DandelionFireworks wrote:
anbuend wrote:
I'm not going to argue it at length, but there are other ways to understand the world than a particular thing that gets called "reason" and another particular thing called "emotion" and "irrationality". Both my native way of thinking, and another way of thinking that I have learned, fall under that category. I know that you can argue linguistically that there's only "reason" (again, one particular way of thinking, or a collection of similar ways of thinking) and "irrationality". But that's just semantic. There are other valid ways of thinking that can come to conclusions that aren't even possible to imagine in the kinds of thought that get called "rational" the most often. And that's just me stating... well 'belief' is another linguistic concept I don't claim, but close enough.
Could you elaborate on alternatives?
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
It sounds interesting.
Unfortunately neither one of them fits into language-based frameworks one at all. One of them can be alluded to but not directly described, and the other one actively seems to
break all descriptions aimed at it.
I'm not sure if I made clear (from the other response I got) that these don't really fit into any description of 'rational thought' I've ever heard, but nor do they fit into 'irrational'. They're just... something else. Not emotion either.
_________________
"In my world it's a place of patterns and feel. In my world it's a haven for what is real. It's my world, nobody can steal it, but people like me, we live in the shadows." -Donna Williams