Greentea wrote:
'Humankind cannot bear very much reality.'
It must be more complex than this. Otherwise, why do they explore outer space and don't continue to think that the moon is made of cheese?
I think you can see the broader human pattern in toddlers. Picture a toddler. He toddles away from mom to see what's in the next room, what's in the box, what was that noise, what happens if I shake this object. He's very curious and wants to know everything about the world. But at the same time he's very curious, he wants his personal world to stay completely stable. When he returns from seeing what was around that corner, he wants to see that mom is still right where he left her and has not disappeared or been replaced with a monster.
I think that mix of wanting to know
everything while at the same time wanting our world to stay stable and not be rocked too much persists to adulthood. So as a species we take in new pieces of paradigm-shifting information very slowly, over the course of decades or centuries, so that as a species we explore reality but at the same time do it in baby steps so our world doesn't get rocked too much.
On a personal level we want to know all about ourselves and how we tick and
everything but ok, not really everything. We want to know a little about how others' perceive us but not the literal, unvarnished truth 24/7/365. It's too destabilizing. So the reality about ourselves is explored in small, manageable steps and luckily for our psyches (according to neurologists and psychologists) it isn't possible for us to have full understanding. Our egos weave a story that ties all the sensory input together into something manageable and too much reality would unravel that and leave us shattered.