lostonearth35 wrote:
You'd think that if our food were really still living they would be glad to *not* be eaten.
People have told me however, that I would often talk about my stuffed animals as if they were living things, like when I thought I should give them away because I didn't role-play with them as much, and that they should be owned a kid would would really enjoy them, especially if they can't afford to have many good toys. But if I did I'd often end up missing them and realize I'd never see them again.
Darn you, Toy Story! Darn you to heck!
Personifying toys seems to be quite a common thing, based on the responses here! I don't think Toy Story is just to blame (though it probably has made it a bit worse).
But that's an interesting point... Maybe food
does want to be eaten because it would then be fulfilling its inherent purpose. If a piece of food was left on the plate, it might assume that it is not loved and did not live up to its expectations as a piece of food.
_________________
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 129 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 100 of 200
You seem to have both neurodiverse and neurotypical traits
AQ: 39 / 50