So I posted in the infamous AS partners forum for NT's...
My question here, is do people here actually not understand the pain of someone crying or do they withdraw in order to protect themselves?
In any case, it is always important to look at where the person is coming from. Healing can only come from understanding the other person's state of mind.
Perhaps an Aspie might behave in behaviors that appear abusive but when shown in context of their disability, actually become quite understandable, and therefore the "victim" can realize that the behaviors were not in fact abusive in the slightest. I think true abuse involves deliberate, purposeful, intent to harm another for the purpose of domination. I don't think a typical Aspie fits this description. Although you can correct me if you think I'm wrong.
This is exactly why I've decided to seek a diagnosis. The fact that I feel I need it in order for others (e.g. my family) to accept and understand me is deeply troubling.
Using your definition of abuse, I think normal people spend their lives trying to abuse each other, pretty much everyone is trying to exert some form of control over everyone they meet, they constantly compete for social dominance without ever being aware that they're doing it.
Edit: Well, its one of the reasons...
I'm a little confused as to where the conversation started from.
Both sides are showing a lack of empathy a lack of coming to a middle ground compromise, a lack of loving, a lack of compassion, a lack of loving.
I admit to having done this in the past (blaming), although I try not to do it anymore. Putting the blame on someone who doesn't understand the effects of their actions. It's possible I'm not an Aspie so keep that in mind.
In any case, I don't think Aspies are unempathetic as a general rule. I knew a couple other people with Asperger's and I never got the impression that they were unempathetic at all in the slightest. I got the impression that they were naive and childlike.
It's also worth pointing out that just because someone posts online and says they are autistic doesn't actually mean that they are. Just because someone posts online and thinks they are NT doesn't actually mean they are (perhaps they are in denial of their own aspergers traits).
I pretty much fully concur with this post. On a ton of autism blogs I often read about someone saying that a particular individual has a tendency to be vicious, malevolent and even intentionally violent because of having autism or Asperger's. And this is outrageous to me. I am most likely on the spectrum and I have had to go through a major baptism by fire, like most posters here, when it comes to learning how to function in our world. I get as enraged as anyone else when the outside world wants us to stay shut out and refuses to try and see things from our point of view. But presuming that being hostile and nasty is an uncontrollable part of autism just makes things worse. I don't like to have to single out specific blogs willy nilly, but I feel this one is a great example of the issue: http://www.confessionsofanaspergersmom. ... 0:00-08:00
in this case, a mother is at the very least giving the impression that her son being a complete jerk is a natural result of Asperger's and that is just not true.
And as for those who say they have autism, often they are self diagnosed autistics. And self diagnosed autistics are often the absolute worst of the worst, the kind who insist that saying truly hurtful things and treating others like absolute garbage is an immutable part of who they are.
btbnnyr
Veteran
Joined: 18 May 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,359
Location: Lost Angleles Carmen Santiago
Regarding the pain of someone crying, if I see someone crying, perhaps I know what events or factors caused them to cry if it is obvious from situation or someone told me, but in most cases, I don't get their crying on a feeling level of feeling with them even if I know all the details of why they are crying. I am not withdrawing from anything to protect myself, as I don't feel particular negative feelings to withdraw from.
_________________
Drain and plane and grain and blain your brain, and then again,
Propane and butane out of the gas main, your blain shall sustain!
I'm a little confused as to where the conversation started from.
Both sides are showing a lack of empathy a lack of coming to a middle ground compromise, a lack of loving, a lack of compassion, a lack of loving.
I admit to having done this in the past (blaming), although I try not to do it anymore. Putting the blame on someone who doesn't understand the effects of their actions. It's possible I'm not an Aspie so keep that in mind.
In any case, I don't think Aspies are unempathetic as a general rule. I knew a couple other people with Asperger's and I never got the impression that they were unempathetic at all in the slightest. I got the impression that they were naive and childlike.
It's also worth pointing out that just because someone posts online and says they are autistic doesn't actually mean that they are. Just because someone posts online and thinks they are NT doesn't actually mean they are (perhaps they are in denial of their own aspergers traits).
I pretty much fully concur with this post. On a ton of autism blogs I often read about someone saying that a particular individual has a tendency to be vicious, malevolent and even intentionally violent because of having autism or Asperger's. And this is outrageous to me. I am most likely on the spectrum and I have had to go through a major baptism by fire, like most posters here, when it comes to learning how to function in our world. I get as enraged as anyone else when the outside world wants us to stay shut out and refuses to try and see things from our point of view. But presuming that being hostile and nasty is an uncontrollable part of autism just makes things worse. I don't like to have to single out specific blogs willy nilly, but I feel this one is a great example of the issue: http://www.confessionsofanaspergersmom. ... 0:00-08:00
in this case, a mother is at the very least giving the impression that her son being a complete jerk is a natural result of Asperger's and that is just not true.
And as for those who say they have autism, often they are self diagnosed autistics. And self diagnosed autistics are often the absolute worst of the worst, the kind who insist that saying truly hurtful things and treating others like absolute garbage is an immutable part of who they are.
As a lot of self-diagnosed go on to be formally diagnosed, (most), your last paragraph is very bizarre. Immutable meaning unchangeable...
Disagree.
Maybe in the minority. But unfortunately the negative stands out more.
_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.
Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.
Using your definition of abuse, I think normal people spend their lives trying to abuse each other, pretty much everyone is trying to exert some form of control over everyone they meet, they constantly compete for social dominance without ever being aware that they're doing it.
I would say that abuse usually involves the intent to harm. It doesn't really make a difference what the underlying purpose is. It could be domination or it could be something else. But negligence or neglect can also be abusive, and it doesn't necessarily involve any specific intent to harm.
I agree people do things to dominate and control each other all the time. But that doesn't mean they are actually trying to harm each other. Cutting in front of someone in line is a way of exerting dominance, but it probably doesn't do any actual harm to the person.
I believe abuse can be unintentional. People don't even always know they are being abusive. How many times have I see parents in the media abusing their children and not even realizing it? By your definition of abuse, what they did wasn't abuse and it doesn't matter how the kid felt. Or how many times have I heard on the Dr. Phil show by an abuser saying they have no memory of such events and they blank out when they get abusive. What about kids who explode and get aggressive or adults and they really can't control their impulse? Wouldn't this be unintentonal but yet it would still be called abuse. What about a parent out there who gets so frustrated they beat their child and then feel bad about it afterwards because they lost control of themselves? They get charged with child abuse if they get caught. I do see people say how stupid some parents are because of their choices they make as parents because they didn't realize it was abusive. if abuse is unintentional, it would mean they didn't do child abuse because it was unintentional or saying that about a partner who hit his wife because he lost control from getting so angry at her. I was also saying my ex wasn't abusing me because he had trust issues so it's not like he was choosing to act controlling and there were other things he did too that are considered abuse by what I have read about relationship abuse. But everyone kept telling me it was abuse abuse abuse and then I read an article in the seventeen magazine about relationship abuse and my ex ticked three of the boxes and my first thought was "oh that was different. He has trust issues, he had AS, he had PTSD." Then i realized after a while abuse is abuse. It doesn't need to be intentional or else people wouldn't be calling the behavior abuse and parents wouldn't be getting charged with child abuse or neglect because they didn't know or because they lost control because they got so frustrated or angry.
_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.
Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.
An attempt at blackmail. Classy.
lel.
Some of us are sane enough not to lose our s**t just because our name got mentioned on the internet.
_________________
Music Theory 101: Cadences.
Authentic cadence: V-I
Plagal cadence: IV-I
Deceptive cadence: V- ANYTHING BUT I ! !! !
Beethoven cadence: V-I-V-I-V-V-V-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I
-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I! I! I! I I I
How does she even have time for a job with all the whining on the internet and hating of WP that she does?
_________________
Music Theory 101: Cadences.
Authentic cadence: V-I
Plagal cadence: IV-I
Deceptive cadence: V- ANYTHING BUT I ! !! !
Beethoven cadence: V-I-V-I-V-V-V-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I
-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I! I! I! I I I
Let me throw this hypothetical situation into the mix:
I buy my husband a bouquet of flowers. Unbeknownst to me, the type of flower I've chosen was a favorite of one of his beloved deceased relatives - the sight of them causes him immense emotional pain. He bursts into tears and runs out of the room.
If we argue that abuse occurs whenever one person causes pain to another, without regard for intent, then this scenario would make me an abusive spouse. And I think that idea is ridiculous.
I agree. People can make mistakes, can hurt people by accident, and that's unfortunate. But every bad thing that happens is not abuse. If you and I are walking through a hallway and I accidently bump into you, that's not abuse even if you fall down and break your arm.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Why do married couples always refer to their partners as... |
24 Jan 2025, 7:32 pm |
New to the forum and the reality of ASD |
02 Jan 2025, 7:01 pm |
forum post likely to increase polarization |
28 Dec 2024, 12:54 pm |
Finally managed to join the forum! |
21 Jan 2025, 11:30 pm |