Inventor wrote:
Well I did post once that I was going to round up everyone and give them math tests, but I was overruled because I cannot draw, have no musical talent, but I can fix any machine. I thought I was well read, I have been put to shame by people much younger, I hold my own in Physics, and am weak in a hundred other places.
I have tried to figure this place. I thought clusters of related intelligence, it did not pan out. My statment stands, I have never matched a pair in this game. At the same time I relate to everyone.
Yeah, I'm kind of the same as you, but different. I can fix any machine. I have read science and technical books, but not TOO much else lately. I used to be THE clear expert in every aspect of my interests, and a PERFECTIONIST, but the interests have gotten profitable and some people just think they are smarter than they are. They learn needless things, and try to point me in a direction I never wanted to go. Why use a special inefficient feature that only works on one system, as they want, when I can use a common efficient feature? Still, they persuade by number and argument, so I end up doing it. 8-( THAT makes them appear to have some skills I don't. THAT, coupled with timetables and argument, has caused me to lose my perfectionism. 8-(
Still, there ARE some close matches. I have seen some like me, some like you, some like some others. Nobody is IDENTICAL though. Actually, MY strengths are mechanics and some sciences that aren't based on physics. I guess yours are math and physics.
Mozart,
I already did. 2 cycles is enough! 8-(
poopylungstuffing,
Oh, it's not your fault. I kind of expected this a few, weeks ago. I even commented on it, but retracted my comment a couple minutes later in case I was wrong. It is IRONIC! Some argued that so many AS people are smarter because so much of the lower end is weeded out by the diagnosis.
Steve