gwenevyn wrote:
tomamil wrote:
nutbag wrote:
Recent research reveals fact that most researchers cannot think logically.
hehe, be careful, there are many researchers here at WP
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca373/ca373cf6105a277f71f4423a82446d04559f9055" alt="Smile :)"
Honestly, I'd agree with nutbag, exchanging the word "many" for "most". I made a habit of reading scholarly journal articles, and so often under all that smug scholarship, there are some really glaring errors. The peculiarities of a certain popular parenting philosophy are based almost entirely on faulty interpretation of data. It makes me ill.
Why the HECK does anyone even care about semantics? I can imagine and create worlds, some even seem to get their own life! It can get to be like a dream with every aspect appearing real.
Why would I care what some IDIOTS call it. Their "experiment" is STUPID! Even a DIRECT measurement on a KNOWN component on a KNOWN condition could yield a VERY wrong result! HOW??? Here is an example!....
1. Faster wheel movement on the ground leads to faster motion. FACT!
2. Given the same ratios, faster engine speed means faster wheel movement. FACT!
3. Faster engine speed, all other things being equal, means faster power consumption. FACT!
4. Using their stupid testing, faster power consumption means the vehicle is moving faster! ******WRONG******! The air conditioner may be running, the radio might be on, maybe there is more work that needs to be done.
Still, that 1-4 is on a KNOWN situation. People have a hard enough time understanding some of my ideas. How could they hope to relate a vague reading of some part of my brain to what I am doing?
Steve