based on IQ.
You replied to Katie:
This was exactly the point she was trying to make.
I agree that she was not considering non-AS ASD people. Traditional autism is usually comes with MR and social impairment inconsistent with developmental level.
The point of Asperger's only being diagnosed in those with IQ > 70 is because it is believed Asperger's does not affect intellectual development. People with IQ < 70 often have some kind of "brain damage" caused by disease or trauma.
Tradition autism lowers IQ, Asperger's does not. It is unlikely someone with Asperger's alone will have IQ < 70.
Classic autism does not lower IQ-it has a wider IQ acceptance at both ends than aspergers does,IQ tests are especially dodgy with auties because they have a bias against individual language and communication difficulties as well as multiple learning disabilities [common with classic autism],the stronger autism gets,the more it can affect IQ.
IQ tests are crap,they're just tests, not a real insight into a persons abilities,who cares if can't do basic education but are good with using hands or computers? or are good with animals? or people [as some spectrumers are]?
_________________
>severely autistic.
>>the residential autist; http://theresidentialautist.blogspot.co.uk
blogging from the view of an ex institutionalised autism/ID activist now in community care.
>>>help to keep bullying off our community,report it!
Master_Shake
Toucan

Joined: 20 Feb 2009
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 262
Location: Michigan, United States
If you are so sure of this, you must have access to this particular diagnostic criteria. If so could you please publish it, because I have looked for this and can find it nowhere.
As to the idea that I am trolling

With regard to Intellectual Disability and IQ as I understand it if you have an IQ below 70 you are considered to have an ID. However I stand ready to be corrected.
PS * 'your' refers to anyone and may of may not include Hala
DSM criteria:
Eh? There is no diagnostic restriction on how smart a person with Asperger's can be. It is simply IQ > 70. There is no restriction on how smart a person with traditional autism can be, however in studies I have seen using people with HFA, the average IQ of those with HFA seems to be around 80. MF autistics haves IQs slightly below 70, while LF autistic can have very low IQs, around 30 or 40. I have seen a study where a group of Aspies had an average intelligence of about 104, about average.
_________________
I'm supposed to say something clever here.
To back up and clarify what Danielismyname was saying about it being possible for some with AS to have MR, I'll quote the DSM on that:
[quote="FireBird"]Sadly I have a negative IQ. I actually have no brain aka "Anencephaly" but I have a less severe version of it, normally when you have this your skull doesn't develop normally. Its a common "human" condition, affecting nearly everyone. Their driving skills proves this. I tried looking for intelligent life on this planet, but couldn't find any. My skull is empty! I've had countless MRI's to prove this. I wish so much that I have a brain, but have no proof. And all my IQ tests were horrible!! 99% of them scored in the Borderline Intellectual Functioning range, otherwise known as BIF. I do nothing that proves I have a higher IQ than that. I can barely do simple math, know little about science, history, or any other subject that requires a brain. Yes, I could read around 3 years of age, but that was due to Hyperlexia.
Firebird - you are obviously very smart. Your writing ability combined with wonderful insight causes me to feel this way. Borderline intelligence- I wouldn't even consider this. You may not be able to do some of the things mentioned, but you are pretty darn insightful!
I got the impression that the social impairment in autism is still largely different from that of someone with mild/moderate MR.
Intuitively and as kids, those with mild MR in specific totally outdo autistic kids of the same age if the autistic kids have AS/HFA for certain.
They have empathy, they can imitate, they try to get in contact with others. Way to go.
It doesn't make much sense to discuss the criteria without the expanded text.
The expanded text is an explanation, clarification of how to understand the criteria, as they are not designed to be understood by themselves.
_________________
Autism + ADHD
______
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it. Terry Pratchett
Wow, I found your post really interesting to read FireBird.

_________________
Into the dark...
Exactly. MR occurring without other known conditions such as autism is common. If MR generally occurred with autism-specific social impairments, a very large percentage with MR would likely meet some PDD diagnosis, which is not the case.
Another source of confusion arises from the terms low-functioning autism, high-functioning autism, and Asperger's. The validity of AS as a separate condition from autism has yet to be established, and it seems some people are assuming the social deficits in autism are related to MR and are qualitatively different to those in AS (and those classed as HFA seem to have been overlooked in this). They may have different expressions, but they are based upon the same criteria. The expression of the social impairment in relatively high-functioning autistics can also be mitigated by intellect and language, but it is still autism-specific social impairment.
The division of the spectrum between HFA and LFA categories also has questionable validity due to the difficulties measuring IQ in autistics, the highly scattered profiles of individuals, and changes in IQ throughout individual development, which relates to what KingdomOfRats said. As a result, the percentage of autistics with MR varies widely between studies.