People you know of who you suspect are Aspie Wannabies

Page 4 of 4 [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

wozeree
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Aug 2013
Age: 63
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,344

21 Jan 2014, 9:00 pm

Waterfalls wrote:
wozeree wrote:
These kinds of threads genuinely confuse me.

First off, you are questioning somebody who claims to be diagnosed but who has not proven it to your satisfaction - this reminds me of the birthers. Shall we call them instead, the Diagnosers! :D :D You need to see the paper!!

And then some of you get all snippity about those of us who are not diagnosed but are sure we have it. I feel a little like you think that by claiming I am Autistic, you feel like I am personally violating you, as though I was slapping your wife's butt (with intent!) when you aren't looking. or something equally egregious.

It's all a mystery to me why you care - and I don't believe the We are harming people who need accommodations thing. I mean people get upset when Adam (what's his name?) is associated with Autism because it makes everyone think badly of us, but then you get upset when somebody is working and supporting themselves with Autism because that somehow damages the group too.

I am really proud of myself that I get up and go to work and do the things I have to do, even when life seems like a crappy insurmountable mountain and when I am overwhelmed with the painful aspects of Autism. Looking around this forum, I see it in so many people, not just those of us who are working full time, but people who face so much overwhelming crap and keep rising to the surface like ....hmmm I'm losing my metaphor :) - does really good cream work? Or maybe like someone who is in danger of drowning, but their head keeps popping back up.

Too me, that's what's important (although I am one of the one's who is not in the select club, so of course I would feel that way)!


But you baffle me people, ok! :) :o

I am sorry this thread is hurtful and had thought about staying away because it seemed likely this topic could be controversial, someone could get hurt, and I don't want to be part of hurting anyone.

The idea that ASD is overdiagnosed seems to me to be what is concerning. It's quite ugly to decide people aren't entitled to be proud of pushing through despite difficulties and instead should be seeing themselves as weak. But that's part of the new definition of ASD: needs support. What that is doesn't seem to be defined yet. This isn't, at least I don't think, about Wrong Planet, I think it's about the experiment in redefining ASDs that is taking place from outside the ASD community. I've probably not expressed this well---maybe someone else can help say it more clearly?


Autism = Disabled



LoveNotHate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,195
Location: USA

21 Jan 2014, 9:22 pm

wozeree wrote:
These kinds of threads genuinely confuse me.

First off, you are questioning somebody who claims to be diagnosed but who has not proven it to your satisfaction - this reminds me of the birthers. Shall we call them instead, the Diagnosers! :D :D You need to see the paper!!But you baffle me people, ok! :) :o


Yes, you are confused.

The thread is about "wannabees".

The problem is that no one can define what it means to have AS. I showed that AS people can be extreme socializers by showing Mr. Aykroad.

Thus, no one can determine "wannabees".



Verdandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 55
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)

21 Jan 2014, 9:43 pm

LoveNotHate wrote:
wozeree wrote:
These kinds of threads genuinely confuse me.

First off, you are questioning somebody who claims to be diagnosed but who has not proven it to your satisfaction - this reminds me of the birthers. Shall we call them instead, the Diagnosers! :D :D You need to see the paper! !But you baffle me people, ok! :) :o


Yes, you are confused.

The thread is about "wannabees".

The problem is that no one can define what it means to have AS. I showed that AS people can be extreme socializers by showing Mr. Aykroad.

Thus, no one can determine "wannabees".


The point made in other posts that some people have identified themselves as wannabes but otherwise, yeah, it doesn't seem all that clear cut to me.



ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,264
Location: Long Island, New York

22 Jan 2014, 5:49 pm

I am the OP of this thread and I agree it is not clear cut as to what it is and how widespread it is. But the belief of widespread Aspie Wanabees and as Waterfalls was getting at the related belief of overdiagnoses is being used to beat us down. I have demonstrated it is one reason the diagnoses does not officially exist anymore. It is destroying the credibility of the diagnoses and thus us in the eyes of the public and validating those in the public and the psychiatric professions who never believed it was real. It is a factor as to why some classic autistic's and especially parents of classic/low functioning autistic loathe us.

In a perfect world it should not matter. People who have a condition should get diagnosed and treated for it no matter how many fakers there are. Sadly this is not the case. We can't fight a problem unless we know what and how widespread it is. So as difficult and complicated it is we need to keep trying.

Thank you for listening and for all your replies so far.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman