WTF Article claims Positive Effects of Bullying Autistics

Page 4 of 16 [ 248 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 16  Next

ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,609
Location: Long Island, New York

15 Oct 2015, 8:05 am

Although my bullying was a lot less then some who grew up in the pre spectrum era
I can't think of anything good that came out of the era when bullying was considered a right of passage, boys bieng boys etc. For some that had the physical or social skills to fight back it probably did build some self esteem. But for me without these skills all it make me was less self confident then 99% of the people. Lack of self confidence is a big problem in the job market. Some lack of self confidence persists at age 58.

When I grew up there was much more freedom and time to escape then today's autistic kids have to deal with 25-40 hours of ABA and what most kids that have to deal with thier helicopter parents managing and monitoring thier every action. That freedom gave a me sense of self identity. But that was seperate from the bullying.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


Spiderpig
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Apr 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,893

15 Oct 2015, 8:18 am

ASPartOfMe wrote:
Although my bullying was a lot less then some who grew up in the pre spectrum era
I can't think of anything good that came out of the era when bullying was considered a right of passage, boys bieng boys etc. For some that had the physical or social skills to fight back it probably did build some self esteem. But for me without these skills all it make me was less self confident then 99% of the people. Lack of self confidence is a big problem in the job market. Some lack of self confidence persists at age 58.


I never managed to fight back effectively, so the lesson for me was that I'm simply at the mercy of bullies, too. But isn't this the whole point? It helps the strong realize how strong they are and thus it benefits them. Benefitting the strong is important for the species and society. It also weeds out the weak, which further benefits the group. Of course it's bad for the weak being weeded out, but this is a feature, not a bug---it is meant to harm us, and for a good reason.


_________________
The red lake has been forgotten. A dust devil stuns you long enough to shroud forever those last shards of wisdom. The breeze rocking this forlorn wasteland whispers in your ears, “Não resta mais que uma sombra”.


electrictype
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 5 Oct 2015
Age: 24
Gender: Female
Posts: 143
Location: Ohio

15 Oct 2015, 8:51 am

This is just sick. "More friendships" ...LOL


_________________
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 172 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 38 of 200
You are very likely neurodiverse (Aspie)


NowhereWoman
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2009
Age: 57
Gender: Female
Posts: 499
Location: Los Angeles, CA

15 Oct 2015, 9:44 am

Spiderpig wrote:
ASPartOfMe wrote:
Although my bullying was a lot less then some who grew up in the pre spectrum era
I can't think of anything good that came out of the era when bullying was considered a right of passage, boys bieng boys etc. For some that had the physical or social skills to fight back it probably did build some self esteem. But for me without these skills all it make me was less self confident then 99% of the people. Lack of self confidence is a big problem in the job market. Some lack of self confidence persists at age 58.


I never managed to fight back effectively, so the lesson for me was that I'm simply at the mercy of bullies, too. But isn't this the whole point? It helps the strong realize how strong they are and thus it benefits them. Benefitting the strong is important for the species and society. It also weeds out the weak, which further benefits the group. Of course it's bad for the weak being weeded out, but this is a feature, not a bug---it is meant to harm us, and for a good reason.


I don't see weeding out the physically weakest as a plus when it comes to a species that relies on intellect and forethought. That doesn't make much sense. If that had worked well for our species over the past 2.5 million years (and most specifically, within the past 35,000 years), we wouldn't be communicating on computers right now, we'd be hulking around waiting to scoop up the abandoned remnants of someone else's kill before curling up in a protected hole for the night. Because the nerdy smart ones would have all been bullied either literally to death or, at the very least, out of the group to fend for themselves, and the physically hulking ones who could toss others around would have dominated and their genetics would have predominantly been what were passed along. But obviously that isn't what happened. Obviously, evolution selected (I get that evolution can't technically think or select, but you get the idea) for intellect and forethought more so than individual physical strength in our species - considering the fact that as compared to some other animals, we really aren't very individually physically strong/survival-selected from a physical/pushing/"bullying"/forcing perspective.

Indeed, history would appear to show that the ones who couldn't physically dominate were the ones who had to rely more on wiles and intellect, or at least those who could survive on wiles and intellect survived longer/better overall v. hulking physical bullies as evidenced by the fact that overall, humans aren't very physically amazing as compared to much of the animal world. When we need to be physically strong for survival, we tend to do so in groups and always have, because physically we're really not amazing specimens at all. Our hearing is pretty bad, our sense of smell is pathetic as compared to many animals, our nails are weak and breakable and don't do us a lot of good (v. claws), we don't have tearing, attacking, self-protecting canine teeth, we don't have enough fur to keep warm in very cold conditions and so on.

In fact, though "might" is admired, so too is capability in areas that don't include physical might and it was indeed the latter that have brought us to computers, cars, preserved food rather than starvation and all the thousands of little pieces of technology you and I use every single day. A natural overriding proclivity for harming, as you say, and eliminating the physically weaker would never have allowed for that. Indeed, though the "mighty" have always been admired and considered heroes, when they abused that power they were often ejected from the group (or were demoted from power, or forced out of power by a group, etc.) - not the weaker ones they were bullying. Why? Because from a survival standpoint, our particular makeup is such that we need our diversity in order to carry on. Therefore it was the bullies (and tyrants and all manners of description of "bully") who were, and are, anti-survival when it comes to human beings and human groups.

Disposing of the actually literally incapable of surviving was a tradition among many groups for many centuries - say, the very ill, or those with what were considered birth defects - as it was assumed those wouldn't survive anyway and hence would be drain on the group. (No longer true today with medical advances, more food and resources, etc.) But that wasn't based on being disgusted by just a basic physical weakness yet overall good health. That literally was based on survival: Infant X was born without legs, Infant X will never be able to forge for himself or help the group forage, Infant X will need to be carried when running away which will slow down the entire group, hence the entire group could potentially die, etc. Again, thank goodness we don't (at least in first world nations) feel the need to take these measures today. But perhaps a personality that wishes to bully is the "birth defect" version of this biological inclination/decision making process, who knows.

One more thing that I believe is worthy of note: if bullying were naturally selected for and pro-survival, we should be seeing a majority who are natural bullies. But we don't. (Thank goodness.) Take for example a grade of children, four classes, ~25 kids per classroom, so we'll say 100 kids. Out of those 100 kids, as many as four or five might be the "class bullies" and travel around as a "pack" looking to terrorize the "weak." Four or five out of 100 certainly would not seem to be a natural biological selection in favor of survival.

Although it may theoretically apply to some species (not sure but it's a possibility), I don't see your theory as valid when it comes to humans.



Last edited by NowhereWoman on 15 Oct 2015, 10:13 am, edited 4 times in total.

Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,481
Location: Aux Arcs

15 Oct 2015, 9:54 am


_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi


League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,280
Location: Pacific Northwest

15 Oct 2015, 10:11 am

I can think the reason why the article didn't upset me and why I thought what she was really saying is because I never had it bad at others who were bullied. Yes I was teased and harassed and forced to do things I didn't want to do and then get in trouble for it, and being tricked into doing things to be laughed at and then having a nervous breakdown in 6th grade but others who had it worse will take it the extreme way and I think the word "bully" is a subjective word and we have to look at what does the author mean by bullying. Is she talking about normal kid stuff like as*holes and teasing than abusers? Most people when they think of bullying, they might be thinking of a kid who says "You're a cry baby" when they cry or calling a kid chicken when they refuse to do something that will get them into trouble or just teasing them and yeah most adults tell the kid to ignore it. Which would be the reason why they trivialize it and think victims are weak when they let it affect them because they do not realize how bad it is and they have never seen it nor have had it happen to them.

My mother doesn't think I was ever bullied truly, just teased and not understood but it still doesn't make my feelings not valid or how it affected me and I might just have been a very sensitive person which is why things stood out more and affected me more. But it was a constant thing in my life than once one a while for most kids. I bet if it was only once in a while the it would have been easy for me to ignore and still be happy in life and have good self esteem. But all this still made me grow stronger as a person and it did get me to change my behaviors because I was sick of being mislabeled and misjudged and being called crazy or weird or show off. I don't know if that was bullying there but I always took it personal from the negative feedback I got. It's not like those kids followed me around calling me those things but I would over hear them say it. I wouldn't say that was bullying unless they were intentionally doing it to make sure I heard them say it.

But I think this article caused a lot of knee jerk reactions and triggered PTSD flashbacks.


_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.

Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.


Last edited by League_Girl on 15 Oct 2015, 10:27 am, edited 2 times in total.

NowhereWoman
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2009
Age: 57
Gender: Female
Posts: 499
Location: Los Angeles, CA

15 Oct 2015, 10:17 am

League_Girl wrote:

But I think this article caused a lot of knee jerk reactions and triggered PTSD flashbacks.


Certainly it did, because that's what bullying does, it causes permanent scars.

Yet another strike against bullying being not all that bad a thing and in fact, a positive and good learning experience toward our overall development and our futures.

If it can cause, as you described, a knee-jerk reaction even 10, 20, heck, for some of us, 40 years later, that's probably supporting evidence that bullying isn't an experience with positives we can carry forward as we progress through our lives.

You're correct that bullying can be subjective and may be confused with teasing depending upon the person/people and situation. But that's another good point. The individual who wrote the article is, as she proclaims herself, a professional and surely realizes the (overall) difference between actual bullying, and conflict/teasing. But she is the one who chose the term bullying specifically. So we have to assume as she is versed in these and other issues, she is speaking of what the general population (not a few isolated over-sensitive and reactive individuals) would consider bullying, when she used the term.



QuantumChemist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Oct 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,058
Location: Midwest

15 Oct 2015, 10:55 am

I understand what the author of the article is trying to say (use the bullying incident to impart good things instead of bad), but it can easily misinterpreted to mean something else based on the title. It was probably chosen to catch your attention, without thinking that it could change how the article in interpreted by readers.

My take on being bullied as a youth: Yes, it did make me stronger, but at a huge cost. There was serious damage done to my self-esteem and overall mental health. I became a much different person, something that I am not proud of. Back then, I was pushed a bit too far too many times to just let things slide as they just would not stop. It made me go from an average smart kid who just wanted to be left alone to someone who simply wanted revenge at all costs when attacked. At the time, I was obsessed with various defense strategies for more than just protection. That started me down a dark path that could have held a very bad ending for me. However, my parents stopped me at the right time and moved me to a different school where bullying level was much lower. It took about twenty years for me to convert my anger towards my bullies into positive energy (something that they are trying to do with the article). It is not an easy thing to do.



LivingInParentheses
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Oct 2015
Age: 52
Posts: 544
Location: upstate NY

15 Oct 2015, 12:01 pm

Ugh. I am still waiting for those positive effects to happen I guess. But while waiting I went ahead and saw a psychiatrist and I just got his report today. Funny, he didn't say anything about it being a good thing for me either.

Actually what he said was "From a psychological perspective," [my name] "experienced peer rejection, teasing, and social isolation during adolescence, presumably because of social skills deficits and pragmatic language problems. The combination of these experiences also seems to be a contributor to her mood, anxiety, and attention problems."

Then he went ahead and listed those "mood, anxiety, and attention problems" under the "Diagnosis - DSM-5" section as follows... "social anxiety disorder, panic attacks, dysthymia, pragmatic language disorder (asperger's), ADHD".

So HEY thanks, people who bullied me as a kid. I just got to pay over $500 cash out of pocket to be diagnosed with stuff that my doctor himself says were caused in part by the bullying.

Any time those positive effects are ready to come on into my life, I'm here waiting. It's only been 35 years, I guess I can wait a little longer. :roll:


_________________
~ ( Living in Parentheses ) - female aspie, diagnosed at 42 ~
BAP: 132 aloof, 121 rigid, 84 pragmatic // Cambridge Face Memory Test: 62% // AQ: 39


Last edited by LivingInParentheses on 15 Oct 2015, 12:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

VisInsita
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 29 Feb 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 375
Location: Finland

15 Oct 2015, 12:07 pm

Yeah, bullying teaches you valuable lessons in life, just like the neighborhood pedophile only taught kids sexuality, if you ask him. And isn't it positive for the kids to learn this valuable lesson concerning the human character...?

In my opinion you don't need to derive something positive from negative just of obligation. Similarly you don't need to forgive of obligation, just because what happened is now talked in the past tense.

I personally can't ever forgive how some people played on my life. I have been able to forgive everything else that has happened to me in life. I lost so much and gained nothing. It is me who has to live on wounded. Their forgiveness is every laughter I still am able to laugh, every drop of love I still feel, thanks to other people. I am in no debt, they are.



Edna3362
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 Oct 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,796
Location: ᜆᜄᜎᜓᜄ᜔

15 Oct 2015, 2:00 pm

Here's what happened to my case:
Positive Effects? I got those...
If such things ends up with things called "Anger" and "Hatred".

But then, somewhere in between the two, there's "Control". Control not from others, but to self if one could rid of their own anxiety (That includes PTSD and depression).


Rid of your anxiety, you'll see the positive effects alright. However, it can take time or luck. A certain kind of realization that has something to do with words "..because I can.", disregards regret, apathy towards useless negative feedbacks, and the reward of 'winning', as much as losing lost it's meaning or context. (Winning doesn't make you feel good, losing doesn't make you feel bad either)

End result? :twisted: I tricked a few thinking I'm vulnerable and gullible because of my natural body language. They end up regretting it when I backfired them all. I harness that said "Anger" and "Hatred" out of them.
And I intend to use this protect the others, teach them in a way without making them 'suffer' as much as I had.


_________________
Gained Number Post Count (1).
Lose Time (n).

Lose more time here - Updates at least once a week.


redrobin62
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Apr 2012
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,009
Location: Seattle, WA

15 Oct 2015, 2:08 pm

That article had to have been a joke, a twisted attempt at comedy. I'm not laughing so I guess I don't get it, though.



starfox
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Mar 2015
Posts: 1,012
Location: United states of Eurasia

15 Oct 2015, 3:06 pm

I'd say in a way yes it can make you 'tougher' but it come at a price of never trusting people and being afraid of making friends so instead you act aloof or like a douche.

It means you may be able to cope with a dangerous environment but would feel out of place if you find yourself in a normal environment. You might end up causing trouble just to feel more secure. It means you might only understand that people are expected to bully you and that if people are nice to you that is impossible and cannot happen so you make them hate you on purpose. You literally can't handle people being friendly.

Cos this is what's up with me from being bullied. Mind you it was not just a few people but all my year group and for ages I thought it was fine and to be expected.


_________________
We become what we think about; since everything in the beginning is just an idea.

Destruction and creation are 2 sides of the same coin.


ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,609
Location: Long Island, New York

15 Oct 2015, 4:34 pm

Spiderpig wrote:
ASPartOfMe wrote:
Although my bullying was a lot less then some who grew up in the pre spectrum era
I can't think of anything good that came out of the era when bullying was considered a right of passage, boys bieng boys etc. For some that had the physical or social skills to fight back it probably did build some self esteem. But for me without these skills all it make me was less self confident then 99% of the people. Lack of self confidence is a big problem in the job market. Some lack of self confidence persists at age 58.


I never managed to fight back effectively, so the lesson for me was that I'm simply at the mercy of bullies, too. But isn't this the whole point? It helps the strong realize how strong they are and thus it benefits them. Benefitting the strong is important for the species and society. It also weeds out the weak, which further benefits the group. Of course it's bad for the weak being weeded out, but this is a feature, not a bug---it is meant to harm us, and for a good reason.


For many many years I thought the because of my small size, more of them then me, and what I now know as lack of social skills my belief was that fighting back would result in the retaliation bieng incrementally more and more painful then just taking it. I was utterly wrong in that belief. True the first few times or the retailiation would have been very painful but eventually the bullies would get frustrated and I would gain respect the other students and they would have taken my side.

That was then when schools had a hands off, let the kids settle it attitide. Now many schools in an effort to avoid bad publicity and lawsuits blame the victim and side with the bullies, especially if the parents of the bullies of "pillars of the community". There have been a number of news stories where the victim filmed the bullies and the whole community rallied around the bullies and the teacher who did nothing. In a couple of instances the kid filming was arrested for filming. I posted of few of these when they happened. In other communities reactions were the opposite. So I would not know what to advise now.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


B19
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 9,993
Location: New Zealand

15 Oct 2015, 4:44 pm

Hi Underwater: only the first two sentences of my earlier post, to which you responded, were addressing yours; sorry that I didn't make that clear at the time. There was no need for you to apologise, and the rest of the post was in response to the apologists, not yourself.

I would add about my generation, born very soon after the end of the second world war and growing up in the 1950s:

- that generation of children as a group were very definitely regarded as third class citizens undeserving of respect, whose status was considered immeasurably less than adults/parents/grandparents and they were not seen as having rights of self or protection for the main part.

-that as there was immense sympathy for the returned (an often very damaged) soldiers from the War, this was imposed as a yardstick to invalidate and silence any other kinds of victim, particularly the children (who were powerless) and it was common to hear parents say things like "Shut your face, what do you have to complain about?" even when a child had suffered some kind of painful injury.

I don't think we were more free, in fact less so, though what was different is that the kinds of oppression my generation faced were different from the kinds of oppression later cohorts faced, including the current young generation; each is free in some ways and not in others.

What would now be instantly recognised as very serious forms of child abuse were not even acknowledged by the adult world then and wilful denial was also entrenched. The double standards of the time are frightening to consider, even from this perspective of distance. It was a far more violent time in many ways, and some of the men were so damaged by the war - that as teachers, as fathers, as family members, they were unable to moderate their behaviour and no-one had any formal knowledge of parenting skills - it was just assumed that parents had the right to parent any way they wanted, the children were their 'property' to do as they wished with and if they abused them, people looked the other way.



iliketrees
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Mar 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,155
Location: Earth

15 Oct 2015, 4:51 pm

Social media has hugely changed bullying. It would end as soon as you left the playground unless you saw them at the park or they went to your house or something. But now it's constant with no escape. Anything at school can continue online. There is probably less physical bullying though. Also smartphones to record and instantly upload anything. More mind games I suspect using bad videos as blackmail.