YellowBanana wrote:
When I choose to think of others before myself, I am told I am only doing that because I want to do it and therefore it is a selfish choice.
When I decide just to do what comes naturally (which depending on the situation might be looking after others first, or looking after me first), I am told I am being self-centred because I am not purposefully considering the needs of others before those of myself.
Damn. Can't win.
There's a philosophical argument that there is no such thing as true altruism. The argument relies on a nasty debate tactic where the meaning of "selfishness" is misleading because the definition is absurdly broad. It's a completely dishonest approach to altruism.
The "Is doing things for others a selfish act" philosophical argument rests squarely in "What if dreaming was real life and vice versa?", and "Dude, what if everyone in the world were high?" territory.
You can win. The next time someone attempts to tell you that doing things for other people is a selfish act, ask them "Would asking you to not share your idiotic opinions also be a selfish act?" Of course the answer is yes, but at least you're not dealing with someone whose ethics are rooted in moral dissonance.